Chapter 19
Orality on the searchable web
A comparison of involved web registers and face-to-face conversation
As Culpeper and Kytö (2010) discuss, one challenge of historical linguistics is the extent to which written texts represent the linguistic characteristics of speech. Synchronic linguists face similar challenges, leading to the practice of using a web corpus to represent the spectrum of oral–literate registers. However, there has been little research that tests the validity of this practice. The present chapter begins by summarizing the patterns of register variation on the searchable web documented in Biber and Egbert (2018). While that study documents the importance of oral–literate linguistic dimensions, it does not investigate whether involved web registers represent the linguistic characteristics of spoken registers. We explore that research question here, comparing the multi-dimensional profiles of online registers and spoken conversation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: Describing the patterns of register variation on the searchable web
- 2.1The multi-dimensional analysis of web registers
- 3.Analyzing the extent to which ‘oral’ registers from the searchable web represent the characteristics of face-to-face conversation and online conversations
- 4.Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
References (16)
References
Baron, N. 2008. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. & Egbert, J. 2016. Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. & Egbert, J. 2018. Register Variation Online. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D., Egbert, J. & Davies, M. 2015. Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora 10(1): 11–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, D. Tannen (ed.), 35–54. Norwood NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Egbert, J., Biber, D. & Davies, M. 2015. Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(9): 1817–1831. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gatto, M. 2014. Web as Corpus: Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jonsson, E. 2015. Conversational Writing: A Multidimensional Study of Synchronous and Supersynchronous Computer-mediated Communication. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. <[URL]> (15 May 2020).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. 2007. New resources or just better old ones? The holy grail of representativeness. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 133-150. Amsterdam: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G. 2003. Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational Linguistics 29(3): 333–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, D. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58(1): 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Hober, Nicole
2024.
Metalinguistic awareness as a factor in contact-induced language change.
Linguistics Vanguard 10:s2
► pp. 159 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.