Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation

| University of Alberta
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027201836 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027270535 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
One major feature of conversation is that people take turns to speak. Based on audio and video recordings of naturally-occurring Mandarin conversation, this book explores the role of syntax, prosody, body movements as well as their interplay in turn organization in the temporal unfolding of action and interaction. Adopting the methodology of interactional linguistics, this book offers a fine-grained analysis of the three multimodal resources and the sequential environments in which they appear. It demonstrates that syntax, prosody and body movements not only converge but also diverge in projecting possible turn completion. As one of the few systematic studies of multimodality in Mandarin interaction, this book will be of interest to researchers in Chinese linguistics, interactional linguistics, conversation analysis, and multimodal analysis.
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3]  2014.  xi, 265 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.3
Table of Contents
Transcription conventions
ix–x
Glossing conventions
xi–xii
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–22
Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology
23–32
Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization
33–70
Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization
71–138
Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization
139–194
Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization
195–240
Chapter 7. Conclusion
241–246
References
247–264
“One of the most important contributions of this monograph is that it studies, for the first time, Mandarin Chinese conversation in terms of the linguistic units related to TCUs and the linguistic cues to project turn ending. Another important contribution is that the monograph adds a new dimension, visual resource (i.e. body movement), and studies systematically the interplay of the three multimodality resources (i.e. syntax, prosody and body movement) with pragmatic resource in the construction and organization of turns. [...] This monograph is easy to read for those who are interested in Chinese but do not know Chinese. Li elaborates all the findings with many examples, each of which is followed by detailed interpretation.”
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

No author info given
2015. Publications Received. Language in Society 44:2 ► pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2016.  In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29], Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Conversational structures of Alto Perené (Arawak) of Peru [Studies in Language Companion Series, 181], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Language, Multimodal Interaction and Transaction [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 14], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Multimodal Performance and Interaction in Focus Groups [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 90], Crossref logo
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
2021. “Chunking” spoken language: Introducing weak cesuras. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 531 ff. Crossref logo
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody & Michael Haugh
2021. Teasing and claims to non-serious intent in Chinese talk shows. East Asian Pragmatics 6:2 Crossref logo
Gilbert, Kristin Enola
2017. Policing evaluation: Focus group interviews as an embodied speech event. Discourse & Communication 11:4 ► pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting
2016. Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting
2020. Click-Initiated Self-Repair in Changing the Sequential Trajectory of Actions-in-Progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:1 ► pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 549 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Yaqiong
2019. 普通话口语中非典型的“一个”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:2 ► pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
Nguyen, Li
2018. Borrowing or Code-switching? Traces of community norms in Vietnamese-English speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 443 ff. Crossref logo
Peng, Xin & Wei Zhang
2019. Talk and gesture in storytelling sequences in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:2 ► pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Ryan, Jonathon & Leslie Forrest
2021. ‘No chance to speak’: developing a pedagogical response to turn-taking problems. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 15:2 ► pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Song, Zixuan & Stefana Vukadinovich
2021. Collaborative construction of turn constructional units in responsive positions of question-answer sequences in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1 ► pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Thompson, Sandra A. & Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu
2016. Introduction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Vatanen, Anna, Tomoko Endo & Daisuke Yokomori
2021. Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Projection in Overlapping Agreements to Assertions: Stance-Taking as a Resource for Projection. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 308 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Wei
2016.  In Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 7], ► pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Atkinson, Maxwell & John Heritage
, eds. 1984 Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1991 Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 19. 139-157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “The Neverending Sentence: Rightward Expansion in Spoken Language”. Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric, ed. by Miklós Kontra & Tibor Váradi, 41-60. Budapest: Linguistics Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
1996 “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn-continuations”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996 57-100.
2000 “On line-Syntax-oder: was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen”. Sprache und Literatur85, 31:1. 43-56.Google Scholar
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar”. Text 25. 7–36.Google Scholar
2009a “On-line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language”. Language Sciences 31. 1-13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b “Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction”. Discourse Processes 46:2. 180-205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio
, eds. 1992 The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Frank Müller
1999 Language in Time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Gilbert
1969 [1818] Die Kunst der rednerischen und theatralischen Deklamation. Leipzig: Edition Leipzig.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting
, eds. 2010 Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1956 “The message ‘This is play’”. Group Processes: Transactions of the second conference, ed. by Bertram Schaffner, 145-242. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O.
