References
Archer, D. & Bousfield, D.
2010‘See better, Lear’? See Lear better! A corpus-based pragma-stylistic investigation of Shakespeare’s King Lear . In Language and Style, D. McIntyre & B. Busse (eds), 183–203. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archer D. & Lansley, C.
2015Public appeals, news interviews and crocodile tears: An argument for multi-channel analysis. Corpora 10(2): 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archer, D., Culpeper, J. & Rayson, P.
2009Love – “a familiar or a devil”? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies. In What’s in a Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, D. Archer (ed.), 137–158. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar
Baron, A. & Rayson, P.
2008VARD2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. Presented at the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Aston University, 22 May 2008.
Bowers, F. T.
[1959]2015Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587–1642. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Busse, B.
2006Vocative Constructions in the Language of Shakespeare [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 150]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busse, U.
2002Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 106]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charney, M.
2012Shakespeare’s Villains. Madison NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J.
2002Computers, language and characterisation: An analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. In Conversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium [Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee 15], U. Melander-Marttala, C. Ostman & M. Kytö (eds), 11–30. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet.Google Scholar
2009Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(1): 29–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. General introduction. Encyclopedia of Shakespeare’s Language [Arden Shakespeare]. London: Bloomsbury.
Garside, R. & Smith, N.
1997A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, R. Garside, G. Leech & A. McEnery (eds), 102–121. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McDonald, R.
(ed.) 2000Titus Andronicus. New York: Pelican Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
2nd rev. ed. (nd). Oxford: OUP.
Pollard, T.
2017Greek Tragic Women on Shakespearean Stages. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quennell, P. & Johnson, H.
2013Who’s Who in Shakespeare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ray, R.
2007William Shakespeare’s King Lear [Atlantic Critical Studies]. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.Google Scholar
Rayson, P., Archer, D., Baron, A., Culpeper, J. & Smith, N.
2007Tagging the bard: Evaluating the accuracy of a modern POS tagger on Early Modern English corpora. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: CL2007, M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston & P. Danielsson (eds). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Tassi, M. A.
2011Women and Revenge in Shakespeare: Gender, Genre and Ethics. Selinsgrove PA: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
White, J. S.
1997“Is black so base a hue?” Shakespeare’s Aaron and the politics and poetics of race. College Language Association Journal 40: 336–366.Google Scholar