Cover not available
Part of
Corpus Approaches to Social Media
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 1–12

Introduction
The expanding landscape of corpus-based studies of social media language

| University of Bayreuth
| University of Basel
Article outline
  • 1.Social media as a data source
  • 2.Structure and scope of this volume
  • 3.Outlook
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 4 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.int
References (61)
References
Allcott, Hunt & Gentzkow, Matthew. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.). 2006. Sociolinguistics and Computer-Mediated Communication. Special issue of the Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4).Google Scholar
Baulch, Emma, Matamoros-Fernández, Ariadna & Johns, Amelia. 2020a. Introduction: Ten years of WhatsApp: The role of chat apps in the formation and mobilization of online publics. First Monday 25(1): article 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. Ten years of WhatsApp: The role of chat apps in the formation and mobilization of online publics. Special issue of First Monday 25(1).Google Scholar
Beißwenger, Michael & Pappert, Steffen. 2019. Handeln mit Emojis – Grundriss einer Linguistik kleiner Bildzeichen in der WhatsApp-Kommunikation. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Silvia & Mair, Christian. 2019. Investigating Englishes with corpora: An introduction. Textus: English Studies in Italy 1(2019): 7–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bredl, Klaus, Hunniger, Julia & Jensen, Jakob Linaa (eds.). 2014. Methods for Analyzing Social Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, McEnery, Tony & Wattam, Stephen. 2015. Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2): 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caple, Helen. 2019. “Lucy says today she is a Labordoodle”: How the dogs-of-Instagram reveal voter preferences. Social Semiotics 29(4): 427–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coats, Steven. 2019. Lexicon geupdated: New German anglicisms in a social media corpus. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Luke. 2019. Corpus Linguistics for Online Communication. London: CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dance, William. 2019. Defining ‘fake news’. FakeBelieve – The Disinformation and Fake News Blog. 13 March 2019, <[URL]> (31 March 2020).
Deumert, Ana. 2014. The performance of a ludic self on social network(ing) sites. In The Language of Social Media – Identity and Community on the Internet, Philip Seargeant & Caroline Tagg (eds), 23–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facebook. 2019. First grants announced for independent research on social media’s impact on democracy using Facebook data. <[URL]> (4 April 2020).
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gold, Matthew K. (ed.). 2012. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gold, Matthew K. & Klein, Lauren F. (eds). 2016. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, Michael. 1997. The attention economy and the net. First Monday 2(4): article 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Montgomery, Chris, Nini, Andrea, Murakami, Akira & Guo, Diansheng. 2019. Mapping lexical dialect variation in British English using Twitter. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2(11): article 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to theoretical concepts. Journal of Politeness Research 6(2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Uh…. not to be nitpicky, but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 58–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire & McGlashan, Mark. 2016. “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics 91: 80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. (ed.). 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Christian. 2017. Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media. In Pragmatics of Social Media [Handbooks of Pragmatics 11], Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds), 1–28. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Lee. 2018. The Qualified Self – Social Media and the Accounting of Everyday Life. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karinthy, Frigyes. 2007 [1929]. Chain-links. In Everything is different. Translated from Hungarian by Adam Makkai. <[URL]> (31 March 2020).
Lave, Jean & Wenger, Étienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jamie Shinhee (ed.). 2020. World Englishes and Digital Media. Special issue of World Englishes 39(1).Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula & Lawson, Robert. 2019. Gender politics and discourses of #mansplaining, #manspreading, and #manterruption on Twitter. Social Media + Society 5(3): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2020. World Englishes in cyberspace. In Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, Daniel Schreier, Marianne Hundt & Edgar W. Schneider (eds), 360–383. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice. 2015. Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture 27(1): 137–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, Gretchen. 2019. Because Internet – Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York NY: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
McGlashan, Mark. 2019. Collective identity and discourse practice in the followership of the Football Lads Alliance on Twitter. Discourse & Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mostafa, Mohamed M. 2013. More than words: Social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Systems with Applications 40(10): 4241–4251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordenes, Francisco Villarroel, Ludwig, Stephan, de Ruyter, Ko, Grewal, Dhruv & Wetzels, Martin. 2017. Unveiling what is written in the stars: Analyzing explicit, implicit, and discourse patterns of sentiment in social media. Journal of Consumer Research 43(6): 875–894.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2014. Hoaxes, hacking and humour: Analysing impersonated identity on social network sites. In The Language of Social Media – Identity and Community on the Internet, Philip Seargeant & Caroline Tagg (eds), 46–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Panckhurst, Rachel & Frontini, Francesca. 2020. Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text messages. In Visualizing Digital Discourse [Language and Social Life 21], Crispin Thurlow & Christa Dürscheid (eds), 81–104. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Perez, Sarah. 2020. Report: WhatsApp has seen a 40% increase in usage due to COVID-19 pandemic. TechCrunch. 26 March 2020, <[URL]> (31 March 2020).
Rieger, Oya Y. 2010. Framing digital humanities: The role of new media in humanities scholarship. First Monday 15(10): n.p. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew & Rivers, Damian. 2020. Sport in the new media landscape: Community, participation and discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip & Tagg, Caroline. 2014. Introduction: The language of social media. In The Language of Social Media – Identity and Community on the Internet, Philip Seargeant & Caroline Tagg (eds), 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray & Unsworth, John (eds). 2016. A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Shulman, David. 2017. The Presentation of Self in Contemporary Social Life. Los Angeles CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria & Bella, Spiridoula. 2019. Twitter, politeness, self-presentation. In Analyzing Digital Discourse – New Insights and Future Directions, Patricia Bou-Franch & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds), 341–366. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spilioti, Tereza & Tagg, Caroline, eds. 2017. Ethics of Online Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Special issue of Applied Linguistics Review 8(2–3).Google Scholar
Statista. 2020. Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2020, ranked by number of active users. <[URL]> (2 April 2020).
Svendsen, Bente Ailin. 2018. The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(2): 137–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite, Brooke, Julian, Tofiloski, Milan, Voll, Kimberly & Stede, Manfred. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 37(2): 267–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trye, David Gareth, Calude, Andreea Simona, Bravo-Marquez, Felipe & Keegan, Te Taka. 2019. Hybrid hashtags: #YouKnowYoureAKiwiWhen your tweet contains Māori and English. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2(11): article 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Twitter. 2014. Twitter #DataGrants selections. 17 April 2014, <[URL]> (4 April 2020).
. 2018. Twitter health metrics proposal submission. 1 March 2018, <[URL]> (5 April 2020).
Ueberwasser, Simone & Stark, Elisabeth. 2017. What’s up, Switzerland? A corpus-based research project in a multilingual country. Linguistik Online 84(5): n.p. <[URL]> (9 October 2018).
Vandekerckhove, Reinhild, Hilte, Lisa, Fišer, Darja & Daelemans, Walter. 2019. Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and Social Media Corpora. Special issue of European Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2).Google Scholar
Wardle, Claire. 2020. Interview with Tristan Harris and the Centre for Humane Technology. <[URL]> (4 April 2020).
What’s Up, Switzerland? n.d. <[URL]> (7 October 2018).
Wildfeuer, Janina, Pflaeging, Jana, Bateman, John, Seizov, Ognyan & Tseng, Chiao-I. (eds). 2019. Multimodality – Disciplinary Thoughts and the Challenge of Diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Matthew, Burnap, Pete & Sloan, Luke. 2017. Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology 51(6): 1149–1168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2018. Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Berber Sardinha, Tony
2022. A text typology of social media. Register Studies 4:2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.