Part of
Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the evolution of English
Edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96] 2020
► pp. 169198

Corpora and software

ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers 3.2
1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California. Modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities: Northern Arizona, Southern California, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Uppsala, Michigan, Manchester, Lancaster, Bamberg, Zurich, Trier, Salford, and Santiago de Compostela. [URL]
ECF = Eighteenth Century Fiction. Chadwyck Healey
1996–2018 <[URL]
EEBOCorp 1.0 = Early English Books Online Corpus 1.0
, compiled by Peter Petré 2013 <[URL]
HC = The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts
1991 Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English).Google Scholar
MED = Middle English Dictionary. Sherman M. Kuhn, John Reidy & Robert E. Lewis
(eds) 1952–2001Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. [URL]
NCF = Nineteenth Century Fiction. Chadwyck Healey
2000–2018 <[URL]
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online
Oxford: OUP. [URL]
WordSmith 6.0. Scott, Mike
2012WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. [URL]

Other references

Adamson, Sylvia
2000A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2018 That’s well bad: Some new intensifiers in spoken British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British English, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 60–95. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2007On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29(4): 554–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacchiani, Silvia
2017Cognitive motivation in English complex intensifying adjectives. Lexis 10: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Kytö, Merja
2014 I had lost sight of them for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243], Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds), 29–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
Fuchs, Robert
Heine, Bernd
2003Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3): 303–318.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José
2010Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 127–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter
2002 Really worthwile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, Bill
2000Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement, Chris Heffer & Helen Saunston (eds), 48–94. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2006Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18(3): 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2006Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27(1–2): 141–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Pahta, Päivi
2010Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2008Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on –ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti
2002 Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24(3–4): 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma
2012 He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she’s a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text and Talk 32(6): 773–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2008Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree . English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
1993Corpus evidence of language change: The case of the intensifier. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Evaluative prosody. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 279–303. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Hans
1994Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smith, K. Aaron & Nordquist, Dawn
2012A critical and historical investigation into semantic prosody. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 291–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2008 So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English. An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 37–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007(Inter)subjectification and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 295–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds): 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar