Cover not available
Part of
Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts: In honor of Merja Kytö
Edited by Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97] 2020
► pp. 227–246

Chapter 14
Return to the future

Exploring spoken language in the BNC and BNC2014

 | University of Oxford
This study explores the use of expressions of future in two spoken corpora: BNC XML, from 1994, and BNC2014. It is a first, explorative venture aiming to identify features that merit further study. For that, the initial focus is placed on examining two features shown to vary between different corpora: frequency and proportions of the different expressions and collocations with personal pronouns. The results lend support to previous suggestions about changes in how future reference is expressed in English. It also shows that the new BNC2014 offers exciting opportunities for studies of Present-day British English. In combination with the demographically sampled component of the original BNC it becomes a useful resource for exploring the development of very recent language change.
Keywords: expressions of future, spoken data, diachronic change, pronouns, BNC1994 and BNC2014
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background
  • 2.Method and conventions
  • 3.Quantitative findings
    • 3.1Future reference in the corpora
    • 3.2Opportunity for future reference
    • 3.3Proportions of expressions of future
  • 4.Collocations with personal pronouns
    • 4.1 Will
    • 4.2 ’ll
    • 4.3 Going to
    • 4.4 Gonna
    • 4.5 Shall
  • 5.Summary and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.14ber
References (34)
References
Aitchison, J. 1981. Language Change: Progress or Decay? London: FontanaGoogle Scholar
1991. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2013. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Fourth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. & Burnard, L. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Axelsson, M. W. 1998. Contractions in British Newspapers in the Late 20th Century, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 102. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. 2018. A brief history of singular ‘they’. Oxford University Press, 4 September 2018, <[URL]> (15 September 2019).
Bell, E. 2016. Using ‘will’, ‘shall’ and ‘must’ in commercial contracts. Blake Morgan, 24 March 2016, <[URL]> (8 January 2020).Google Scholar
Berglund, Y. 2005. Expressions of Future in Present-day English: A Corpus-based Approach, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 126. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman Grammar. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
British National Corpus (XML edition). Retrieved from CQPweb at Lancaster, <[URL]> (15 September 2019).
The British National Corpus 2014: User Manual and Reference Guide (Version 1.1). <[URL]> (15 September 2019).
Burnard, L. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). <[URL]> (15 September 2019).Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Crowdy, S. 1995. The BNC spoken corpus. In Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application, G. Leech, G. Myers & J. Thomas (eds), 224–234. Harlow: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1995. The Cambridge Enclyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danchev, A. & Kytö, M. 1994. The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, D. Kastovsky (ed.), 59–77. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Danchev, A., Pavlova, A., Nalchadjan, M. & Zlatareva, O. 1965. The construction going to + inf. in Modern English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 13: 375–386.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. D. & Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krug, M. G. 2000. Emerging English Modals : A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kytö, M., Culpeper, J., Walker, T. & Archer, D. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Department of English, Uppsala University, <[URL]> (15 September 2019).
Leech, G. & Smith, N. 2000. Manual to Accompany The British National Corpus (Version 2) with Improved Word-class Tagging. <[URL]> (15 September 2019).Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2004. Recent grammatical change in English: Data, description, theory. In Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds), 61–81. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Livingston, J. & Evans, R. 1955. Whatever will be, will be : Que será, será. In Que será, será. London: Melcher-Toff Music.Google Scholar
Lorenz, D. 2013. Contractions of English Semi-modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency. NIHN Studies. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. & McEnery, T. 2017. The spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C. 1997. The spread of the going-to-future in written English: A corpus-based investigation into language change in progress. In Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, R. Hickey & S. Puppel (eds), 1537–1543. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1965. A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1974. The English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S. 1999. The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change 11(3): 315–342.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spoken British National Corpus 2014. Retrieved from CQPweb at Lancaster: <[URL]> (15 September 2019).
Szmrecsanyi, B. 2003. Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter? Journal of English Linguistics 31(4): 295–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallis, J. 1653. Grammatica linguæ anglicanæ Cui præsigitur, De loquela sive sonorum formatione, tractatus grammatico-physicus. Oxoniæ: Excudebat Leon. Lichfield. Veneunt apud Tho. Robinson.Google Scholar