Article published in:
Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 130
References
Anstey, M.
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: Multifunctional problems and constructional solutions. Linguistics , 46(4), 831–859. Crossref link
Baicchi, A.
(2013) What do constructions suggest about syntactic priming? Empirical evidence in L2 learners of English. Paper delivered at the III International Conference on Meaning Construction, Meaning Interpretation: Applications and Implications (CRAL 2013), held at theUniversity of La Rioja, Spain, July 18–20, 2013.
Bergen, B., & Chang, N.
(2013) Embodied Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. ­Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 168–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berry, M.
(1995) Thematic options and success in writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.). Thematic development in English texts (pp. 55–84). London: Pinter.
Biber, D.
(1988)  Variation across speech and writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2009) A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 14(3), 275–311. Crossref link
Brinton, L., & Traugott, E.C.
(2005)  Lexicalization and language change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Butler, C.S.
(2001) A matter of GIVE and TAKE: Corpus linguistics and the predicate frame. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses , 42, 55–78.
(2003a)  Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2003b)  Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2003c) Multiword sequences and their relevance for recent models of Functional Grammar. Functions of Language , 10(2), 179–208. Crossref link
(2006) On functionalism and formalism: A reply to Newmeyer. Functions of Language , 13(2), 197–227. Crossref link
(2009a) Lexical phenomena in Functional Discourse Grammar and Systemic Functional Linguistics. In S. Slembrouck, M. Taverniers, & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Studies in linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen: From will to well (pp. 55–67). Ghent: Academia Press.
(2009b) The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges. In C.S. Butler, & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 117–151). ­Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2012) Syntactic functions in Functional Discourse Grammar and Role and Reference Grammar: An evaluative comparison. Language Sciences , 34(4), 480–490\. Crossref link
Butler, C.S.
(2013) Constructions in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan, & E. ­Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics. The role of constructions in grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series, 145) (pp. 271–294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Butler, C.S., & Gonzálvez-García, F.
(2005). Situating FDG in functional-cognitive space: An initial study. In J.L. Mackenzie, & M.A. Gómez-González (Eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar (Linguistic Insights, 26) (pp. 109–158). Berne: Peter Lang.
(2014)  Exploring functional-cognitive space. (Studies in Language Companion Series) . ­Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Butler, C.S., & Taverniers, M.
(2008) Layering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics , 46(4), 689–756.
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P.J.
(Eds.) (2001)  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language, 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Bybee, J.
(2010)  Language, usage and cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. ­Hoffmann, & Trousdale, G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caffarel, A., Martin, J.R., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
(Eds.) (2004)  Language typology: A functional perspective . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Carnie, A., & Mendoza-Denton, N.
(2003) Functionalism is/n’t formalism: An interactive review of Darnell, et al. 1999. Journal of Linguistics , 39, 373–389. Crossref link
Chomsky, N.
(1995)  The minimalist program . Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Christie, F., & Unsworth, L.
(2005) Developing dimensions of an Educational Linguistics. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen, & J.J. Webster (Eds.). Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective , Vol. 1 (pp. 217–250). London: Equinox.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2001)  Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies . London: Longman.
Cornish, F.
(2000) L’accord, l’anaphore et la référence: Quelques enjeux. In M. Coene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale, & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), Studia linguistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski (pp. 509–533). Padua: Unipress.
Cortés-Rodríguez, F.
(2006) Derivational morphology in Role and Reference Grammar: A new proposal. RESLA: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada , 19, 41–66.
Croft, W.
(1990) A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: A taxonomy of propositional acts). Journal of Semantics , 7(3), 245–279. Crossref link
(1995) Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language , 71, 490–532. Crossref link
(2001)  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R.
(2005)  Simpler syntax . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E.A., Newmeyer, F.J., Noonan, M., & Wheatley, K.M.
(Eds.) (1999a)  Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume 1: General papers (Studies in Language Companion Series, 41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(Eds.) (1999b)  Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume 2: Case studies (Studies in Language Companion Series, 42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Denison, D.
(2010) Category change in English with and without structural change. In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language, 90) (pp. 105–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Dik, S.C.
(1997a)  The theory of functional grammar, Part 1: The structure of the clause (Functional Grammar Series, 20). 2nd edition. Ed. Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(1997b)  The theory of functional grammar, Part 2: Complex and derived constructions (Functional Grammar Series, 21). Ed. Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Eddington, D., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.
(2010) Argument constructions and language processing evidence from a priming experiment and pedagogical implications. In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 213–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fawcett, R.P.
(1973/1981) Generating a sentence in systemic functional grammar. University College London (mimeo). Reprinted In M.A.K. Halliday, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics (pp. 146–83). London: Batsford.
(1980)  Cognitive Linguistics and social interaction: Towards an integrated model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the other components of an interacting mind . ­Heidelberg: Julius Groos and Exeter University.
(1994) On moving on on ontologies: Mass, count and long thin things. In D. McDonald (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 71–80).Association for Computational Linguistics, available through Computer Science, Brandeis University, Waltham MA. Crossref link
(2000/2010)  A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Paperback edition with new Preface and updated bibliography 2010. Crossref link
(2008)  Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar . 3rd edition. London: Equinox.
