Article published in:
Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change
Edited by Evie Coussé and Ferdinand von Mengden
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69] 2014
► pp. 120
References

References

Andersen, H.
(2006) Grammation, regrammation and degrammation. Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23, 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. & Pfänder, S.
(2011) Constructions: Emergent or emerging? In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent (pp. 1–21). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2006) From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82,711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Language, Usage and Cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Scheibman, J.
(1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37, 575–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Thompson, S.
(2000) Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, 65–85.Google Scholar
Clifford, J.
(1986) Introduction: Partial Truths. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (pp. 1–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000)  Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2002) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O.
(2007)  Morphosyntactic change: functional and formal perspectives . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32, 336–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 31–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H.
(2007) Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, P.
(2010)  Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics . Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Emergent and usage-based models of grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics (pp. 507–532). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991)  Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.
(1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139–157.Google Scholar
Keller, R.
(1994)  On language change: The invisible hand in language . London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. & Barlow, M.
(2000) Introduction: A Usage-Based Conception of Language. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. i–xxvii). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987)  Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 121–161). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1991)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003)  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
(1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57, 33–65.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & König, E.
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization (Vol. I, pp. 189–218). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & Dasher, R.
(2002)  Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

von Mengden, Ferdinand & Anneliese Kuhle
2020. Recontextualization and language change. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.