1998 “Overlap in Mandarin conversation”. NACCL 9 (Proceedings of the Ninth North American Conference of Chinese Linguistics ), vol. II, 1-18. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, GSIL Publications.Google Scholar
2000 “Recent Developments in Discourse-and-Grammar”. Chinese Studies 18. 357-394.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bohle, Ulrike
2007 Das Wort ergreifen — das Wort übergeben. Explorative Studie zur Rolle redebegleitender Gesten in der Organisation des Sprecherwechsels. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1957 Interrogative Structures of American English. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
1989 Intonation and its Uses – Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, Karen L. Currie & Joanne Kenworthy
1980 Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Jianfen
1998 “Some Aspects on Chinese Intonation”. Proceedings of the Conference on Phonetics of the Language in China, Hong Kong, 1998 ed. by Eric Zee & Maocan Lin. 28-30. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
2002 “Hanyu Shengdiao yu Yudiao de Guanxi” [The Relationship between Tone and Intonation in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 2002:3. 195-202.Google Scholar
2004 “Hanyu Kouyu Yudiao Jiegou” [The Intonation Structure of Spoken Chinese]. Xiandai Yuyin Yanjiu yu Tansuo [ Modern Phonetics Study and Exploration ], ed. by Jianfen Cao, 355-388. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Cao, Wen
2007 “Zhao Yuanren Xiansheng dui Hanyu Yudiao Yanjiu de Gongxian” [Yuen-Ren Chao’s Contribution to the Research of Chinese Tone]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 82. 75-85.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1980 “The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of a Narrative”. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production ed. by Wallace Chafe, 9-50. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.Google Scholar
1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow”. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell Tomlin, 21-51. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “Prosodic and Functional Units of Language”. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 33-43. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chang, Hsiang Chang
2009 “Stance Uses of the Mandarin LE Constructions in Conversational Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 2240-2256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
1948 Mandarin Primer: An Intensive Course in Spoken Chinese. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2006[1932] “A Preliminary Study of English Intonation (with American Variants) and Its Chinese Equivalents”. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao, 110-197. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
2006[1933] Tone and Intonation in Chinese. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao, 198-220. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-ren
2007[1922] “Zhongguo Yanyu Zidiao di Shiyan Yanjiu Fangfa” [Experimental Study of Chinese Word Tones]. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao, 27-36. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Chu, Chauncey C.
1984 “Hanyu de Cixu jiqi Bianqian” [Chinese Word Order and Word Order Change]. Yuyan Yanjiu 1. 127-151.Google Scholar
2002 “Relevance Theory, Discourse Markers and the Mandarin Utterance-Final Particle a/ya”. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 37:1. 1-42.Google Scholar
Chui, Kawai
1996 “Organization of Repair in Chinese conversation”. Text 16:3. 343-372.Google Scholar
2004 “Overlapping Speech in Chinese Conversation”. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14:2. 139-156.Google Scholar
2005 “Temporal Patterning of Speech and Iconic Gestures in Conversational Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 871-887. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Linguistic and Imagistic Representations of Motion Events”. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1767-1777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonie, Rene Collier & Johan ’t Hart
1982 “Declination: Construct or Intrinsic Feature of Speech Pitch”? Phonetica 39. 254-273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonie & Johan ’t Hart
1965 Perceptual Analysis of Intonation Patterns. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Acoustics , 1-4. Liege.
Condon, William S. & William D. Ogston
1966 “Sound Film Analysis of Normal and Pathological Behaviour Patterns”. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 143:4. 338-347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967 “A Segmentation of Behavior”. Journal of Psychiatric Research 5. 221-235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen
1981 Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production. New York, NY.: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1992 “Contextualizing Discourse: The Prosody of Interactive Repair”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 337–364.Google Scholar
1993 English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “Intonation and Clause Combining in Discourse: The Case of Because”. Pragmatics 6:3. 389-426.Google Scholar
2001a “Interactional Prosody: High Onsets in Reasonfor-the-Call Turns” Language in Society 30. 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Intonation and Discourse: Current Views from within”. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton, 13-34. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004 “Prosody and Sequence Organization in English Conversation: The Case of New Beginnings”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 335-376.Google Scholar
2007 “Prosodische Prospektion und Retrospektion im Gespräch”. Gespräch als Prozess: Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, 69-94. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2012 “Some Truths and Unthruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions”. Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 123-145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Cecilia E. Ford
2004 Sound Patterns in Interaction— Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
, eds. 1996a Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996b “Towards an Interactional Perspective on Prosody and a Prosodic Perspective on Interaction”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996a 11-56.Google Scholar
2001 “Introducing Interactional Linguistics”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 1-24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2001 “Concessive Patterns in Conversation”. Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd-Dieter Kortmann, 381-410. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2008 “On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and Its Relatives”. Discourse Studies 10:4. 443-467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Allen
1986 Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1969 Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1975 The English Tone of Voice. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci & Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:2. 129-153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Long, Alton
1974 “Kinesic Signals at Utterance Boundaries in Preschool Children”. Semiotica 11:1. 43-73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2004 “Conversation Analysis”. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch & Robert E. Sanders, 71-102. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2009 “‘Quit Talking While I’m Interrupting’: A Comparison between Positions of Overlap Onset in Conversation”. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso & Jan Lindström, 70-93. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2010 “On the Micro-Politics of Social Action in Interaction”. Paper presented at 2010 International Conference of Conversation Analysis (ICCA), Mannheim, July 2010.
