Chapter published in:
Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts: In honor of Merja Kytö
Edited by Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97] 2020
► pp. 113130
Barnard, J. & Bell, M.
2002Appendix 1. Statistical tables. In The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. 4, J. Barnard & D. F. McKenzie (eds), 779–801. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. & Ensslin, A.
2011‘I know what it was. You know what it was’: Second-person narration in hypertext fiction. Narrative 19(3): 311–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boggel, S.
2009Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious Texts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brownlees, N.
2017Contemporary observations on the attention value and selling power of English print advertisements (1700–1760). In Diachronic Developments in English News Discourse [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 6], M. Palander-Collin, M. Ratia & I. Taavitsainen (eds), 61–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burnkrant, R. E. & Unnava, H. R.
1995Effects of self-referencing on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1): 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buyle, A. & De Smet, H.
2018Meaning in a changing paradigm: The semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou . Language Sciences 68: 42–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, C.
1992Pronouns of address and social negotiation in As you like it . Language and Literature 1(1): 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, K.
2013Interaction in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text & Talk 33(2): 167–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
1985Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In Literacy, Language, and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, D. R. Olson, N. Torrance & A. Hildyard (eds), 105–123. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chang, C.
2011Enhancing self-referencing to health messages. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 45(1): 147–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.
1992The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Debevec, K. & Iyer, E.
1988Self-referencing as a mediator of the effectiveness of sex-role portrayals in advertising. Psychology and Marketing 5(1): 71–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Debevec, K. & Romeo, J. B.
1992Self-referent processing in perceptions of verbal and visual commercial information. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1(1): 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A. & Bull, P.
2008‘Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence’: The strategic use of pronouns in political interviews. Journal of Language and Politics 7(2): 271–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T.
1963You und thou. Studien zur Anrede im Englischen (mit einem Exkurs über die Anrede im Deutschen). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
1997Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gieszinger, S.
2001The History of Advertising Language: The Advertisements in The Times from 1788 to 1996. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Görlach, M.
2002A linguistic history of advertising, 1700–1890. In Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000, Vol. 2: Sounds, Words, Texts and Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], T. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya & E. Seoane (eds), 83–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Herman, D.
2002Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, R.
1967Printing, Selling and Reading 1450–1550. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H.
2000 Thou in the history of English: A case for historical semantics or pragmatics? In Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, C. Dalton-Puffer & N. Ritt (eds), 153–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, M.
1991Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/WILL. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lass, R.
1999Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3, R. Lass (ed.), 56–186. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N.
1966English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Macrae, A.
2015‘You’ and ‘I’ in charity fundraising appeals. In The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns [Studies in Language Companion Series 171], L. Gardelle & S. Sorlin (eds), 105–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mcquarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G.
1996Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research 22(4): 424–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F.
1960A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Myers, G.
2008‘You in the shocking pink shellsuit’: Pronouns and address. In The Language of Advertising: Major Themes in English Studies, Vol. 1, G. Cook (ed.), 357–369. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Needham, P.
1986The Printer & the Pardoner: An Unrecorded Indulgence Printed by William Caxton for the Hospital of St. Mary Rounceval, Charing Cross. Washington DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
OED Online
Retrieved from http://​www​.oed​.com/. Oxford: OUP.
Olson, J. R.
2016‘Newly amended and much enlarged’: Claims of novelty and enlargement on the title pages of reprints in the early modern English book trade. History of European Ideas 42(5): 618–628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. H.
(ed.) 1992Jeremy Barlowe and William Roye, Rede me and be nott wrothe. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ratia, M. & Suhr, C.
2017Verbal and visual communication in title pages of Early Modern English medical texts. In Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts, M. Peikola, A. Mäkilähde, H. Salmi, M.-L. Varila & J. Skaffari (eds), 67–93. Turnhout: Brepols. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M.
1999Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3, R. Lass (ed.), 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Saenger, M. B.
2005The birth of advertising. In Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, D. A. Brooks (ed.), 197219. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2006The Commodification of Textual Engagements in the English Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Shevlin, E. F.
1999‘To reconcile book and title, and make ‘em kin to one another’: The evolution of the title’s contractual functions. Book History 2: 42–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. M.
2000The Title-page: Its Early Development 1460–1510. London & New Castle DE: The British Library & Oak Knoll Press.Google Scholar
STC = Pollard, A. W. & Redgrave, G. R. 1976–1991A Short-title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, and Ireland, and of English Books Printed Abroad, 1475–1640 (2nd ed., rev. by K. F. Pantzer, W. A. Jackson & F. S. Ferguson, 3 Vols.). London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I.
1997Genre conventions: Personal affect in fiction and non-fiction. In English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, M. Rissanen, M. Kytö & K. Heikkonen (eds), 185–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing 1375–1550. In Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, J. M. Kirk (ed.), 191–207. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2006Audience guidance and learned medical writing in late medieval English. In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, M. Gotti & F. Salager-Meyer (eds), 431–455. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, J.
2016Looking for rhetorical thresholds: Pronoun frequencies in political speeches. In The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation, M. Nevala, U. Lutzky, G. Mazzon & C. Suhr (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/17​/tyrkko/ (14 May 2020).Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, J., Marttila, V. & Suhr, C.
2013The Culpeper Project: Digital editing of title-pages. In Principles and Practices for the Digital Editing of Diachronic Data, A. Meurman-Solin & J. Tyrkkö (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. Retrieved from http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/14​/tyrkko​_marttila​_suhr/ (14 May 2020).Google Scholar
Varila, M.-L.
2018Compiling practices in printed English paratexts 1500–1550. Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing History 21: 27–51.Google Scholar
Varila, M.-L. & Peikola, M.
2019Promotional conventions on English title-pages up to 1550: Modifiers of time, scope, and quality. In Norms and Conventions in the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 347], B. Bös & C. Claridge (eds), 73–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wales, K.
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-day English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Walker, T.
2003 You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107], I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds), 308–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues: Trials, Depositions, and Drama Comedy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 158]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werlich, E.
1976A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar