Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 281–306

P-frames and rhetorical moves in applied linguistics conference abstracts

| The Pennsylvania State University
| The Pennsylvania State University

This chapter examines the use of formulaic phrase frames (p-frames) in the rhetorical construction of Applied Linguistics Conference Abstracts (CAs). We consider both the distribution of p-frames across rhetorical moves/steps and the strength of the association of p-frames with individual moves/steps in 625 accepted AAAL 2017 CAs, all freely available on the organization’s website. We manually tagged the corpus for rhetorical moves/steps and identified p-frames of 5 and 6 words (29 per million threshold) using kfNgram (Fletcher 2012). Results highlight that p-frames play a prominent role in the realization of CA writers’ rhetorical goals both in the prevalence of p-frame use (roughly 1.7 instances per text in our data) and in the close relationship that many p-frames exhibit with particular rhetorical functions.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Corpus
    • 2.2Procedures
      • 2.2.1Rhetorical move analysis
      • 2.2.2Identification of p-frames
      • 2.2.3Mapping p-frames to rhetorical moves
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1The distribution of p-frames across the rhetorical move-steps
    • 3.2The association of p-frames with individual rhetorical moves/steps
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.12yoo
References
Anthony, Laurence
2019 AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL]> (20 February 2019).
Biber, Douglas
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2011 Using hands-on concordancing to teach rhetorical functions: Evaluation and implications for EAP writing classes. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, Ana Frankenberg-Garcia, Lynne Flowerdew & Guy Aston (eds), 26–43. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2013 The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotos, Elena, Huffman, Sarah & Link, Stephanie
2017 A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes 46: 90–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Kelly J.
2017 A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25: 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan
2012 Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11: 283–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip & Mathews-Aydınlı, Julie
2011 A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 30: 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, William H.
2011 Phrases in English Home. [URL]> (27 June 2011).
2012 KfNgram. Annapolis MD: USNA.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne
2005 An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific purposes 24: 321–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Corpora and Language Education. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
2014 A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages: Stems in English and French. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas
2013 Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halleck, Gene B. & Connor, Ulla M.
2006 Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 70–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2004 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Tim
1991 Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. ELR Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
Le, Thi Ngoc Phuong & Harrington, Michael
2015 Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes 39: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei, Yoon, Jungwan & Kisselev, Olesya
2018 A phrase-frame list for social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 76–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Ana I. & Swales, John M.
2018 Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes 50: 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Matthew B., Römer, Ute & Ellis, Nick C.
2013 The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omidian, Taha, Shahriari, Hesamoddin & Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna
2018 A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samar, Reza G., Talebzadeh, Hossein, Kiany, Gholam R. & Akbari, Ramin
2014 Moves and steps to sell a paper: A cross-cultural genre analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. Text & Talk 34(6): 759–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Maeda, Andrea
2016 A corpus-based study of the AAAL conference handbook. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23: 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Wayne P.
1997 A Genre Analysis of the TESOL Conference Abstract. PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004 Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Christine M.
2009 Building Genre Knowledge. West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond
2003 Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22: 365–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Diaz, Brett A.
2021. Corpus Linguistic Methodology as an Advanced Conversion Design for Social Science Research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 13:3 ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Omidian, Taha, Oliver James Ballance & Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
2023. Replicating corpus-based research in English for academic purposes: Proposed replication of Cortes (2013) and Biber and Gray (2010). Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Yoon, Jungwan & J. Elliott Casal
2020. Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step‐driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 462 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.