Hui-Hsien Feng | National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
This exploratory study investigates modal verbs
as stance features in the Physical Sciences sub-corpus of the
Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). The study
adopts Biber’s (2006)
stance framework, including modal verbs in three categories:
possibility, necessity, and prediction. Focusing on one feature
within one sub-corpus afforded closer consideration of the units of
analysis (discipline, level of study, nativeness, and register) that
could contribute to variation in the use of modals as stance
features. The findings show that possibility and prediction modals
are the most common in the Physical Sciences sub-corpus. The study
provides a description of student academic writing and considers
future research directions and pedagogical implications of stance in
Physical Science disciplines, student levels, nativeness, and
registers.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Studies about stance
2.1Stance in student writing
2.2Modal verbs as stance markers in academic writing
2002Interpersonal
metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and
identity. Discourse
Studies 4(2): 139–145.
Alsop, Sian & Nesi, Hilary
2009Issues
in the development of the British Academic Written English
(BAWE)
corpus. Corpora 4(1): 71–83.
Aull, Laura L., Bandarage, Dineth & Miller, Meredith
2017Generality
in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of
first-year, upper-level, and published academic
writing. Journal of English
for Academic
Purposes 26: 29–41.
Aull, Laura L. & Lancaster, Zak
2014Linguistic
markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing a
corpus-based
comparison. Written
Communication 31(2): 151–183.
Barton, Ellen
1993Evidentials,
argumentation, and epistemological
stance. College
English 55(7): 745–769.
Berkenkotter, Carol & Huckin, Thomas N.
1995Genre
Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication:
Cognition/Culture/Power. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, Robert
1994Learners’
transfer of writing skills between
languages. TESL Canada
Journal, 12(1): 29–46.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation
across Speech and
Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas
1993Using
register-diversified corpora for general language
studies. Computational
Linguistics 19(2): 219–241.
Biber, Douglas
2012Register
as a predictor of linguistic
variation. Corpus Linguistics
and Linguistic
Theory 8(1): 9–37.
Biber, Doug & Conrad, Susan
2009Register,
genre, and
style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. London: Longman.
1977Aspects
of Language, 2nd
edn. New York NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bruce, Ian
2009Results
sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A
genre analysis. English for
Specific
Purposes 28(2): 105–124.
Canseco, Grace & Byrd, Patricia
1989Writing
required in graduate courses in business
administration. TESOL
Quarterly 23(2): 305–316.
Chang, Peichin
2012Using
a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial
stance-taking: A textlinguistic
approach. ReCALL 24(2): 209–236.
Charles, Maggie
2006Phraseological
patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A
corpus-based study of theses in two
disciplines. English for
Specific
Purposes 25(3): 310–331.
Conrad, Susan
2000Will
corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the
21st century?TESOL
Quarterly 34(3): 548–560.
Crosthwaite, Peter, Cheung, Lisa & Jiang, Feng K.
2017Writing
with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional
dentistry research
reports. English for Specific
Purposes 46: 107–123.
1996A
Study of Writing Tasks Assigned in Academic Degree
Programs [Educational Testing
Service Research Report
54]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hardy, Jack A. & Römer, Ute
2013Revealing
disciplinary variation in student writing: A
multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of
Upper-level Student Papers
(MICUSP). Corpora 8(2): 183–207.
Hinkel, Eli
2009The
effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2
academic writing. Journal of
Pragmatics, 41(4): 667–683..
Horowitz, Daniel M.
1986What
professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL
classroom. TESOL
Quarterly 20(3): 445–462.
Hoye, Leo
1997Adverbs
and Modality in
English. London: Longman.
1999Disciplinary
discourses: Writer stance in research
articles. In Writing:
Texts, Processes and
Practices, Christopher N. Candlin & Ken Hyland (eds), 99–121. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken
2002Activity
and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic
writing. In Academic
Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed.), 115–130. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken
2004Disciplinary
Discourses. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance
and engagement: A model of interaction in academic
discourse. Discourse
Studies 7(2): 173–192.
Johns, Ann
2009Tertiary
undergraduate EAP: Problems and
possibilities. In English
for Specific Purposes in Theory and
Practice, Diane Belcher (ed.), 41–59. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Johns, Tim
1994From
printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the
context of data-driven
learning. In Perspectives
on Pedagogical Grammar, Terence Odlin (ed.), 293–313. Cambridge: CUP.
Johns, Tim
1991Should
you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning
materials. English Language
Research
Journal 4: 1–16.
Lancaster, Zak
2011Interpersonal
stance in L1 and L2 students’ argumentative writing in
economics: Implications for faculty development in WAC/WID
programs. Across the
Disciplines 8(4). [URL]
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
2003A
Communicative Grammar of
English, 3rd
edn. New York NY: Routledge.
Leech, Geoffrey
2005Meaning
and the English Verb, 3rd
edn. New York NY: Routledge.
Mauranen, Anna
1997Hedging
and modality in language revisers’
hands. In Hedging
and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic
Phenomenon, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schroeder (eds), 115–133. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006Corpus-based
Language Studies: An Advanced Resource
Book. New York NY: Routledge.
Millan, Enrique L.
2008Epistemic
and approximative meaning revisited: The use of hedges
boosters and approximators when writing research in
different
disciplines. In English
as an Additional Language in Research Publication and
Communication, Sally Burgess & Pedro Martin-Martin (eds), 65–82. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Miller, Ryan T., Mitchell, Tomas D. & Pessoa, Silvia
2016Impact
of source texts and prompts on students’ genre
uptake. Journal of Second
Language
Writing 31: 11–24.
Myers, Greg
1990The
rhetoric of irony in academic
writing. Written
Communication 7(4): 419–455.
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena
2012Genres
across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher
Education. Cambridge: CUP.
O’Donnell, Matthew B. & Römer, Ute
2012From
student hard drive to web corpus (part 2): The annotation
and online distribution of the Michigan Corpus of
Upper-level Student Papers
(MICUSP). Corpora 7(1): 1–18.
2009English
in academia: Does nativeness
matter?Anglistik:
International Journal of English
Studies 20(2): 89–100.
Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew B.
2011From
student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design,
compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus
of Upper-level Student Papers
(MICUSP). Corpora 6(2): 159–177.
Salager-Meyer, Fancoise
1994Hedges
and textual communicative function in medical English
written discourse. English
for Specific
Purposes 13(2): 149–170.
Samson, Sue
2010Information
literacy learning outcomes and student
success. The Journal of
Academic
Librarianship 36(3): 202–210.
Soliday, Mary
2011Everyday
Genres: Writing Assignments across the
Disciplines. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Street, Brian
2009“Hidden”
features of academic paper
writing. Working Papers in
Educational
Linguistics 24(1): 1–15.
Swales, John M.
2014Variation
in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers
from parenthetical plonking to intertextual
storytelling. Written
Communication 31(1): 118–141.
Thompson, Geoff
2001Interaction
in academic writing: Learning to argue with the
reader. Applied
linguistics 22(1): 58–78.
Thompson, Paul & Tribble, Chris
2001Looking
at citations: Using corpora in English for academic
purposes. Language Learning
&
Technology 5(3): 91–105.
Thompson, Geoff & Ye, Yiyun
1991Evaluation
in the reporting verbs used in academic
papers. Applied
Linguistics 12(4): 365–382.
Wharton, Sue
2012Epistemological
and interpersonal stance in a data description task:
Findings from a discipline-specific learner
corpus. English for Specific
Purposes 31(4): 261–270.
Wilder, Laura
2012Rhetorical
Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies:
Teaching and Writing in the
Disciplines. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Wingate, Ursula
2012‘Argument!’
helping students understand what essay writing is
about. Journal of English for
Academic
Purposes 11(2): 145–154.
Wu, Siew Mei
2007The
use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated
undergraduate geography
essays. Journal of English
for Academic
Purposes 6(3): 254–271.
Yang, An, Zheng, Shu-yuan & Ge, Guang-chun
2015Epistemic
modality in English-medium medical research articles: A
systemic functional
perspective. English for
Specific
Purposes 38:1–10.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Hollmann, Willem B., Kazuko Fujimoto & Masahiro Kuroda
2024. Japanese EFL undergraduate students’ use of the epistemic modal verbs may, might, and could in academic writing. Language Learning in Higher Education 14:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.