Drew, Paul & Elizabeth Holt
1998 “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation”. Language in Society 27. 495–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephen Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino
1993 “An Outline of Discourse Transcription”. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey Jr
1972 “Some Signals and Rules for Talking Speaking Turns in Conversation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23:2. 283-292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1974 “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns”. Language in Society 3:2.161-180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Starkey Jr. & Donald W. Fiske
1977 Face-To-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. New York, NY.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey Jr. & George Niederehe
1974 “On Signalling That it’s Your Turn to Speak”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10. 234-247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace Friesen
1969 “The Repertorie of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage and Coding”. Semiotica 1. 49-90.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick
1975 “One Function of Proxemic Shifts in Face-to-Face Interaction”. Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, ed. by Adam Kendon, Richard M. Harris, & Mary R. Key, 175-188. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz
1982 The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Mei
1994 “Beijinghua Juzhong Yuqici de Gongneng Yanjiu [A Functional Study of the of the particles used as a thematic marker in Mandarin]”. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 129-138.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen
1992 “The Interactive Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse”. Discouse Processes 15. 207-228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R.
1930 Speech. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory”. Studies in Linguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society). 1-32. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Flowe, William C.
2002 The Form and Function of Prosodic Stylization in Spoken Discourse. PhD Dissertation. Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E.
1993 Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Contingency and Units in Interaction”. Discourse Studies 6. 27–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
1996 “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited”. Pragmatics 6. 427–454.Google Scholar
. eds. 2002a The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002b Introduction. Ford, Fox & Thompson 2002a 3-13.
2003 “Social Interaction and Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Langauge Structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, Vol. 2, 119-144. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra. A. Thompson
1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Projection of Turn Completion”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996 134–184.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1986 “Local Patterns and General Principles in Cognitive Processes”. Text 16:1. 25-51.Google Scholar
1987 Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Directions in Research: Language and the Body. Research on Language and Social Interaction32:2. 51-59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “An Exploration of Prosody and Turn Projection in English Conversation”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 287–316.Google Scholar
2002 “On the Embodied Nature of Grammar: Embodied Being-in-the-World”. Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan, 79-99. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., Makoto Hayashi & Robert Jasperson
1996 “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996 185–237.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Robert Jasperson
1995 “A Syntactic Exploration of Repair in English Conversation”. Alternative Linguistics, ed. by Phillip W. Davis, 77-134. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010 “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43:2. 133–156.Google Scholar
French, Peter & John Local
1983 “Turn Competitive Incomings”. Journal of Pragmatics 7. 701–715. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 “Prosodic Features and the Management of Turn Interruptions”. Intonation in Discourse, ed. by Catherine Johns-Lewis, 157–180. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gao, Mingkai
1995 Yuyan lun [On Language]. Beijing: Shuangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald
1987 “Tails (Right-Dislocations) as a Repair Mechanism in English Conversation”. Getting One’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, ed. by Jan Nuyts, 119-129. Dordrecht: Feris.Google Scholar
1992 From Discouse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English: Evidence from Conversational Repair. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geng, Renling
1988 Titaiyu Gaishuo [A Introduction to Body Language]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin
1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York, NY.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis. New York, NY.: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation”. Everyday Language: Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97-121. New York, NY.: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning”. Sociological Inquiry 50:3-4. 272-302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation”. Semiotica 62:1-2. 29-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28:3. 233-260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000a “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1489-1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000b “Gesture, Aphasia and Interaction”. Language and Gesture: Window into Thought and Action, ed. by David McNeill, 84-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Time in Action”. Current Anthropology, 43 (Supplement August - October 2002. Special issue Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology). 19-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Pointing as Situated Practice”. Pointing: Where language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 217-41. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments”. Pragmatics 1(1). 1-54.Google Scholar
1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context”. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin, 147-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H.
1980 “Processes of Mutual Monitoring Implicated in the Production of Description Sequences”. Sociological Inquiry 50. 303-317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983 “Searching for a Word as an Interactive Activity”. Semiotics, ed. by John N. Deely & Margot D. Lenhart, 129-38. New York, NY.: Plenum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. & Charles Goodwin
1986 “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word”. Semiotica 62:1-2. 51-75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”. Universals of Language, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 110-113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Griffitt, Kira L.
