Part of
Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the evolution of English
Edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96] 2020
► pp. 251276

Corpora and text collections

ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. Version 3.2
1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013/2016Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. [URL]
BYU-BNC = Davies, Mark
2004–BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). [URL]
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760
2006Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). [URL]
CEN = The Corpus of English Novels. De Smit, Hendrik
comp.). [URL]
CLMET3.0 = The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. De Smet, Hendrik, Diller, Hans-Jürgen & Tyrkkö, Jukka
comps). [URL]
COCA = Davies, Mark
2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–2015. [URL]
COHA = Davies, Mark
2010–The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]
Early English Prose Fiction
1997–2015 Ed. by Holger Klein et al. Chadwyck-Healey. ProQuest LLC. [URL]
ECCO-TCP = Eighteenth Century Collections Online
EEBO = Davies, Mark
2017Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. [URL]
Eighteenth-century Fiction (1700–1780)
1996–2015Chadwyck-Healey (ProQuest Company). [URL]
Evans-TCP = Evans Early American Imprints
G&M = Globe and Mail
1844–presentProQuest Historical Newspapers. [URL]
Google Books
Hansard = Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015–British Parliament – Hansard 1803–2005. Part of the SAMUELS project. [URL]
The Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts
1998Compiled by Josef Schmied, Claudia Claridge & Rainer Siemund (University of Chemnitz). [URL]
OB = The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913. Hitchcock, Tim, Shoemaker, Robert, Emsley, Clive, Howard, Sharon & McLaughlin, Jamie et al.
(eds) <[URL] version 7.0, March 2012.
TIME = Davies, Mark
2007–TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. [URL]

Other references

Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2007Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, Ted
2000Interview of Gerald Gazdar. On Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar 3 November 2000, Cambridge, UK [URL]> (1 May 2018).
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2000Data in pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2): 175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward & Biber, Douglas
1995 That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. The Verb in Contemporary English, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 241–257. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Google Books Ngram Viewer
. [URL]. See Michel et al. 2011.
Goldberg, Adele E. & van der Auwera, Johan
2012This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica Historica 46(1): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2011Explaining diverging evidence: The case of clause-initial I think . In Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research [Human Cognitive Processing 33], Doris Schönefeld (ed.), 81–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2007Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto-Alanko, Päivi & Rissanen, Matti
2002 We give you to wit: Semantics and grammaticalisation of the verb wit in the history of English. In Variation Past and Present: VARIENG Studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Matti Rissanen (eds), 13–32. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2012This is not to say that I don’t think that it isn’t illogical. Language Log 3 November 2012, <[URL]> (10 September 2018).
López-Couso, María José
2007Auxiliary and negative cliticisation in Late Modern English. In ‘Of varying language and opposing creeds’: New Insights into Late Modern English, Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez & Jorge L. Bueno Alonso (eds), 301–323. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
Macmillan Dictionary
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
MED = Middle English Dictionary
1952–2001Hans Kurath et al. (eds). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Presser Aiden, Aviva, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A., & Lieberman Aiden, Erez
2011Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182. DOI logo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Colette
2006The use of videlicet in Early Modern English slander depositions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7(2): 245–263. DOI logo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online
2000–Michael Proffitt (ed.). 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP. [URL]> (30 May 2019).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1991On the history of that/zero of object clause links in English. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 272–289. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schilperood, Joost & Verhagen, Arie
1998Conceptual dependency and the clausal structure of discourse. In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, Jean-Pierre König (ed.), 141–163. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002“Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James A.
2009On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that . Linguistics 47(1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2001Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psychological Aspects, [Human Cognitive Processing 8], Ted J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperood & Wilbert Spooren (eds), 337–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Ian
2001/1957The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar