Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse
Edited by Teresa Fanego and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91] 2019
► pp. 149–169

Are law reports an ‘agile’ or an ‘uptight’ register?

Tracking patterns of historical change in the use of colloquial and complexity features

| Northern Arizona University
| Iowa State University
Language change is a natural evolutionary process, and as a result it is reasonable to expect that all registers will undergo historical change to some extent. While some registers adopt linguistic innovations readily, others resist such changes and exhibit more conservative patterns of change. This chapter considers the extent to which law reports have adopted linguistic innovations observed in other written registers (fiction, newspapers, and science prose). The analysis considers features related to two competing factors influencing historical change in written texts: popularization (the adoption of colloquial features associated with the need to write texts for a large and general population of readers) and economy (increases in the use of phrasal complexity features to create informationally-dense texts for specialist readers). The analysis shows that compared to other written registers, law reports have been relatively conservative and resistant to historical change. These results are interpreted relative to the situational and communicative characteristics of law reports.
Keywords: language change, legal discourse, popularization, economy
Published online: 06 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91.07bib
References

References

Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2003 Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In New Media Language, Jean Aitchison & Diana Lewis (eds), 169–183. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006 University Language. A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad Susan
2009 Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, & Reppen, Randi
1998 Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1989 Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65: 487–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. (Reprinted in Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds) 2001 pp.66–83).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2010 Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 314–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jones, James K.
2008 Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1286–1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas
(eds) 2001 Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván
2017 The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41: 53–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena
2012 Democratisation. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael
2002 Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bohmann, Axel
2015  Which-hunting and the standard English relative clause. Language 91(4): 806–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999 “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
1997 The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. In Corpus-Based Studies in English. Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996, Magnus Ljung (ed), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2006 Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar