1979The function of tag questions in English. In Papers from the Fifth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Tore Pettersson (ed), 9–17. Lund: Acta Universitatis Lundensis and Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
1990It’s a myth, innit? Politeness and the English tag questions. In The State of the Language, Christopher Ricks & Leonard Michaels (eds), 443–450. Berkeley CA: Centennial Books, University of California Press.
Algeo, John
2006British or American English? Cambridge: CUP.
Allerton, David
2009Tag questions. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenbur & Julia Schlüter (eds), 306–323. Cambridge: CUP.
Andersen, Gisle
1997 “I goes you hang it up in your shower, innit? He goes yeah.” The use and development of invariant tags and follow-ups in London teenage speech. Paper Given at First Language Variation Wokshop, Reading, April 1997.
Andersen, Gisle
1998Are tag questions questions? Evidence from spoken data. Paper presented at the 19th ICAME Conference. Belfast, Ma, 1998. [URL] (16 May 2012).
2014Confirmation-demanding tag questions in fiction dialogue. In Subjectivity and Epistemicity: Corpus, Discourse, and Literary Approaches to Stance [Lund Studies in English 117], Dylan Glynn & Mette Sjölin (eds), 165–185. Lund: Lund University.
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP.
Baciu, Ileana
1983The function of minor questions in conversation. Cahiers de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 28(20.1): 15–19.
Bald, Wolf-Dietrich
1979English tag questions and intonation. In Anglistentag, Kuno Schumann (ed), 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.
2015Tag questions across Irish English and British English: A corpus analysis of form and function. Multilingua 34(4): 495–525.
Baumann, Marie
1976Two features of ‘women’s speech’? In The Sociology of Languages of American Women, Betty Lou Dubois & Isabel Crouch (eds), 33–40. San Antonio TX: Trinity University.
Beckman, Mary & Ayers, Gayle Elam
1993Guidelines for ToBI Labelling. The Ohio State University Research Foundation. [URL] (11 January 2014).
Beckman, Mary, Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
2005The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic Typology - The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Robert Ladd & Sun-Ah Jun (eds), 9–54. Oxford: OUP.
Bennett, William
1989The structure of English tags. Word 40(3): 315–333.
Bergmann, Pia
2007How to model the “meaning” of intonation: Some insights from an interactional perspective. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 239–245.
Berry, Margaret
1981Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds), 20–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Biscetti, Stefania
2006Tag questions in courtroom discourse. In Studies in Specialized Discourse, John Flowerdew & Maurizio Gotti (eds), 209–238. Bern: Peter Lang.
Blankenship, Kevin & Craig, Traci
2007aLanguage and persuasion: Tag questions as powerless speech or as interpreted in context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(1): 112–118.
Blankenship, Kevin & Craig, Traci
2007bPowerless language markers and the correspondence bias - Attitude confidence mediates the effects of tag questions on attitude attributions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(1): 28–47.
Boersma, Paul
2002Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5.9(10): 34–45.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.04. [URL]
Bolinger, Dwight
1947American English intonation. American Speech 22(2): 134–136.
Bolinger, Dwight
1957Interrogative structures of American English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 28. Tuscaloosa AL: Alabama University Press.
Bolinger, Dwight
1961Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37: 366–381.
Bolinger, Dwight
1989Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Arnold.
Bonsignori, Veronica
2007Tag Questions in English: A Syntactic, Pragmatic and Prosodic Account. PhD dissertation, Universita’ Di Pisa.
Bonsignori, Veronica
2013English Tags: A Close-Up on Film Language, Dubbing and Conversation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga
2008Tag questions in Philippine English. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 39: 109–134.
Bouton, Lawrence F.
1990The imperative tag. A thing apart. World Englishes 9(1): 37–52.
1980Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Brown, Gillian
1977Listening to Spoken English. London: Longman.
Brown, Gillian, Curry, Karen & Kenworthy, John
1980Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.
Bublitz, Wolfram
1978Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und Englishen. Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen und ihrer englischen Entsprechungen [Linguistische Arbeiten 57]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bublitz, Wolfram
1997Tag questions, transformational grammar and pragmatics. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 9: 5–23.
Burleson, Deborah
2014Intonation patterns in English tag questions of Japanese speakers of English as a second language. IULC Working Papers 7. [URL] (19 April 2016).
Butler, Christopher
1985Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications. London: Batsford.
Buttiens, Luc & Lens, Fred
1977Tag Question: A Status Questionis. A Corpus Analysis of British Theatrical Language. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
1988Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds), 74–93. London: Longman.
Case, Susan
1988Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, Laurie Larwood & Suzanna Rose (eds), 41–63. New York NY: Praeger.
Cattell, Ray
1973Negative transportation and tag questions. Language 49(3): 612–639.
