Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 281–306

P-frames and rhetorical moves in applied linguistics conference abstracts

| The Pennsylvania State University
| The Pennsylvania State University
This chapter examines the use of formulaic phrase frames (p-frames) in the rhetorical construction of Applied Linguistics Conference Abstracts (CAs). We consider both the distribution of p-frames across rhetorical moves/steps and the strength of the association of p-frames with individual moves/steps in 625 accepted AAAL 2017 CAs, all freely available on the organization’s website. We manually tagged the corpus for rhetorical moves/steps and identified p-frames of 5 and 6 words (29 per million threshold) using kfNgram (Fletcher 2012). Results highlight that p-frames play a prominent role in the realization of CA writers’ rhetorical goals both in the prevalence of p-frame use (roughly 1.7 instances per text in our data) and in the close relationship that many p-frames exhibit with particular rhetorical functions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Corpus
    • 2.2Procedures
      • 2.2.1Rhetorical move analysis
      • 2.2.2Identification of p-frames
      • 2.2.3Mapping p-frames to rhetorical moves
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1The distribution of p-frames across the rhetorical move-steps
    • 3.2The association of p-frames with individual rhetorical moves/steps
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.12yoo
References (30)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]> (20 February 2019).
Biber, Douglas. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2011. Using hands-on concordancing to teach rhetorical functions: Evaluation and implications for EAP writing classes. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, Ana Frankenberg-Garcia, Lynne Flowerdew & Guy Aston (eds), 26–43. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2013. The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotos, Elena, Huffman, Sarah & Link, Stephanie. 2017. A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes 46: 90–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Kelly J. 2017. A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25: 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan. 2012. Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11: 283–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip & Mathews-Aydınlı, Julie. 2011. A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 30: 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, William H. 2011. Phrases in English Home. <[URL]> (27 June 2011).
2012. KfNgram. Annapolis MD: USNA.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2005. An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific purposes 24: 321–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Corpora and Language Education. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 2014. A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages: Stems in English and French. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2013. Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halleck, Gene B. & Connor, Ulla M. 2006. Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 70–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Tim. 1991. Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. ELR Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
Le, Thi Ngoc Phuong & Harrington, Michael. 2015. Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes 39: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei, Yoon, Jungwan & Kisselev, Olesya. 2018. A phrase-frame list for social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 76–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Ana I. & Swales, John M. 2018. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes 50: 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Matthew B., Römer, Ute & Ellis, Nick C. 2013. The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omidian, Taha, Shahriari, Hesamoddin & Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna. 2018. A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samar, Reza G., Talebzadeh, Hossein, Kiany, Gholam R. & Akbari, Ramin. 2014. Moves and steps to sell a paper: A cross-cultural genre analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. Text & Talk 34(6): 759–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Maeda, Andrea. 2016. A corpus-based study of the AAAL conference handbook. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23: 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Wayne P. 1997. A Genre Analysis of the TESOL Conference Abstract. PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. 2009. Building Genre Knowledge. West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond. 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22: 365–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Wang, Yuanheng (Arthur) & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Conceptualizing Corpus-Based Genre Pedagogy as Usage-Inspired Second Language Instruction. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities 1:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Omidian, Taha, Oliver James Ballance & Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
2023. Replicating corpus-based research in English for academic purposes: Proposed replication of Cortes (2013) and Biber and Gray (2010). Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Diaz, Brett A.
2021. Corpus Linguistic Methodology as an Advanced Conversion Design for Social Science Research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 13:3 ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Yoon, Jungwan & J. Elliott Casal
2020. Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step‐driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 462 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.