Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 227–254

The use of lexical patterns in engineering

A corpus-based investigation of five sub-disciplines

| Colorado State University
| Colorado State University

Over the past decade, engineering has been one of the most oft-chosen fields of study for domestic and international students at US colleges and universities (IIE 2017; NCES 2018). As a result, the number of students in undergraduate engineering courses has steadily grown, leading to increased attention devoted to the written discourse encountered in engineering courses. The present study investigates the linguistic overlap between published textbooks used in lower-division undergraduate engineering courses by focusing on the analysis of multi-word sequences – 5-word phrase-frames – commonly found in five engineering disciplines. Overall, it was found that, while frequency distribution and structural characteristics of the identified phrase-frames were consistent across the five corpora, there were dissimilarities in the discourse functions performed by these patterns.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Multiword sequences in discipline-specific texts
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Construction of engineering corpora
    • 2.2Identification of target phrase-frames
    • 2.3Structural and functional analysis of phrase-frames
    • 2.4Overlapping of phrase-frames
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Distribution and variability of phrase-frames
    • 3.2Structural categories for phrase-frames
    • 3.3Functional categories for phrase-frames
    • 3.4Findings for overlapping PFs
  • 4.Pedagogical applications of findings
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.10nek
References
Archer, Arlene
2008 ‘The place is suffering’: Enabling dialogue between students’ discourses and academic literacy conventions in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 27(3): 255–266. < DOI logo>Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. < DOI logo>Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica
2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 263–286. < DOI logo>Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004 If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. < DOI logo>Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Byrd, Pat & Coxhead, Averil
2010 On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 5: 31–64.Google Scholar
Chen, Lin
2010 An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 107–125. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Kelly J.
2017 A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25: 71–83. < DOI logo>Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H.
2012 KfNgram (a free software program). [URL]> (8 January 2019).
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel
2014 Lexical bundles and phrase frames in the language of hotel websites. English Text Construction 7(1): 84–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel & Pennock-Speck, Barry
2015 Target frames in British hotel websites. International Journal of English Studies 15(1): 51–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena & Xu, Xiaoyu
2019 Engineering registers in the 21st Century: SFL perspectives on online publications. Language, Context and Text 1(1): 65–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Alexander & Millar, Neil
2018 The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes 51: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz
2015 Phrase frames in English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven study of intra-disciplinary register variation. Research in Language 13(3): 266–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas
2013 Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Wenhua
2014 Measuring the vocabulary load of engineering textbooks for EFL undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes 33: 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute of International Education (IIE)
2017 International students by field of study, 2015/2016. Open Doors Report on International Education Exchange. [URL]> (19 July 2019).
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2015 Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes 37: 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin
2012 The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes 31(1): 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei, Yoon, Jungwan & Kisselev, Olesya
2018 A phrase-frame list for social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 76–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
2018 Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by field of study: Selected years, 1970–71 through 2015–16. [URL]> (15 March 2019).
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana
2019 Discipline-specific use of language patterns in engineering: A comparison of published pedagogical materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 41: Article 100774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orna-Montesinos, Concepcion
2008 A contribution to the lexis of construction engineering textbooks: The case of building and construction. Ibérica 16: 59–80.Google Scholar
Rezoug, Fares & Vincent, Benet
2018 Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1): 47–77.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marin S., Stoller, Fredricka L. & Jones, James K.
2008 Using the ACS journals search to validate assumptions about writing in chemistry and improve chemistry writing instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 85(5): 650–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth
2015 Quantification in conference talks and proceedings articles in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 38: 11–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Ellis, Nick C.
2010 An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Haidee E.
2016 Presenting lexical bundles for explicit noticing with schematic linguistic representation. TESL-EJ 20(2): 1–13. [URL]
Todd, Richard W.
2017 An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on? English for Specific Purposes 45: 31–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Ying
2019 A functional analysis of text-oriented formulaic expressions in written academic discourse: Multiword sequences vs. single words. English for Specific Purposes 54: 50–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Jeremy
2007 Collocation and technicality in EAP engineering. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(1): 18–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes 28: 170–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Joanna
2009 How technical communication textbooks fail engineering students. Technical Communication Quarterly 18(4): 351–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David C. & Appel, Randy
2014 Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoder, Brian L.
2017 Engineering by the numbers: 2017 ASEE profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. American Society for Engineering Education. [URL]> (10 December 2018).
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cui, Xuanjun & Yoonjung Kim
2023. Structural and functional differences between bundles of different lengths: A corpus-driven study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Wang, Yu, Tianshuang Ge & Zhilei Ren
2022. Noun Phrasal Complexity in Computer Science Conference Abstracts. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.