2008 Functions of Leaning in Episodes of Laughter: Laughter as a Visual Phenomenon. MA Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Grosjean, Francois
1983 “How Long is the Sentence? Prediction and Prosody in the On-line Processing of Language”. Linguistics 21. 501–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982.Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992a Contextualization and Understanding. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti & CharlesGoodwin, 229-252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992b “Contextualization Revisited”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 39-45.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1994 “Ritualization and the Development of Language”. Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca, 3-28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli & Margret Selting
, eds. 2005a Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005b Introduction. Hakulinen & Selting 2005a 1-14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967 Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Mokoto
1999 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation”. Human Studies 22:2-4. 475-499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Postposition-Initiated Utterances in Japanese Conversation: An Interactional Account of a Grammatical Practice”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 317-343.Google Scholar
2003a. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36:2. 109-141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Discourse within a Sentence: An Exploration of Postpositions in Japanese as an Interactional Resource”. Language in Society 33:3. 343-376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Joint Turn Construction through Language and the Body: Notes on Embodiment in Coordinated Participation in Situated Activities”. Semiotica 156:1/4. 21–53.Google Scholar
2009 “Marking a ‘Noticing of Departure’ in Talk: Eh-Prefaced Turns in Japanese Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 41:10. 2100-2129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, Yang
1994 “Hanyu Wanju Chengfeng Shitan” [An Exploration of Sentence-Final Elements] Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 1994:4. 26-38.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian C.
1984 “Talk and Recipiency: Sequential Organization in Speech and Body Movement”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 247-265.Google Scholar
1986 Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2001a Syntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Emerging Syntax for Interaction Noun Phrases and Clauses as a Syntactic Resource for Interaction”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 25-50.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984a Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
1984b “A Change-of-State-Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Goffman, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology”. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader for Researchers, ed. by MargaretWetherall, Stephnie J. Taylor & Simon J. Yates, 47-56. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2004 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk”. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Robert Sanders & Kristine Fitch, 103-147. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hewes, Gordon H.
1957 “The Anthropology of Posture”. Scientific American 196. 122-132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth & Paul Drew
2005 “Figurative Pivots: The Use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38. 235-261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987 “Emergent Grammar”. Berkeley Linguistic Society 13. 139-157.Google Scholar
1998 “Emergent Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155-175. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hu, Fu & Wen, Lian
1984 “Hanyu Yuxu Yanjiu zhong de ji ge Wenti” [A Few Thoughts on the Word Order in Chinese]. Zhonguo Yuwen 3. 161-165.Google Scholar
Hu, Mingyang
1981 “Beijinghua de Yuci Zhuci he Tanci II” [Mood Particles and Interjections in Beijing Mandarin]. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 416-423.Google Scholar
1987 “Guanyu Beijinghua de Yudiao Wenti” [On the Intonation of Beijing Mandarin], Beijinghua Chutan [A Preliminary Study on Beijing Mandarin] ed. by Mingyang Hu, 146-164. Beijing: Shuangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD Dissertation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. & Robbin Wooffitt
1998 Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sally & Scott Jacobs
1980 “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66. 251-265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jasperson, Robert
2002 “Some Linguistic Aspects of Closure Cut-off”. Ford, Fox & Thompson 2002a 257–286.
Jefferson, Gail
1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation”. Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219-248. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance Declination”. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79-96. New York, NY.: Irvington.Google Scholar
1983a “Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation 1: Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset”. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28. 1-28.Google Scholar
1983b “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature”. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30. 1-25.Google Scholar
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 191-222.Google Scholar
1986 “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset”. Human Studies 9. 153-183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation”. Social Problems 35:4. 418-442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13-31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jiang, Wangqi
2003 Dangdai Yuyongxue [Pragmatics]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
2005 “Hanyu de ‘Juzi’ yu Yingyu de Sentence” [Chinese Juzi and English Sentence]. Jiefangjun Waiguoyuxueyuan Xuebao 1. 10-15.Google Scholar
Jin, Song
1992 “Beijinghua de Yuqi he Yudiao” [On the Mood and Intonation of Beijing Mandarin]. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 113-123.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John & John Local
1989 “On the Use of General Phonetic Techniques in Handling Conversational Material”. Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Derek Roger & Peter Bull, 197–212. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1972 “Some Relationships Between Body Motion and Speech”. Studies in Dyadic Communication, ed. by Wolfe A. Seigman & Benjamin Pope, 177-216. Elmsford, New York, NY.: Pergamon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973 “The Role of Visible Behaviour in the Organization of Social Interaction”. Social Communication and Movement: Studies of Interaction and Expression in Man and Chimpanzee, ed. by Mario Von Cranach & Jan Vine, 29-74. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1975 “Gesticulation, Speech and the Gesture Theory of Language Origins”. Sign Language Studies 9. 349-373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 Studies in the Behavior of Face-to-Face Interaction. Lisse, Netherlands: Peter De Ridder Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Gesture and Speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance”. Nonverbal Communication and Language, ed. by Mary R. Key, 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1985 “Some Uses of Gesture”. Perspectives on Silence, ed. by Deborah Tannen & Muriel Saville-Troike, 215-234. Norwood, N.J.:Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
1990 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995 “Gestures as Illocutionary and Discourse Structure Markers in Southern Italian Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 23:3. 247-279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Gesture”. Annual Review of Anthropology 26. 109-128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun
1999 “Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation”, Human Studies 22. 425-46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, Roger
1958 The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1990 The Temporal Relationship between Gesture and Speech: A Study of Japanese-English Bilinguals. MA thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1993 Language and Thought Interface: A Study of Spontaneous Gestures and Japanese Mimetics. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Klinghardt, Hermann & Gertrude Klemm
1920 Übungen im englischen Tonfall. Cöthen: O. Schulze.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1988 “Declination “Reset” and the Hierarchical Organization of Utterances”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84. 530-544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Christian. D. & Jürgen Streeck
2000 “Gestures, Knowledge, and the World”. Gestures in Action, Language, and Culture, ed. by McNeill David, 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentence-in-Progress”. Langauge in Society 20. 441-458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “On the ‘Semi-Permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996 238–276.Google Scholar
2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences”. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 225-256. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi
1999 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices”. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 49-75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, William J. M.
