Chapter published in:
Corpus Approaches to Social Media
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 131146
Bieswanger, Markus
2013Micro-linguistic structural features of computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 463–486. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Assunta, Folino, Antonietta, Parisi, Francesca & Trunfio, Roberto
2014A statistical method for minimum corpus size determination. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis (JADT 2014), Emilie Née (ed.), 135–146. http://​lexicometrica​.univ​-paris3​.fr​/jadt​/jadt2014​/01​-ACTES​/11​-JADT2014​.pdf (23 February 2020).
Clement, Jessica
2019Most famous social network sites 2019, by active users. Statista. March 2019 <https://​www​.statista​.com​/statistics​/272014​/global​-social​-networks​-ranked​-by​-number​-of​-users/ (27 March 2019).
Dorsey, Jack
2017Twitter post (untitled). Twitter. 26 September 2017. https://​twitter​.com​/jack​/status​/912784057863245824? (23 February 2020).
Gligorić, Kristina, Anderson, Ashton & West, Robert, 6 April 2018. How constraints affect content: The case of Twitter’s switch from 140 to 280 characters. https://​arxiv​.org​/pdf​/1804​.02318 (23 February 2020).
Hu, Yuheng, Talamadupula, Kartik & Kambhampati, Subbarao
2013Dude, srsly? The surprisingly formal nature of Twitter’s language. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 8–11 July 2013, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, Emre Kiciman (ed.), 244–253. Palo Alto CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, Caneel K.
2009The Blank Page: Effects of Constraint on Creativity. PhD dissertation, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Mayikama, Koji
2016magicfor: Magic functions to obtain results from for loops. 18 December 2016. CRAN. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/magicfor​/index​.html (23 February 2020).
Rambukanna, Nathan
2015From #racefail to #ferguson: The digital intimacies of race-activist hashtag publics. In The Fibreculture Journal, Pip Shea, Tanya Notley, Jean Burgess & Su Ballard (eds), 150–188. Sydney, Australia: Fibreculture Journal, Open Humanities Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schnoebelen, Tyler
2012Do you smile with your nose: Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2): Article 14. http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol18​/iss2​/2 (23 February 2020).
Tatman, Rachael & Paullada, Amandalynne
2017Social identity and punctuation variation in the #BlueLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter Twitter communities. http://​www​.rctatman​.com​/files​/Tatman​_2017​_SocialIdentityAndPunctuation​.pdf (23 February 2020).
Tidyverse Team
2019tidyverse: An opinionated collection of R packages designed for data science. GITHUB. https://​github​.com​/tidyverse (23 February 2020).
2019twint: Open-source Twitter intelligence. GITHUB, https://​github​.com​/twintproject​/twint (23 February 2020).
Wickham, Hadley
2019stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrapper for Common String Operations. 10 February 2019. CRAN. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=stringr (23 February 2020).
Zappavigna, Michele
2015Searchable talk: The linguistic function of hashtags. Social Semiotics 25(3): 274–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sluchinski, Kerry
2021.  Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC. Narrative Inquiry Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.