Part of
Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes
Edited by Alexandra U. Esimaje, Ulrike Gut and Bassey E. Antia
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 88] 2019
► pp. 3770
References
Adeyemi, Remilkun
2017A Corpus-based Analysis of Cohesion in Written English Essays by Nigerian Students. PhD dissertation, North-West University.Google Scholar
Awonusi, Victor
1990Coming of age: English in Nigeria. English Today 22: 31–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Awonusi, Victor O.
1994The Americanization of Nigerian English. World Englishes 13(1): 75–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Awonusi, Victor
2007Good Spoken English and national development: Sociophonology in the service of man. Inaugural lecture held at the University of Lagos, March 14.Google Scholar
Baskaran, Loga
2004Malaysian English: Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 1047–1063. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beal, John
2004English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 134–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Branford, Jean & Venter, Malcolm
2016Say Again? The Other Side of South African English. Cape Town: Pharos.Google Scholar
Brato, Thorsten
2018‘Outdooring’ the Historical Corpus of English in Ghana. English Today 34: 25–34.Google Scholar
Chen, Danqi & Manning, Christopher D.
2014A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2014, Doha Quatar, Allesandro Moschitti & Walter Daelemans (eds). Stroudsburg PA: ACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, Becky & Wolfram, Walt
2004Bahamian English: Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 643–656. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra
2004The legacy of British and Irish English in Newfoundland. In Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 242–261. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia
2011The Present Perfect in Non-native Englishes: A Corpus-based Study of Variation. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, Vivian
2003The language of truth and reconciliation: Was it fair to all concerned? Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 21(1–2): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Corpus Linguistics and World Englishes: An Analysis of Xhosa-English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
De Kock, Leon
1996Civilising Barbarians: Missionary Narrative and African Textual Response in Nineteenth-century South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana
2014Sociolinguistics and Mobile Communication. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Hardy, Jack
2014Corpus-based Sociolinguistics a Guide for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert
2016The frequency of the present perfect in varieties of English around the World. In Re-Assessing the Present Perfect, Valentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds), 223–258. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Robert, Götz, Sandra & Werner, Valentin
2016The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In Re-Assessing the Present Perfect, Valentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds), 297–337. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneuax, Fanny Meunier & Magali Paquot
(eds) 2009International Corpus of Learner English (Version 2). Louvain: UCL Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sydney & Nelson, Gerald
1996The International Corpus of Englisch (ICE) project. World Englishes 15(1): 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan
2013Statistics for linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction, 2nd edn. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2016Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike & Fuchs, Robert
2013Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics 41(3): 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Exploring speaker fluency with phonologically annotated ICE corpora. World Englishes 36(3): 387–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike & Voormann, Holger
2014Corpus Design. In The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut & Gjert Kristoffersen (eds), 13–26. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M.
2004Regional characteristics of Australian English: phonology. In Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, 625–644. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hudson-Ettle, Diane M. & Schmied, Josef
1999Manual to Accompany the East African Component of the International Corpus of English. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology, Department of English. Web: [URL]
Hughes, Arthur & Trudgill, Peter
1987English Accents and Dialects, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Chris
2003On compiling a corpus of South African English. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 21(4): 341–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Eldred
1971Krio: An English-based language of Sierra Leone. In The English Language in West Africa, John Spencer (ed.), 66–94. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Randolph Quirk & Henry Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Krause, Thomas & Zeldes, Amir
2014ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Literary and Linguistic Computing 31(1): 118–139.Google Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus
2017Editorial practice and the distinction between error and conventionalised innovation in New Englishes: The progressive in Black South African English. World Englishes 36(1): 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1992Corpus linguistics and theories of linguistic performance. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm 4–8 August 1991, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 105–122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
Mair, Christian
2013Corpus approaches to the New English web: Post-colonial diasporic forums in West Africa and the Caribbean. Covenant Journal of Language Studies 1(1): 17–31.Google Scholar
Marungudzi, Thadeus
2017Selected Morphosyntactic Features and Variety Status of Zimbabwean English: A Corpus-based Approach. PhD dissertation, North-West University.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew
2012Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane, Minow, Verena & Morreira, Kirsten
2009The Corpus of Black and Coloured South African English in Contact.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend
1992aEnglish in Language Shift. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992bA Lexicon of South African Indian English. Leeds: Peepal Tree Press.Google Scholar
2008Synopsis: The phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In Varieties of English, Vol. 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 307–319. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nkemleke, Daniel
2011Exploring Academic Writing in Cameroon English: A Corpus-based Perspective. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
2012The expression of modality in Cameroon English. In Language Contact in a Post-colonial Setting: The Linguistic and Social Context of English and Pidgin in Cameroon, Eric A. Achimbe (ed.), 29–62. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossouw, Ronel & Van Rooy, Bertus
2012Diachronic changes in Modality in South African English. English World-Wide 33(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiel, Florian
2004MAUS goes iterative. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lissabon, Vol. 3, Maria Teresa Lino (ed.), 1015–1018. Paris.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef
1990Corpus linguistics and non-native varieties of English. World Englishes 9(3): 255–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991English in Africa. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simo Bobda, Augustin
2007Some Segmental rules of Nigerian English phonology. English World-Wide 28 (3): 279–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004The dialect of East Anglia. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 163–177. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Udofot, Inyang & Mbarachi, Chibuike S.
2016Social media English in Nigeria. Research Journal of English Language and Literature 4(2): 775–784.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive
2004Synopsis: Phonological variation in the British Isles. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 1063–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus
2006The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25(1): 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Kruger, Haidee
2018Hybridity, globalisation and models of Englishes: English in South African multilingual digital repertoires. In Modelling World Englishes in the 21st Century: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties [Varieties of English around the World G61], Sandra Deshors (ed.), 77–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Piotrowska, Caroline
2015The development of an extended time period meaning of the progressive in Black South African English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67], Peter Collins (ed.), 465–483. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Terblanche, Lize
2010Complexity in word-formation processes in New Varieties of South African English. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 28(4): 357–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisser, Martin
2016Practical Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Corpus-based Language Analysis. Chichester: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin & Fuchs, Robert
2017The present perfect in Nigerian English. English Language and Linguistics 21(1): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John
1982Accents of English, 3 Vols. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Hans-Georg & Polzenhagen, Frank
2009World Englishes: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunder, Eva-Maria, Voormann, Holger & Gut, Ulrike
2010The ICE Nigeria corpus project: Creating an open, rich and accurate corpus. ICAME Journal 34: 78–88.Google Scholar
Yao, Xinyue & Collins, Peter
2012The present perfect in World Englishes. World Englishes 31(3): 386–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Botha, Werner, Bertus van Rooy & Susan Coetzee‐van Rooy
2021. South African Englishes: A contemporary bibliography. World Englishes 40:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Buregeya, Alfred
2022. How real has the long-anticipated fast-growing influence of American English on Kenyan English been?. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:2  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter Craig
2022. Comment markers in world Englishes. World Englishes 41:2  pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Sebastian & Sabine Arndt-Lappe
2021. Better data for more researchers – using the audio features of BNCweb. ICAME Journal 45:1  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3  pp. 298 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.