Chapter published in:
Learner Corpora and Language Teaching
Edited by Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92] 2019
► pp. 129–153

Direct quotation in second language writing

A corpus-based study of intertextuality in academic learner English

| University of Bremen, Germany

Though the explicit reference to prior literature in the field is considered a characteristic feature of academic writing, there is a notable lack of corpus-linguistic research into the manifestations of intertextuality, especially in L2 academic writing (Keck 2015). This contribution explores L2 writers’ use of direct quotation in real-life disciplinary assignments. It presents a learner corpus-based study investigating the form, textual integration, and attribution of direct quotes in research papers written by advanced German learners of English. The study shows that at the advanced undergraduate level, L2 writers are familiar with formal aspects of direct quotation and conventions of intertextuality. However, insecurities with regard to length, syntactic integration, and purpose of direct quotes remain that need to be addressed in teaching.

Published online: 06 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.07wie
References

References

Borg, Erik
2000 Citation practices in academic writing. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practices, Paul Thompson (ed.), 27–45. Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus & Ekaterina Zaytseva
2013 The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE) – A new resource for the assessment of writing proficiency in the academic register. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1): 126–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Cherry
1990 Writing with others’ words: Using background reading text in academic compositions. In Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom, Barbara Kroll (ed.), 211–230. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasoma, Ranamukalage, Thompson, Celia, & Pennycook, Alistair
2004 Beyond plagiarism. Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 3(3): 171–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Yeon Hee
2016 Writing strategies in the process of L2 computer-mode academic writing with the use of multiple resources. English Teaching 71(3): 3–28.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Richard J.
1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4): 764–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Mary
2013 The development of source use by international postgraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(2): 125–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Plonsky, Luke
2015 Success in the abstract: Linguistic and stylistic predictors of conference abstract ratings. Corpora 10(3): 291–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, Alan & Du, Qian
2013 ‘Why am I paraphrasing?’: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(2): 87–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2002 Activity and evaluation. Reporting practices in academic writing. In Academic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed.), 115–130. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2004 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Casey
2015 Investigating textual borrowing in academic discourse: A need for a corpus-based approach. In Corpus-Based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber [ Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66 ], Viviana Cortes & Eniko Csomay (eds), 177–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
2008 Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. In Proceedings of the ACL-08:HLT Demo Session [Companion Volume], 13–16. Columbus OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pecorari, Diane
2003 Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(4): 317–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, Diane & Petrić, Bojana
2014 Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching 47(3): 269–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrić, Bojana
2012 Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(2): 102–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plakans, Lia
2008 Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing 13: 111–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Funes, Marcela
1999 The process of reading-to-write used by a skilled Spanish-as-a-foreign-language student: A case study. Foreign Language Annals 32: 45–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Philip & Diane Pecorari
2013 Source use in academic writing: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(2): A1–A3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Ling
2004 Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication 21(2): 171–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, Paul
2010 Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. English for Academic Purposes 9: 295–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2014 Variation in citation practice in corpus of student biology papers. From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication 31(1): 118–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Celia, Morton, Janne, & Storch, Neomy
2013 Where from, who, why and how? A study of the use of sources by first year L2 university students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(2): 99–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul
2001 A Pedagogically-Motivated Corpus-Based Examination of PhD Theses: Macrostructure, Citation Practices and Uses of Modal Verbs. PhD dissertation, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
Verheijen, Lieke
2015 The language of quoting in academic writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1): 101–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wette, Rosemary
2010 Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing 19: 158–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemeyer, Leonie
2017 Intertextuality in L2 academic writing: The use of paraphrases by German learners of English. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 45–68. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar