Chapter published in:Corpus Approaches to Social Media
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 131–146
Chapter 6Double trouble
Are 280-character tweets comparable to 140-character tweets?
Linguistic data from social media is often discussed in the light of constraints, be it due to character limits or the putatively short attention span of users. In November 2017, Twitter eased one such constraint, increasing the maximum length of tweets from 140 to 280 characters. The present longitudinal study shows that this change has had an effect on the linguistic surface structure of tweets, especially in regard to optional syntactical and metatextual features. I discuss the origin and nature of these changes and their relation to hard constraints of social media platforms in addition to highlighting the impact on methodological aspects of future longitudinal studies of Twitter data which may cover periods both before and after the switch.
- 3.1Lexical variation
- 3.2Variation in punctuation
- 3.3Metatextual variation
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- 4.1Theoretical implications
- 4.2Methodological implications
Published online: 04 November 2020
Caruso, Assunta, Folino, Antonietta, Parisi, Francesca & Trunfio, Roberto
2014 A statistical method for minimum corpus size determination. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis (JADT 2014), Emilie Née (ed.), 135–146. http://lexicometrica.univ-paris3.fr/jadt/jadt2014/01-ACTES/11-JADT2014.pdf (23 February 2020).
2019 Most famous social network sites 2019, by active users. Statista. March 2019 <https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (27 March 2019).
2017 Twitter post (untitled). Twitter. 26 September 2017. https://twitter.com/jack/status/912784057863245824? (23 February 2020).
Gligorić, Kristina, Anderson, Ashton & West, Robert
2018 arXiv.org, 6 April 2018. How constraints affect content: The case of Twitter’s switch from 140 to 280 characters. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02318 (23 February 2020).
Hu, Yuheng, Talamadupula, Kartik & Kambhampati, Subbarao
Joyce, Caneel K.
2016 magicfor: Magic functions to obtain results from for loops. 18 December 2016. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/magicfor/index.html (23 February 2020).
2012 Do you smile with your nose: Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2): Article 14. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol18/iss2/2 (23 February 2020).
Tatman, Rachael & Paullada, Amandalynne
2017 Social identity and punctuation variation in the #BlueLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter Twitter communities. http://www.rctatman.com/files/Tatman_2017_SocialIdentityAndPunctuation.pdf (23 February 2020).
2019 tidyverse: An opinionated collection of R packages designed for data science. GITHUB. https://github.com/tidyverse (23 February 2020).
2019 twint: Open-source Twitter intelligence. GITHUB, https://github.com/twintproject/twint (23 February 2020).
2019 stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrapper for Common String Operations. 10 February 2019. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/package=stringr (23 February 2020).
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.