The Trinity Lancaster Corpus
Applications in language teaching and materials development
Corpora and corpus techniques have long been an important source of knowledge about language; they have also been increasingly used for language teaching purposes. This chapter discusses the role of spoken learner corpora in language pedagogy and in development of language teaching materials. In particular, it focuses on the Trinity Lancaster Corpus (TLC) and its pedagogical applications. With over four million words, the TLC is one of the largest corpora of L2 spoken English, representing language from L2 English speakers engaged in different speaking tasks. The chapter uses data from the TLC to illustrate the use of corpus findings in teaching pragmatics in spoken language use, focusing on three case studies: expression of disagreement, ability to adjust language choice according to linguistic setting, and engaged listenership.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Description of the resource
- 2.1Corpus overview
- 2.1.1The nature of interaction: Linguistic setting and the speaking tasks
- 2.1.2Linguistic and cultural background
- 2.1.3Proficiency in spoken English
- 2.1.4Sociolinguistic characteristics: Age, gender and education
- 2.1.5Learning experience: Age of acquisition, learning history and patterns of use
- 2.2Accessing and searching the TLC
- 3.Issues in the corpus analysis of learner language
- 3.1Transcription: Capturing spoken learner language
- 3.2Comparison of (sub)corpora
- 4.Applications of spoken learner corpora in language teaching
- 4.1The use of spoken corpora in language teaching
- 4.2Using learner corpora in language teaching
- 5.Using the TLC for pedagogical purposes
- 5.1Comparison across proficiency levels: Expression of disagreement
- Corpus findings
- Pedagogical implications
- 5.2Comparison across tasks: Ability to adjust linguistic choice according to situation
- Corpus findings
- Pedagogical implications
- 5.3Comparison between less and more successful learners: Active and engaged listenership
- Corpus findings
- Pedagogical implications
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (55)
References
Adolphs, Svenja & Knight, Dawn. 2010. Building a spoken corpus. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keefe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 38–52. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, Mossman, Sabrina, & Vellenga, Heidi E. 2014. Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL Journal 6(3): 499–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennett, Gena R. 2010. Using Corpora in the Language Learning Classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. Ann Arbor IN: University of Michigan Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Callies, Marcus. 2015. Using learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Current practice and future challenges. In Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and Applications for Foreign Language Teaching and Assessment, Erik K. Castello, Katherine Ackerley & Francesca Coccetta (eds), 21–35. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlsen, Cecilie. 2012. Proficiency level – A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, Angela. 2015. The learner corpus as a pedagogic corpus. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 445–464. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Council of Europe. 2011. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe. <[URL]> (28 May 2018).
Cullen, Richard & Kuo, I-Chun. 2007. Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: a missing link? TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 361–386. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004. The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in French as a foreign language: An overview. Journal of French Language Studies 14(3): 301–319. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1991. Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 1(1): 71–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farr, Fiona. 2003. Engaged listenership in spoken academic discourse: the case of student-tutor meetings. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(1): 67–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuchs, Robert, Götz, Sandra & Werner, Valentin. 2016. The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In Re-Assessing the Present Perfect, Valentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds), 297–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana. 2014. Areas of difference between more and less successful candidates in GESE at Grades 7 and 8. Commissioned report. Trinity College London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana & Brezina, Vaclav. 2015. Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 117–136. Berlin: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana & Brezina, Vaclav. 2017. Disagreement in L2 spoken English: From learner corpus research to corpus-based teaching materials. In Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 69–89. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning 67(S1): 155–179. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav, McEnery, Tony, & Boyd, Elaine. 2017. Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics 38(1): 613–637. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav, & McEnery, Tony. In preparation.
The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description and application.
Gilmore, Alex. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58(4): 363–374. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie, & Granger, Sylviane. 2010. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, Sylviane. 2004. Computer learner corpus research: Current state and future prospects. In Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 123–145. Amsterdam: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ishihara, Noriko & Cohen, Andrew D. 2014. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jarvis, Scott & Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. Cross-linguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, Christian, Byrne, Shelly & Halenko, Nicola. 2017. Successful Spoken English: Findings from Learner Corpora. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Mehlmauer-Larcher, Barbara. 2005. Computer corpora and the language classroom: On the potential limitations of computer corpora in language teaching. ReCALL 16(1): 65–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Gabriele & Rose, Kenneth R. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning 50(4): 675–724. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Limberg, Holger. 2016. Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research 20(6): 700–718. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, Michael & O’Keeffe, Anne. 2004. Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 26–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew. 2011. Corpus linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard. 2011. What corpora can offer in language teaching and learning. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Eli Hinkel (ed.), 364–380. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2006. Corpus linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art – and beyond. English Corpus Linguistics 3: 5–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Keeffe, Anne, McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Pochon-Berger, Evelyne. 2011. Developing “methods” for interaction: a cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann & Simona Pekarek Doehler (eds), 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reppen, Randi. 2010. Using Corpora in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roever, Carsten. 2010. Effects of cultural background in a test of ESL pragmalinguistics: A DIF approach. In Pragmatics Language Learning, Gabriele Kasper, Hanh T. Nguyen, Dina R. Yoshimi & Jim K. Yoshioka (eds), 187–212. Honolulu HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Römer, Ute. 2010. Using general and specialized corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching, Maria C. Campoy, Begoña Belles-Fortuno & Maria Lluisa (eds), 18–35. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rose, Kenneth R. 2005. On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33(3): 385–399. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 289–310. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thonus, Terese. 2007. Listener responses as a pragmatic resource for learners of English. The CATESOL Journal 19(1): 132–145.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Timmis, Ivor. 2002. Native-speaker norms and International English: A classroom view. ELT Journal 56(3): 240–249. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Timmis, Ivor. 2015. Corpus Linguistics for ELT: Research and Practice. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trinity College London. 2016. Exam Information: Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE). <[URL]> along with videos of the speaking tasks (28 May 2018).
Usó-Juan, Esther. 2007. The presentation and practice of the communicative act of requesting in textbooks: Focusing on modifiers. In Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, Eva A. Soler & Maria P. Safont Jordà (eds), 223–243. Berlin: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vellenga, Heidi. 2004. Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely. TESL-EJ 8(2): 1–17.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English. Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; Researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk-Teasdale, Marie-Luise Pitzl, Michael Radeka. <[URL]> (28 May 2018).
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1980. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wall, Diane & Taylor, Cathy. 2014. Communicative Language Testing (CLT): Reflections on the “Issues Revisited” from the perspective of an examinations board. Language Assessment Quarterly 11(2): 170–185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walsh, Steve. 2010. What features of spoken and written corpora can be exploited in creating language teaching materials and syllabuses. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keefe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 333–345. Abingdon: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
Valenzuela, Hannah
2020.
Pragmatics. In
Linguistics for TESOL,
► pp. 155 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.