Chapter 6
“It is not just a fact that the law requires this, but it is a reasonable fact”
Using the Noun that-pattern to explore stance construction in legal writing
This chapter investigates the construction of stance through nouns in two legal genres: academic journals and judicial opinions. The study builds on previous research into stance construal in judicial discourse which focuses on nouns followed by a that-clause complement. Nouns found in this pattern indicate the epistemic status of the proposition expressed in the that-clause and they are used to evaluate the reliability of propositions contained in the that-clause (e.g., the assumption that … is incorrect). The present analysis of the Noun that-pattern highlights its dependence on both genre- and discipline-specific factors. It reveals disciplinary similarities in the choice of noun and the dominance of the authority-building function in both legal academic enquiry and judicial argumentation. Genre-oriented differences are found, for example, in the higher frequencies in judicial corpora of ‘certainty’ nouns (e.g., fact) and ‘communication’ nouns (e.g., argument).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The concepts of evaluation and stance in legal discourse
- 3.Stance, status and the noun that-pattern
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Overview of nouns + that-clause in the three corpora
- 5.1.1Epistemic nouns expressing certainty
- 5.1.1.1Fact
- 5.1.1.2Conclusion
- 5.1.2Epistemic nouns indicating likelihood
- 6.Summary and conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References
Alba-Juez, Laura & Thompson, Geoff
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Breeze, Ruth
2011 Disciplinary values in legal discourse: A corpus-based study.
Ibérica 21: 93–116.
Breeze, Ruth
2018 Giving voice to the law. Speech act verbs in legal academic writing. In
Goźdź-Roszkowski &
Pontrandolfo (eds), 221–239.
Breeze, Ruth, Gotti, Maurizio & Sancho-Guinda Carmen
(eds) 2014 Interpersonality in Legal Genres. Bern: Peter Lang.
DiMatteo, Larry
2015 Legal justification in Anglo-American Common Law. In
Uzasadnienia decyzji stosowania prawa (Justifications in decision-making process),
Iwona Rzucidło-Grochowska &
Mateusz Grochowski (eds), 512–524. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
Finegan, Edward
2010 Corpus linguistic approaches to ‘Legal language’: adverbial expression of attitude and emphasis in Supreme Court opinions. In
The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics,
Malcolm Coulthard &
Alison Johnson (eds), 65–77. London: Routledge.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011 Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2018a Facts in law. A comparative study of fact that and its phraseologies in American and Polish judicial discourse. In
Goźdź-Roszkowski &
Pontrandolfo (eds), 143–159.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Hunston, Susan
2016 Corpora and beyond – investigating evaluation in discourse: Introduction to the Special Issue on Corpus Approaches to Evaluation
.
Corpora 11(2): 131–141.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
2013 Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: A corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments.
International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 13(2): 9–69.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
2014 Facing the facts: Evaluative patterns in English and Italian judicial language. In
Language and Law in Professional Discourse. Issues and Perspectives,
Vijay Bhatia,
Guliana Garzone &
Rita Salvi (eds) 10–28. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
(eds) 2018 Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings. A Corpus-based Interdisciplinary Perspective. London: Routledge.
Hafner, Christoph A.
2014 Stance in a professional legal genre. The barrister’s opinion. In
Breeze, Gotti &
Sancho-Guinda (eds), 137–160.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian
2004 [1985] An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
Heffer, Chris
2007 Judgement in court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. In
Language and the Law: International Outlooks,
Krzysztof Kredens &
Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski (eds), 45–179. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hunston, Susan
2011 Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
Jiang, Feng & Hyland, Ken
2015 ‘
The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing.
Discourse Studies 17(5): 529–550.
Klinck, Dennis R.
1992 The Word of the Law: Approaches to Legal Discourse. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Marín Pérez, María José & Rea Rizzo, Camino
2012 Structure and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): A legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK.
Journal of English Studies 10: 131–145.
Mazzi, Davide
2007 The rhetoric of judicial texts: The interplay of reported argumentation and the judge’s argumentative voice. In
Discourse, Ideology and Specialized Communication,
Giuliana Garzone &
Srikant Sarangi (eds), 379–399. Bern: Peter Lang.
Mazzi, Davide
2008 “
I first have to decide whether there were any notes in the first place. I consider that there probably were”: Adverbials of stance in equity judges’ argumentation.
Textus 21: 505–522.
Mazzi, Davide
2010 “
This argument fails for two reasons…” A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23(4): 373–385.
Mazzi, Davide
2014 “The words are plain and clear…”: On interpersonal positioning in the discourse of judicial interpretation. In
Breeze, Gotti &
Sancho-Guinda (eds), 39–62.
Mertz, Elizabeth
2007 The Language of Law School: Learning to Think Like a Lawyer. Oxford: OUP.
Pounds, Gabrina
2013 Genre- and culture-specific aspects of evaluation: Insights from the contrastive analysis of English and Italian online property advertising. In
Contrastive Discourse Analysis. Functional and Corpus Perspectives,
Maite Taboada,
Susana Doval Suárez &
Elsa González Álvarez (eds), 240–261. Sheffield: Equinox.
Sala, Michele
2014 Interpersonal and interactional markers in legal research articles. In
Breeze, Gotti &
Sancho-Guinda (eds), 113–136.
Sancho-Guinda, Carmen, Gotti, Maurizio & Breeze, Ruth
2014 Framing interpersonality in law texts. In
Breeze, Gotti &
Sancho-Guinda (eds), 9–35.
Solan, Lawrence
1993 The Language of Judges. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2014 Stancetaking strategies in judicial discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court opinions.
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 131: 1–30.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Daniel, Florence Oluwaseyi
2024.
That-complement clauses signalling stance in Nigerian Supreme Court lead judgements: a corpus-based study.
International Journal of Legal Discourse 0:0
Daniel, Florence Oluwaseyi & Foluke Olayinka Unuabonah
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.