Cheng, Winnie & Warren, Martin
2001‘She kows more about Hong Kong than you do isn’t it’: Tags in Hong Kong conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 33(9): 1419–1439.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Clift, Rebecca
2015Stance in the sequence: Laughter as a negative stance marker (Contribution to stance and footing in interaction, organized by Clift Rebecca & Elizabeth Holt), Presentation at IPRA, Antwerp, Belgium. 26–31 July.
1998Prosody in interactional discourse. In Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Matti Miestamo (eds), 7–40. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Tryckeri.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
1996Prosody in Conversation [Interactional studies 12]. Cambridge: CUP.
Cruttenden, Alan
1997Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Cruttenden, Alan
1986Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.
Crystal, David
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
Crystal, David
1975The English Tone of Voice. Essays in Intonation, Prosody and Paralanguage. London: Arnold.
Cuenca, Maria
1997Form-use mappings for tag questions. In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, Wolf-Andreas Liebert & Gisela Redeker (eds), 3–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Culicover, Peter
1992English tag questions in universal grammar. Lingua 88: 193–226.
Davies, Eirian
1979On the Semantics of Syntax. Mood and Condition in English. London: Croom Helm London and Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382.
Demirezen, Mehmet
2014The tag questions: Certainty versus uncertainty issue in English pitches and intonation in relation to anthropology. Anthropologist 18(3): 1059–1067.
Dennis, Maureen, Sugar, Judith & Whitaker, Harry
1982The acquisition of tag questions. Child Development: 1254–1257.
2006English Grammar: A University Course, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Drew, Paul
2012What drives sequences?Research of Language and Social Interaction 45: 61–68.
Du Bois John, Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, & Paolino, Danae
1992Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Vol 4: Discourse Transcription. Santa Barbara CA: University of California.
Du Bois, John
2007The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isabel
1975The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they?Language in Society 4(3): 289–294.
Farkas, Donka
2015Semantics and pragmatics of assertions and questions. LOT Summer school course given from June 22 to June 26 2015 at KU Leuven, Belgium.
Fillmore, Charles
1984Remarks on contrastive pragmatics. In Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 119–141. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fischer, Kerstin
2000From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fischer, Kerstin
2003Notes on analysing context. In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 114], Peter Kühlein, Hannes Rieser & Henk Zeevat (eds), 193–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, Kerstin
2007Grounding and common ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds [Studies in Pragmatics 3], Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fischer, Kerstin & Alm, Maria
2013A radical Construction Grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 47–87.
Fischer, Kerstin & Drescher, Martina
1996Methods for the description of discourse particles: Contrastive analysis. Language Sciences 18(3): 853–861.
Fishman, Pamela
1980Conversational insecurity. In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, Howard Giles, Peter Robinson & Philip Smith (eds), 127–132. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara & Thompson, Sandra
2003Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language [Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure 2], Michael Tomasello (ed), 119–144. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ford, Cecilia E.
1993Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP.
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Lieselotte & Van de Velde, Freek
2012Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification. In Intersections of IntersubjectivityLiselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds). [Special issue of English Text Construction 5(1): 128–152.
Glenn, Phillip
2003Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Gómez, Pascual Cantos
2013Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Leeds: Equinox.
1983Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19(2): 377–417.
Gussenhoven, Carlos
1984On The Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Halliday, Michael
1967Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
Halliday, Michael
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaia
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, Michael & Matthiessen, Christian
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael & Greaves, William
2008Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
Harres, Annette
1998“But basically you’re feeling well, are you?”: Tag questions in medical consultations. Health Communication 10(2): 111–123.
Harris, Patricia H.
1972The use of tag questions, tag-like responses, and non-tags. Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, 62–82.
Haselow, Alexander
2012Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 31: 182–204.
Hay, Jennifer
2001The pragmatics of humor support. Humor 14(1): 55–82.
Hengeveld, Kees
1989Layers and operators in functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25: 127–157.
Heritage, John
1984A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John
1998Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27: 291–334.
Heritage, John
2011Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds), 159–183. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John
2012The epistemic engine. Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research of Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52.
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey
2005The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.
2014Canonical tag questions in Asian Englishes: Forms, functions and frequencies in Hong Kong English, Indian English and Singapore English. In The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds), 697–714. Oxford: OUP.
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2006Tag questions in early and late modern English. Historical description and theoretical implications. Anglistik 17(2): 35–55.
Holmes, Janet
1983The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3: 40–65.
Holmes, Janet
1984Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8(3): 345–364.
Holmes, Janet
1995Women, Men and Politeness. White Plains NY: Longman.
Hosman, Lawrence & Siltanen, Susan
2011Hedges, tag questions, message processing, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(30): 341–349.
