Part of
Corpus Approaches to Social Media
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 111130
Baumgartner, Jason
n.d. Reddit Comment Corpus. [URL] (27 March 2020).
Berber Sardinha, Tony
2014Comparing internet and pre-internet registers. In Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber-Sardinha & Marcia Veirano-Pinto (eds), 81–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities 26(5–6): 331–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse
2016Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle & Grieve, Jack
2017Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online, Zeerak Waseem, Wendy Hui Kyong, Dirk Hovy & Joel Tetreault (eds), 1–10. Vancouver BC: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE 14(9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas
2001Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies. Eastbourne: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Covington, Michael A. & McFall, Joe D.
2010Cutting the Gordian Knot: The Moving-Average Type-Token Ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 17(2): 94–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Jacob
2013What to do about bad language on the internet. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 359–369.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kučera, Henry
1964A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers (Brown). Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar
Hess, Carla W., Sefton, Karem M. & Landry, Richard G.
1986Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29: 129–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, Carla W., Haug, Holly T. & Landry, Richard G.
1989The reliability of type-token ratios for the oral language of school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 536–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo
2014Choice of national variety in the English-language Wikipedia. In Texts and Discourses of New Media, Jukka Tyrkkö & Sirpa Leppänen (eds), n.p. Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL] (8 June 2020).
Koizumi, Rie & In’nami, Yo
2012Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System 40(4): 554–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubát, Miroslav & Milička, Jiří
2013Vocabulary richness measure in genres. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20(4): 339–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Aliza
2017Tweeting made easier. Twitter Blog, 7 November 2017, [URL] (5 February 2020).
Titak, Ashley & Roberson, Audrey
2013Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora 8(2): 239–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitter, Jeffrey Scott
1985Random sampling with a reservoir. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 11(1): 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Clarke, Isobelle
2022. Register and social media. Register Studies 4:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Heaton, Dan, Elena Nichele, Jeremie Clos, Joel E. Fischer & Michal Ptaszynski
2023. “The algorithm will screw you”: Blame, social actors and the 2020 A Level results algorithm on Twitter. PLOS ONE 18:7  pp. e0288662 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2022. Do registers have different functions for text length?. Register Studies 4:2  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2023. Register variation across text lengths. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2  pp. 202 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.