(2012) Problems and solutions in identifying processes and participant roles in discourse analysis. Part 2: How to handle metaphor, idiom and six other problems. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics , 3, 27–76.
Fawcett, R.P., Tucker, G.H., & Lin, Y.Q.
(1993) How a Systemic Functional Grammar works: The role of realization in realization. In H. Horacek, & M. Zock (Eds.), New concepts in natural language generation (pp. 114–186). London: Pinter.
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P.
(1995)  Construction Grammar coursebook, chapters 1 thru 11 (Reading materials for Ling. X20) . University of California, Berkeley.
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language , 64, 501–538. Crossref link
García Velasco, D., & Hengeveld, K.
(2002) Do we need predicate frames?In R. Mairal Usón, & M.J. Pérez Quintero (Eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series, 25) (pp. 95–123). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
García Velasco, D.
(2009) Conversion in English and its implications for Functional Discourse Grammar. Lingua , 19, 1164–1185. Crossref link
Gisborne, N.
(2008) Dependencies are constructions: A case study in predicative complementation. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 219–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011) Constructions, Word Grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics , 22(1), 155–182. Crossref link
Givón, T.
(1989)  Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics . Hillsdale, NJ and London: ­Lawrence Erlbaum.
(1995)  Functionalism and grammar . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2001a)  Syntax: An introduction, Volume I . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2001b)  Syntax: An introduction, Volume II . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009)  The genesis of syntactic complexity: Diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A.E.
(1995)  Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument Structure . Chicago: Chicago University Press.
(2006)  Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language . New York: Oxford University Press.
(2013) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics , 15(3), 289–316. Crossref link
Gómez González, M.A.
(2001)  The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gómez González, M.A., Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Gonzálvez-García, F.
(Eds.) (2014)  The functional perspective on language and discourse: Applications and implications (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gonzálvez-García, F., & Butler, C.S.
(2006). Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 4, 39–96. Crossref link
Gonzálvez-García, F.
(2009) The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a usage-based constructionist analysis. Language Sciences , 31(5), 663–723. Crossref link
(2011) Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction. Linguistics , 49(6), 1305–1358. Crossref link
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1987/2003) Language and the order of nature. In C. MacCabe, N. Fabb, D. Attridge, & A. Durant (Eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature (pp. 135–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (Eds.). (2003). On language and linguistics (pp. 116–138). London: Continuum.
(1994a)  An introduction to Functional Grammar . 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
(1994b) Systemic theory. In R.E. Asher, & J.M.Y. Simpson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 4505–4508). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
(1999)  Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition . London and New York: Cassell.
(2004)  An introduction to Functional Grammar . 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
(2014)  Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar . 4th edition. London: Routledge.
Hasan, R., & Fries, P.H.
(1995) Reflections on subject and theme: An introduction. In R. Hasan, & P.H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 118) (pp. xiii–xlv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J.L.
(2008)  Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
(2006) Functional Discourse Grammar. In E.K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 4 (pp. 668–676). 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
(2010) Functional Discourse Grammar. In B. Heine, & H. ­Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 367–400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hengeveld, K.
(2011) The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In B. Heine, & H. ­Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 580–594). Oxford: Oxford ­University Press.
(2012) Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences , 34(4), 468–479. Crossref link
Hopper, P.J.
(1998) Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure). Vol. 1 (pp. 155–175). ­Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horie, K., & Comrie, B.
(2000) Introduction. In K. Horie (Ed.), Complementation (Cognitive and functional perspectives) (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 1) (pp. 1–10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hudson, R.A.
(2004) Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40, 105–130. Crossref link
(2006) Word Grammar. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 633–642). 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
(2007)  Language networks: The new Word Grammar . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2008) Word Grammar and Construction Grammar. In G. Trousdale, & N. ­Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 257–302). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009) Measuring maturity. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (Eds.), Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 349–362).London: Sage. Crossref link
(2010)  An introduction to Word Grammar . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Jackendoff, R.J.
(2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Keizer, M.E.
(2007) The grammatical-lexical distinction in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa-Revista de Lingüística , 51(2), 35–56.
(2013) The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In J.L. Mackenzie, & H. Olbertz (Eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series, 137) (pp. 213–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2006)  Reading images. The grammar of visual design . 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Laffut, A., & Davidse, K.
(2000) Verb meaning and construction sets: The case of caused NP-PrepP relations. LACUS Forum 1999 , 293–304.
Langacker, R.W.
(1987)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(1991)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application . ­Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Le Bellec, C.
(2009) L’accord du participe passé dans les langues romanes: Entre pragmatique et syntaxe. Revue Romane , 44(1), 1–26. Crossref link
Mackenzie, J.L., & Martínez Caro, E.
(2012)  Compare and contrast: An English grammar for speakers of Spanish (Colección: Estudios de Lengua Inglesa). Granada: Comares.
Mairal Usón, R., & Periñán-Pascual, J.C.
(2009) The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada , 22, 217–244.