Houck, Noel
1991Tag questions: a necessary pragmatic context. In Pragmatic and Language Learning, Lawrence Bouton & Yamulra Kachru (eds), 29–38. Urbana IL: Deil.
Houck, Noel
1995Pragmatic constraints on constant-polarity tag questions. Paper presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics in March, 1995 at Long Beach CA.
Huddleston, Rodney
1970Two approaches to the analysis of tags. Journal of Linguistics 6: 215–222.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hudson, Richard
1975The meaning of questions. Language 51(1): 1–31.
2003Interactive aspects of vague language in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769.
Karttunen, Lauri & Peters, Stanley
1975Conventional implicature in Montague Grammar. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Cathy Cogen, Henry Thompson, Graham Thurgood, Kenneth Whistler & James Wright (eds), 266–278. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Kay, Paul
2002English subjectless tagged sentences. Language 78: 456–481.
Keisanen, Tiina
2006Patterns of Stance Taking. Negative Yes/No Interrogatives and Tag Questions in American English Conversation. PhD Dissertation, University of Oulu.
Kim, Jong-Bok & Ann, Ji-Young
2008English tag questions: Corpus findings and theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics 25: 103–126.
Kimps, Ditte
2007Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 270–291.
Kimps, Ditte & Davidse, Kristin
2008Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: A typology. Text and Talk 28: 699–722.
Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin & Cornillie, Bert
2014aA speech function analysis of Britisch English tag questions in spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 64–85.
Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin & Cornillie, Bert
2014bThe speech functions of tag questions and their properties. A comparison of their distribution in COLT and LLC. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63], Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 321–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1978Englische ’Question Tags’ und ihre deutschen Entsprechungen. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel 10: 61–77.
Kohler, Klaus J.
2013From communicative functions to prosodic forms. Phonetica 70(1–2): 24–65.
König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker
2012Understanding English-German Contrasts [Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 29]. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Kreiman, Jody
1982Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries in natural conversation. Journal of Phonetics 10: 163–175.
Kreuz, Roger, Kassler, Max, Coppenrath, Lori & McLain Allen, Bonnie
1999Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1685–1698.
Krug, Manfred
1998British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23(2): 145–197.
Labov, William
1972The study of language in its social context. In Language and Social Context, Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed), 283–307. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Labov, William & Fanshel, David
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.
Ladd, D. Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Chicago Linguistic Society 17: 164–171.
Ladd, D. Robert
1986Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3: 311–340.
1969Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lindström, Jan
2009Interactional linguistics. In The Pragmatics of Interaction [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 4], Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Jola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 96–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lukácsi, Zoltán
2009Language and gender: How question tags are classified and characterised in current EFL materials. In UPRT 2008: Empirical Studies in English Applied Linguistics, Réka Lugossy, József Horváth & Marianne Nikolov (eds), 191–205. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.
1991Tag questions and their answers in Sangir. In Studies in Sulawesi Linguistics VI [[URL]], Wyn D. Laidig (ed), 84–94. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
McCarthy, John
1990Formalization of two puzzles involving knowledge. In Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy, Vladimir Lifschitz (ed), 158–166. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
McCawley, James D.
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McGregor, William
1995aJa hear that didja?: Interrogative Tags in Australian English. Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 36: 3–35.
McGregor, William
1995bThe English ‘Tag Question’: A new analysis, is(n’t) it? In On Subject and Theme. A Discourse Functional Perspective [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory], Ruquiya Hasan & Peter H. Fries (eds), 91–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2001bSubjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383–400.
O’Connor, Joseph
1955The intonation of tag questions in English. English Studies 36(1): 97–105.
O’Connor, Joseph & Arnold, Gordon
1961Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Bloomsbury.
O’Grady, Gerard
2013Key Concepts in Phonetics and Phonology. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oleksy, Wieslaw
1977Tags in English and equivalent constructions in Polish. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 7: 95–109.
Östman, Jan-Ola
1981A functional approach to English tags. Studia Anglica Posnaniensa 13: 3–16.
Palacios Martínez Ignacio,
2015Variation, development and pragmatic uses of innit in the language of British adults and teenagers. English Language and Linguistics 19(3): 383–405.
Palmer, Frank
1976The English Verb. London: Longman.
Palmer, Frank
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.
Parviainen, Hanna
2016The invariant tag isn’t it in Asian Englishes. World Englishes 35(1): 98–117.
1990The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds), 271–311. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pike, Kenneth
1945The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Pittner, Karin
2007Common ground in interaction: The functions of medial doch in German. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds [Studies in Pragmatics 3], Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pope, Emily
1976Questions and Answers in English. The Hague: Mouton.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
R Development Core Team
2008R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Ramírez Verdugo, Dolores & Trillo Romero, Jesus
2005The pragmatic function of intonation in L2 discourse: English tag questions used by Spanish speakers. Intercultural Pragmatics 2(2): 151–168.