1989 Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Aijun
2002 “Putonghua Duihua zhong Yunlv Tezheng de Shengxue Biaoxian” [Prosodic Analysis on Conversations in Standard Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 525-535.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1974 “An Explanation of Word Order Change from SVO to SOV”. Foundations of Language 12. 201-214.Google Scholar
1975 “The Semantic Function of Word Order: A Case Study in Mandarin”. Word Order and Word Order Change, ed. by Charles N. Li, 163-195. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1976 “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language”. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 457-489. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., Sandra A. Thompson & Bojiang Zhang
1998 “Cong Huayu Jiaodu Lunzheng Yuqici ‘de’” [An Account of Particle de from a Discourse Perspective]. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 93-102.Google Scholar
Li, Jiequn
2002 Feiyanyu Jiaoji Gailun [ Nonverbal Communication ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Jinxi
2007[1924] Xinzhu Guoyu Wenfa [ New Grammar of Chinese ]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting
2013 "Language and the Body in the Construction of Units in Mandarin Face-to-Face Interaction". Units of Talk–Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond, 343-375. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 "Leaning and Recipient Intervening Questions in Mandarin Conversation". Journal of Pragmatics 67. 34-60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Phillip
1967 Intonation, Perception and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Dajin & Chaoqun Xie
2003 “Hudong Yuyanxue de Fazhan Licheng jiqi Qianjing” [The Development and Outlook of Interactional Linguistics] Xiandai Waiyu 4. 411-428.Google Scholar
Lin, Tao
1983 “Tantao Beijinghua Qinyin Xinzhi de Chubu Shiyan” [Preliminary experiments in the exploration of the nature of Mandarin neutraltone] Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics] 16-37. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing
2003 “Yuyan Leixingxue yu Hanyu Yanjiu” [Linguistic Typology and the Study of Chinese] Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 4. 5-12.Google Scholar
Liu, Hong
2004 Huihua Jiegou Fenxi. [ Analysis of Conversational Structure ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Yabin & Aijun Li
2002 “Langdu Yuliao yu Ziran Kouyu de Chayi Fenxi” [Comparative Analysis Between Read and Spontaneous Speech]. Zhongwen Xinxi Xuebao 1. 13-53.Google Scholar
Local, John
1986 “Patterns and Problems in a Study of Tyneside Intonation”. Intonation in Discourse, ed. by Johns-Lewis, Sinclair, 181–198. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1992 “Continuing and Restarting”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 273–296.
