Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse
Edited by Teresa Fanego and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91] 2019
► pp. 123146
Alba-Juez, Laura & Thompson, Geoff
2014The many faces of evaluation. In Evaluation in Context, Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006University Language. A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2011Disciplinary values in legal discourse: A corpus-based study. Ibérica 21: 93–116.Google Scholar
2018Giving voice to the law. Speech act verbs in legal academic writing. In Goźdź-Roszkowski & Pontrandolfo (eds), 221–239.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth, Gotti, Maurizio & Sancho-Guinda Carmen
(eds) 2014Interpersonality in Legal Genres. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DiMatteo, Larry
2015Legal justification in Anglo-American Common Law. In Uzasadnienia decyzji stosowania prawa (Justifications in decision-making process), Iwona Rzucidło-Grochowska & Mateusz Grochowski (eds), 512–524. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John
2007The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert. (ed), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed) 2007Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward
2010Corpus linguistic approaches to ‘Legal language’: adverbial expression of attitude and emphasis in Supreme Court opinions. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, Malcolm Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds), 65–77. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018aFacts in law. A comparative study of fact that and its phraseologies in American and Polish judicial discourse. In Goźdź-Roszkowski & Pontrandolfo (eds), 143–159.Google Scholar
2018bBetween corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to textual recurrence. Exploring semantic sequences in judicial discourse. In Patterns in Text: Corpus-driven Methods and Applications [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82], Joanna Kopaczyk & Jukka Tyrkko (eds),131–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Hunston, Susan
2016Corpora and beyond – investigating evaluation in discourse: Introduction to the Special Issue on Corpus Approaches to Evaluation . Corpora 11(2): 131–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
2013Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: A corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments. International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 13(2): 9–69.Google Scholar
2014Facing the facts: Evaluative patterns in English and Italian judicial language. In Language and Law in Professional Discourse. Issues and Perspectives, Vijay Bhatia, Guliana Garzone & Rita Salvi (eds) 10–28. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(eds) 2018Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings. A Corpus-based Interdisciplinary Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hafner, Christoph A.
2014Stance in a professional legal genre. The barrister’s opinion. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 137–160.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian
2004 [1985]An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heffer, Chris
2007Judgement in court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. In Language and the Law: International Outlooks, Krzysztof Kredens & Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski (eds), 45–179. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
2000Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng & Hyland, Ken
2015 ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies 17(5): 529–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klinck, Dennis R.
1992The Word of the Law: Approaches to Legal Discourse. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
Marín Pérez, María José & Rea Rizzo, Camino
2012Structure and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): A legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK. Journal of English Studies 10: 131–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzi, Davide
2007The rhetoric of judicial texts: The interplay of reported argumentation and the judge’s argumentative voice. In Discourse, Ideology and Specialized Communication, Giuliana Garzone & Srikant Sarangi (eds), 379–399. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008 “I first have to decide whether there were any notes in the first place. I consider that there probably were”: Adverbials of stance in equity judges’ argumentation. Textus 21: 505–522.Google Scholar
2010 “This argument fails for two reasons…” A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23(4): 373–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014“The words are plain and clear…”: On interpersonal positioning in the discourse of judicial interpretation. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 39–62.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth
2007The Language of Law School: Learning to Think Like a Lawyer. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina
2013Genre- and culture-specific aspects of evaluation: Insights from the contrastive analysis of English and Italian online property advertising. In Contrastive Discourse Analysis. Functional and Corpus Perspectives, Maite Taboada, Susana Doval Suárez & Elsa González Álvarez (eds), 240–261. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sala, Michele
2014Interpersonal and interactional markers in legal research articles. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 113–136.Google Scholar
Sancho-Guinda, Carmen, Gotti, Maurizio & Breeze, Ruth
2014Framing interpersonality in law texts. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 9–35.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence
1993The Language of Judges. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2014Stancetaking strategies in judicial discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court opinions. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 131: 1–30.Google Scholar