Mairal Usón, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.
(2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In C.S. Butler, & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 153–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Martín Arista, J.
(2008) Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. Van Valin (Eds.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2009) A typology of morphological constructions. In C.S. Butler, & J. ­Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 85–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2011) Projections and constructions in functional morphology. The case of Old English HRĒOW. Language and Linguistics , 12(2), 393–425.
Martin, J.R., & Rose, D.
(2005) Designing literacy pedagogy. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen, & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective , Vol. 1 (pp. 251–280). London: Equinox.
Martin, J.R.
(1992a)  English text . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1992b) Genre and literacy-modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 13, 141–172. Crossref link
Martínez Vázquez, M.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations in a foreign language. VIAL, Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 1, 151–165.
Newmeyer, F.J.
(1998)  Language form and language function . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2003) Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language , 79(4), 682–707. Crossref link
(2005a)  Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
(2005b) Christopher S. Butler. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1. Approaches to the simplex clause & Part 2. From clause to discourse and beyond. Functions of Language , 12(2), 275–283. Crossref link
(2010) Formalism and functionalism in linguistics. WIREs Cogn Sci , 1, 301–307. Crossref link
Nolan, B., & Diedrichsen, E.
(Eds.) (2013a)  Linking constructions into functional linguistics. The role of constructions in grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series, 145). ­Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Nuyts, J.
(2005) Brothers in arms? On the relations between cognitive and functional linguistics. In F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 32) (pp. 69–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007) Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 543–565). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2011) Pattern versus process concepts of grammar and mind: A cognitive-functional perspective. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Painter, C.
(2009) Language development. In M.A.K. Halliday, & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 87–103). London: Continuum.
Periñán-Pascual, J.C., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2009) Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural , 43, 265–273.
Ravelli, L.J.
(2004) Signalling the organization of written texts: Hyper-themes in management and history essays. In L.J. Ravelli, & R.A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualised frameworks (pp. 104–130). London: Continuum.
Rijkhoff, J.
(2009) On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology , 13(1), 95–104. Crossref link
(2010) Functional categories in the noun phrase: On jacks-of-all trades and one-trick-ponies in Danish, Dutch and German. Deutsche Sprache , 2(Special issue: Modifikation im Deutschen: Kontrastive Untersuchungen zur Nominalphrase), 97–123.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Agustín, M.P.
(2013) La construcción reduplicativa de base léxica en español: Un estudio preliminar para estudiantes de español como L2. [‘The reduplicative construction with a lexical basis in Spanish: A preliminary study for students of Spanish as L2’]. In S. De Knop, F. Mollica, & J. Kuhn (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik und Romanische sprachen (pp. 205–225). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2008) Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica , 42(2), 355–400. Crossref link
(2011) Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English. Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 62–82). London: Equinox.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.
(2013) Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In E. Diedrichsen, & B. Nolan (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics. The role of constructions in grammar . (Studies in Language Companion Series, 145) (pp. 231–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Schleppegrell, M.
(2006)  The language of schooling. A functional linguistic perspective . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taboada, M., & Gómez-González, M.A.
(2013) Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. In M. Taboada, S. Doval-Suárez, & E. González-Álvarez (Eds.), Contrastive discourse analysis: Functional and corpus perspectives (pp. 17–41). Sheffield: Equinox.
Tagliamonte, S.A.
(2008)  So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics , 12(2), 361–394. Crossref link
Tagliamonte, S.A., & Roberts, C.
(2005)  So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech , 80(3), 280–300. Crossref link
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A.
(2006) The alchemy of the upwardly mobile: Symbolic capital and the stylization of elites in frequent-flyer programmes. Discourse and Society , 17(1), 99–135. Crossref link
Tomasello, M.
(1998) Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. 1 (ix–xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2003) Introduction: Some surprises for psychologists. In M Tomasello. (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. 2 (pp. vii–xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G.
(2010) Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect?In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2013)  Constructionalization and constructional changes . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Tucker, G.H.
(1998)  The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A Systemic Functional Approach to lexis . London: Cassell Academic.
(2007) Between lexis and grammar: Towards a systemic functional approach to phraseology. In C.M.I.M. Matthiessen, R. Hasan, & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Vol. 2. (pp. 953–977). London: Equinox.
Valenzuela, J., & Rojo, A.
(2008) What can language learners tell us about constructions?In S. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar – Volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 197–229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van Valin, R.D.Jr., & LaPolla, R.J.
(1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function (­Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Van Valin, R.D., Jr
(1993) A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In R.D. Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 82) (pp. 1–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2005)  Exploring the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface: An introduction to Role and Reference Grammar . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2006) Semantic macroroles and language processing. In I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, & A. Friederici (Eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycho-/neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 263–302). ­Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009) Privileged syntactic arguments, pivots and controllers. In L. ­Guerrero, S. Ibáñez, & V.A. Belloro (Eds.), Studies in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 45–68). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Wee, L., & Ying Ying, T.
(2008) That’s so last year! Constructions in a socio-cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics , 40(12), 2100–2113. Crossref link