Local, John & John Kelly
1986 “Projection and ‘Silences’: Notes on Phonetic and Conversational Structure”. Human Studies 9. 185–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John, John Kelly & William H. G. Wells
1986 “Towards a Phonology of Conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English”. Journal of Pragmatics 22:2. 411-437.Google Scholar
Local, John & Gareth Walker
2004 “Abrupt-Joins as a Resource for the Production of Multi-TCU, Multi-Action Turns”. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1375–1403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Methodological Imperatives for Investigating the Phonetic Organization and Phonological Structures of Spontaneous Speech”, Phonetica 62. 120-130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John & Bill Wells & Mark Sebba
1985 “Phonology for Conversation: Phonetic Aspects of Turn-Delimitation in London Jamaican”. Journal of Pragmatics 9. 309–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John & Anthony Wootton
1995 “Interactional and Phonetic Aspects of Immediate Echolalia in Autism: A Case Study”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 9. 155–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Jianmin
1980 “Hanyu kouyu jufa li de yiwei xianxiang” [Transposition in the grammar of spoken Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 28-41.Google Scholar
1984 “Guanyu Xiandai Hanyu li de Yiwen Yuqici” [On Interrogative Particles in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 5. 330-337.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong
1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Juzi Chengfen de Houzhi yu Hualun Jiaoti zhong de Hualun Houxu Shouduan” [Postposed Sentential Constituents as Post-Completion Devices in Conversational Turn-Taking]. Zhongguo Yuwen 4. 303-310.Google Scholar
2002 “Zai Jinxing zhong de Juzi li Banshi Jumo” [Recognizing the End of a Sentence-in Progress]. Hanyu yufa yanjiu de xin tuozhan [New development in Chinese grammar (1): Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Modern Chinese Grammar for the New Millennium] ed. by Xu Liejiong & Shao Jingmin, 356-374. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Yanshenju de kua Yuyan Duibi” [A Cross-Linguistic Study of Incremental Sentences] Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 6. 1-9.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong
2005 “Shuo Yanshenju” [On Incremental Sentences]. Papers in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversity of Zhongguo Yuwen, 39-48. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang
1951 Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [An Outline of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
1979 Hanyu Yufa Fenxi Wenti [Issues in Analyzing Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
1980a Yuwen Changtan [Fundamentals of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.Google Scholar
1980b Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Major Words in Contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang & Dexi Zhu
1951 Yufa Xiuci Jianghua [Grammar of Speech]. Beijing: Kaiming Shudian.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen
1997 Jianming Shiyong Hanyu Yufa Jiaocheng [A Concise and Practical Texbook on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards, 146-152. New York, NY.: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas
1997 The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30:2. 93-130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
1985 So You Think Gestures are Nonverbal? Psychological Review 92:3. 350-371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
1998 Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte-Theorie-Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.Google Scholar
2004 “Forms and Uses of the Palm-Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture Family?” The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, ed. by Cornalia Müller & Roland Posner, 234–256. Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1979 “Transcription as Theory”. Developmental Pragmatics, ed. by Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin, 43-72. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emaneul A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson
, eds. 1996 Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Joseph & Gordon Arnold
1961 Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard
2001 “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Voice Quality as a Resource for the Management of Turn-taking in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction”. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 123–126.
2004 “Non-Modal Voice Quality and Turn-taking in Finnish”. Couper-Kuhlen, & Ford 2004 29–62.
2009 An Introduction to English Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1994 “Unattached NPs in English Conversation”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20. 402-419.Google Scholar
1995 “What Can Conversation Tell Us about Syntax?” Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, ed. by Phillip W. Davis, 213-271. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harold E.
1922 English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M.
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessment: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 57-101.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, Jack C., John Platt & Heidi Platt
1992 Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 413-429.Google Scholar
1992a Lectures on Conversation, vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1992b Lectures on Conversation, vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey & Emaneul A. Schegloff
2002 [1975]. “Home Position”. Gesture 2:2. 133–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation”. Language 50. 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheflen, Albert E.
1964 “The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems”. Psychiatry 27:4. 316-331.Google Scholar
1973 Communicational Structure: Analysis of a Psychotherapy Transaction. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings”. American Anthropologist 70. 1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979 “The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation”. Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 261–88. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’”. Special double issue “Language and Social Interaction”, Sociological Inquiry 50. 104–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things That Come between Sentences”. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71-93. Washingtong, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1984 “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk”. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Atkinson & Heritage 1984 266-296. Google Scholar
1987a “Analyzing Single Episodes of Conversation: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis”. Social Psychology Quarterly 50. 101–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987b “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turntaking Organisation”. Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Button Graham & John Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation”. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton, 89–135. London: Polity.Google Scholar
1992 “Introduction”. Sacks 1992b ix-lxii.