Rando, Emily
1980Intonation in discourse. In The Melody of Language, Linda R. Waugh & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 243–278. Baltimore MD: University Park Press. Reprinted from Pope, Emily Norwood, Questions and Answers in English, The Hague: Mouton.
Reese, Brian & Asher, Nicholas
2008Prosody and the interpretation of tag questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, Estela Puig-Waldmüller (ed), 448–462. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Roesle, Andrea
2001Tag Questions in British and American English: A Matter of Gender, Regional Dialect and Pragmatics. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Zurich.
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
Sadock, Jerrold
1974Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York NY: Academic Press.
Salmon, Vivian
1987aElizabethan colloquial English in the Falstaff plays. In A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 35], Vivian Salmon & Edwina Burness (eds), 37–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Salmon, Vivian
1987bSentence structures in colloquial Shakespearian English. In A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 35], Salmon, Vivian & Burness, Edwina (eds), 265–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sankoff, Gillian
2006Age: Apparent time and real time. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2, Keith Brown & Anne Anderson (eds). Oxford: Elsevier.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Sandra A. Thompson & Emanuel Schegloff (eds), 52–133. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1997Whose text? Whose context?Discourse & Society 8(2): 165–187.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP.
Schiffer, Stephen
1972Meaning. Oxford: OUP.
Schoonjans, Steven
2014Modalpartikeln als Multimodale Konstruktionen. Eine Korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
Searle, John
1975Speech acts and recent linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 263: 27–38.
Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya
2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Siertsema, Berthe
1980Sidelights on tag questions. In The Melody of Language, Linda R. Waugh & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 299–314. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Aijmer, Karin
2007The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter.Berlin:
1978Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics [Pragmatics 9], Peter Cole (ed), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press.
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1984Questions and Responses in English Conversation [Lund Studies in English 68]. Lund: Liber/Gleerups.
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1994An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.
Stenström, Anna-Brita & Andersen, Gisle
1996More trends in teenage talk: A corpus-based investigation of the discourse items cos and innit. In Synchronic Corpus Linguistics, Carol Percy, Charles Meyer & Ian Lancashire (eds), 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2010A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2620–2626.
Stivers, Tanya & Rossano, Federico
2010Mobilizing sequence. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 3–31.
Svartvik, Jan
1990The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.
Takahashi, Mariko
2014A comparative study of tag questions in four Asian Englishes from a corpus-based approach. Asian Englishes 16(2): 101–124.
Tench, Paul
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassel.
Tench, Paul
1990The Roles of Intonation in English Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Thomason, Richmond
1992Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Intentions in Communication, Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds), 325–363. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Thompson, Paul
1989The “same way”question tag. Studies in English Language and Literature 29(3): 61–79.
Torgersen, Eivind, Gabrielatos, Costas, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Fox, Sue
2011A corpus-based study of pragmatic markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 93–118.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
2006Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 283–311.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
2009aTag questions in English The first Century. Journal of English Linguistics 37: 130–161.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
2009bTag questions as markers of stance in written English. In Corpora and Discourse and Stuff. Papers in Honour of Karin Aijmer [Gothenburg Studies in English], Rhonwen Bowen, Mats Mobärg & Sölve Ohlander (eds). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Gothenburg:
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2002Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19(1): 77–120.
Ukaji, Masatomo
1998Tag questions in Early Modern English. Paper presented at 10th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Manchester, UK.
Valenzuela Farías, Maria Gabriela
2013A comparative analysis of intonation between Spanish and English speakers in tag questions, Wh-questions, inverted questions, and repetition questions. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada 13(4): 1061–1083.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1505–1528.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1978A Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vol. 3 . Leiden: Brill.
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Weckerly, Jill, Wulfeck, Beverly & Reilly, Judy
2004The development of morphosyntactic ability in atypical populations: The acquisition of tag questions in children with early focal lesions and children with specific-language impairment. Brain and Language 88(2): 190–201.
Weydt, Harald & Berlin, West
1983Partikeln und Interaktion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wichmann, Anne
2007Can English tag questions grammaticalise?Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Français 28: 349–357.
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. Harlow: Longman.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winefield, Helen, Chandler, Margaret & Bassett, Darryl
1989Tag questions and powerfulness: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of a course of psychotherapy. Language in Society 18(1): 77–86.
Wong, May L-y
2007Tag questions in Hong Kong English: A corpus-based study. Asian Englishes 10(1): 44–61.
Wong, Jock
2008Anglo English and Singapore English tags: Their meanings and cultural significance. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(1): 88–117.