1996a “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action”. Journal of Sociology 102:1. 161-216.Google Scholar
1996b “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996 52–133.Google Scholar
1998a “Body Torque”. Social Research 65:3. 535-596.Google Scholar
1998b “Reflections on Studying Prosody in Talk-in-Interaction”. Language and Speech 41. 235–263.Google Scholar
1999 “Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis”. Discourse Studies 1:4. 405–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Word Repeats as Unit Ends”. Discourse Studies 13:3. 367-380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Peference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation”. Language 53:2. 361-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Harvey Sacks
1973 “Opening Up Closings”. Semiotica 8. 289-327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994 Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold
2005 “Zur multimodalen Struktur von Turn-Taking”. Geprächsforschung-Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 6. 17-61.Google Scholar
Schönherr, Beatrix
1997 Syntax-Prosodie-nonverbale Kommunikation. Empirische Untersuchungen zur Interaktion sprachlicher und parasprachlicher Ausdrucksmittel im Gespräch. Tübingen:Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwitalla, Johannes
1979 Dialogsteuerung in Interviews. Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Dialogsteuerung mit empirischen Untersuchungen von Politiker-, Experten- und Star-interviews in Rundfunk und Fernsehen. München: Hüber.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts”. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York, NY.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
1992a “Prosody in Conversational Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics 17. 315-345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992b “Intonation as a Contextualization Device: Case Studies on the Role of Prosody, Especially Intonation, in Contextualizing Story Telling in Conversation”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 233–258.Google Scholar
1995a Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995b “Der ‘mögliche Satz’ als interaktiv relevante syntaktische Kategorie”. Linguistische Berichte 158. 198-352.Google Scholar
1996 On the Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Constitution of Turn-Constructional Units and Turns in Conversation. Pragmatics 6. 357–388.Google Scholar
2000 The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk. Language in Society 29. 477-517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Fragments of Units as Deviant Cases of Unit-Production in Conversational Talk. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 229-258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Syntax and Prosody as Methods for the Construction and Identification of Turn-Constructional Units in Conversation. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting, 17-44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Prosody in Interaction: State of the Art”. Barth-Weingarten, Reber & Selting 2010 3-40.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, Susanne Uhmann1
2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) ”. Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10. 353-402.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
. eds. 2001 Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiong
1985 “Beijinghua Shengdiao de Yinyu he Yudiao” [The Range of Tones and Intonation in Beijing Mandarin]. Beijing Yuyin Shiyanlu [Experimental Analyses on Beijing Mandarin] ed. by Tao Lin and Lijia Wang, 73-125. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Hanyu Yudiao Moxing Chuyi” [On the Pattern of Chinese Intonation]. Yuwen Yanjiu 4. 16-24.Google Scholar
1994 “Hanyu Yudiao Gouzao he Yudiao Leixing” [Chinese Intonation Structure and Intonation Types]. Fangyan 4. 221-229.Google Scholar
Shen, Xiaonan Susan
1990 The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Youwei
1997 Hanyu Rushiguan [Aspects of Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi
2001 “Hanyu de Zhuyu yu Huati zhi bian” [The Distinction between Subject and Topic in Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu 2. 82-91.Google Scholar
Shih, Chilin
1997 “Declination in Mandarin Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications”. Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop, Athens, 18-20 September 1997 ed. by Antonis Botinis, Georgios Kouroupetroglou & George Carayiannis, 293-296. Athens: ESCA and the University of Athens Department of Informatics.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
1996 “On Repeats and Responses in Finnish Conversation”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996. 277-327.Google Scholar
2001a Responding in Conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Simple Answers to Polar Questions: The Case of Finnish”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 405-431.
Spekman, Marloes
2009 Co-verbal Behavior in Turn-Taking: An Explorative Study into the Role of Co-Verbal Behavior in Turn-Taking in Conversations between Dutch Children between the ages of nine and twelve. MA thesis, VU University Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: When Nodding is a Token of Preliminary Affiliation”. Research on Language in Social Interaction 41. 29-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell
2005 Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica 156:1/4. 1-20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
1984 “Embodied Contexts, Transcontextuals and the Timing of Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 8. 113-137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “Gesture as Communication I: Its Coordination with Gaze and Speech”. Communication Monographs 60. 275–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 “Gestures as Communication II: The Audience as Co-Author”. Research on Langauge and Social Interaction 27:3. 223-238.Google Scholar
1995 “On Projection”. Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 87-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Geste und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeu- tungswandel der 'bietenden Hand'”. Gespräch als Prozess, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, 157-180. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2008 Depicting by Gestures. Gesture 8:3. 285–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a Gesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Forward-Gesturing. Discourse Processes 46:2. 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin & Curtis D. LeBaron
2011 Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge
1992 “Previews: Gestures at the Transition Place”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992. 135-158.Google Scholar
Sun, Chao-Fen & Talmy Givón
1985 “On the So-Called SOV Word Order in Mandarin Chinese: A Quantified Text Study and Its Implications”. Language 61. 329-351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1906 A Primer of Phonetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Szczepek, Beatrice
2000a “Formal Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation”. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 17. 1-34.Google Scholar
2000b “Functional Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation”. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 21. 1-36.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2004 “Turn-final Intonation in English”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 97-118.
2006 Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
't Hart, Johan, Rene Collier & Antonie Cohen
1990 A Perceptual Study of Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tai, H.-Y. James
1976 “On the Change from SVO to SOV in Chinese”. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society 291-304. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Chunjian
2004 “Juwei ‘le’ Goucheng de Juzhi Yuyi ji Yuyong Gongneng” [The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Ended on ‘le’]. Hanyu Xuexi 2. 26-31.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko
1999 Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2000 “Turn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33:1. 1-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
1996 Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “Body Movement and Participant Alignment in Mandarin Conversational Interactions”. Papers from the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. II: The Panels 125-139. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tao, Liang, Barbara A. Fox & Jule Gómez de García
1999 “Tone-Choice Repair in Conversational Mandarin Chinese”. Cognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky & Laura A. Michaelis, 268-281. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Tarplee, Clare
1989 “Confirmation and Repair: An Interactional Analysis of Redoing Sequences in Child-Adult Talk”. York Papers in Linguistics 14. 279–296.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction”. Discourse Studies 7. 481-505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Barbara A Fox
2010 “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43:2. 133-156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry L. Smith
1951 An Outline of English Structure. New York: Johnson.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-Fu
1979 A Functional Study of Topic: The First Step towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Student Book.Google Scholar
Tsao, Wen-Yen
1967 Question in Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 2. 15-26.Google Scholar
Tseng, Chiu-Yu
2006 “Higher Level Organization and Discourse Prosody”. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, La Rochelle, April 2006.
Tseng, Chiu-Yu & Chun-Hsiang Chang
2008 Pause or No Pause? – Prosodic Phrase Boundaries Revisited. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13:4. 500-509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Gareth
2004a “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interactio”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 147–169
2004b The Phonetic Design of Turn Endings, Beginnings, and Continuations in Conversation. PhD Dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
2010 “The Phonetic Constitution of a Turn-Holding Practice: Rush-Rhroughs in English Talk-in-Interaction”. Barth-Weingarten, Reber & Selting 2010 51-72.
Wang, Li
1954[1947] Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa [Chinese Modern Grammar]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shuju.Google Scholar
Wang, Maolin, Maocan Lin & Aijun Li
2008 “Hanyu Ziran Duihua Yingao Yanjiu” [Pitch in Chinese Natural Conversation]. Shengxue Xuebao 2. 97-101.Google Scholar
Wang, Yin
1999 “Zhuwei Zhuyu he Huati de Sibian” [Theme, Subject and Topic]. Waiyu Yanjiu 3. 15-19.Google Scholar
Wang, Yunjia
2004 “Yingao he Shichang zai Hanyu Putonghua Qinsheng Zhijue zhong de Zuoyong” [The Effect of Pitch and Duration on the Perception of the Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese]. Shengxue Xuebao 5. 453-461.Google Scholar
Wells, Bill & John Local
1993 “The Sense of an Ending: A Case of Prosodic Delay”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 7. 59–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Bill, John Local & Sarah Macfarlane
1998 “Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-Projection and Overlap”. Language and Speech 41. 265–294.Google Scholar
Wells, Bill, John Local & Sue Peppé
1996 “Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and Turn-Taking in English Dialects”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996a 101–130.
Wen, Lian
1992 “Juzi de Lijie Celue” [Chinese Sentence Comprehension]. Zhongguo Yuwen 4. 260-264.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan, Regina
1997 “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior”. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8:2. 97-117.Google Scholar
2004 Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005 “‘There is More here than Meets the Eye!’: The Use of Final ou in Two Sequential Positions in Mandarin Chinese Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 37:7. 967-995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Initiating Repair and Beyond: The Use of Two Repeat-Formatted Repair Initiations in Mandarin Conversation”. Discourse Processes 41:1. 67-109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Zongji
1982 “Putonghua Yuju zhong de Shengdiao Bianhua” [Tonal Changes in Sentences in Standard Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 439-449.Google Scholar
1990 “Hanyu Putonghua Yudiao de Jiben Diaoxing” [Basic Patterns of Intonation in Standard Chinese]. Wang Li Xiansheng Jinian Lunwenji. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
1997 “Cong Shengdiao yu Yuelü de Guanxi Tichu Putonghua Yudiao Chuli de xin Fangfa” [A New Method of Mandarin Intoantion Processing]. Papers in Commemoration of the 45th Anniversity of Linguistics Institute of CASS 243-258. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Xiong, Ziyu & Maocan Lin
2004 “‘A’ de Yunlv Tezheng jiqi Huayu Jiaoji Gongneng” [Prosodic Features of “a” and Their Conversational Communicative Functions] Dandai Yuyanxue 2. 116-127.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Danqing Liu
1998 Huati de Jiegou yu Gongneng [Structure and Function of Topic]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xu, Yulong
1995 Resolving Third-Person Anaphora in Chinese Texts: Towards a Functional-Pragmatic Model. PhD Dissertation. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bojiang & Mei Fang
1996 Hanyu Gongneng Yufa Yanjiu [Functional Studies of Chinese Grammar]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei
1998 Repair in Chinese Conversation. PhD Dissertation. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi
1961 “Shuo ‘de’” [On de ]. Zhongguo Yuwen 12. 1-15.Google Scholar
1978 “‘De’ zi Jiegou he Panduanju’ [The De-Construction and Assertives]. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 23-27.Google Scholar
1982 Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
1985 Yufa Dawen [Grammar: Questions and answers]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
1999 Zhu Dexi Wenji Dier Juan [Essays of Zhu Dexi] Vol. 2. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Discourse studies
Pragmatics
Sino-Tibetan languages
BIC Subject: CF/2GDC – Linguistics/Chinese
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2013050138 | Marc record