Third Person References

Forms and functions in two spoken genres of Spanish

| Gettysburg College
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027215819 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027267498 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This volume, a case study on the grammar of third person references in two genres of spoken Ecuadorian Spanish, examines from a discourse-analytic perspective how genre affects linguistic patterns and how researchers can look for and interpret genre effects. This marks a timely contribution to corpus linguistics, as many linguists are choosing to work with empirical data. Corpus based approaches have many advantages and are useful in the comparison of different languages as well as varieties of the same language, but what is often overlooked in such comparisons is the genre of language under examination. As this case study shows, genre is an important factor in interpreting patterns and distributions of forms.

The book also contributes toward theories of anaphora, referentiality and Preferred Argument Structure. It is relevant for scholars who work with referentiality, genre differences, third person references, and interactional linguistics, as well as those interested in Spanish morphosyntax.

[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 71]  2016.  ix, 179 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.71
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ix–x
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–12
Chapter 2. Research questions
13–34
Chapter 3. Data
35–40
Chapter 4. Coding
41–62
Chapter 5. Discourse referentiality
63–82
Chapter 6. Linguistic patterning of referents
83–130
Chapter 7. Linguistic patterns of non-referential expressions
131–146
Chapter 8. Genre differences
147–162
Chapter 9. Conclusions
163–168
References
169–176
Appendix
177–178
Index
179–180
“In this very thorough and detailed analysis, Dumont shows that third-person linguistic expressions are motivated by cognitive, interactional and discourse structural factors which at times act in tandem while at others in competition. This book is not only an important contribution to our knowledge of Spanish but more generally to the field of usage-based grammar.”
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Obeso, Estilita María Cassiani & Hiram L. Smith
2020. Variable plural marking in Palenquero Creole. Language Variation and Change 32:3 ► pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2018.  In Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 76], ► pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York, NY: Routledge,Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. J.
(1995) French presentational structures. In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti, & M. Phinney (Eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics, (pp. 91-104). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. J. & Bentivoglio, P.
(1993) Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 5,61-76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. J. & Bentivoglio
(1997) Strategies for introducing new referents into discourse: A comparative analysis of French and Spanish presentational structures. In R. M. Hammond, & M. G. MacDonald (Eds.). Linguistic studies in honor of Bohdan Saciuk (pp. 9-25). West Lafayette, IN: Learning Systems Inc.Google Scholar
Balasch, S.
(2011) Factors determining Spanish Differential Object Marking within its domain of variation. In J. Michnowicz and R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. (pp. 113-124). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.
(1999) Genre. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1-2), 84-87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, P.
1993 Full NPs in spoken Spanish: A discourse profile. In W. J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto, & Eduardo Raposo (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on the Romance languages (pp. 212-224). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2006) Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora 1(1): 1-37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Finegan, E.
(Eds.) (1994) Sociolinguistic perspective on register. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
(1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, S. E.
(2003) Implicatures in Discourse: The Case of Spanish NP Anaphora. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I.
(1989) Las categorías gramaticales. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Butt, J. & Benjamin, C.
(2004) A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. 4th edition. Chicago: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P.
(Eds.) 2001 Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R.
(1993) Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change. 5(3): 305-334.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Switch reference, verb class and priming in a variable syntax. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on variation in linguistic theory, 30(2), 27-45.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In C. Li (Ed.), Symposium on subject and topic(pp. 25-55)New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1980) (Ed.) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy [Advances in discourse processes] (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
(1985) Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing, (pp. 105-123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21-51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. & Schaefer, E.
(1989) Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science 13, 259-294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(1991) Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics 33, 839-882. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Intonation units and grammatical structure in Wardaman and English. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 27, 1-39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mello, G.
(1992) El artículo definido con nombre propio de persona en el español contemporáneo. Studia Neophilologica 64, 221-34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.
(1979) Ergativity. Language, 55, 59-138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donati, M.
(2010) Per una teoria del vocativo. Sistema, asimmetria e persona. Linguistica e Filologia, 30, 11–47.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J.
(1980) Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In W. Chafe (Ed.). The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. (pp. 203-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (Ed.). Iconicity in syntax. (pp. 343-366). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4), 805-855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003a) Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, (pp. 47-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003b) Argument structure. In J. Du Bois, L. Kumpf & W. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument Structure. Grammar as architecture for function. (pp. 11-60)Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J., Scheutze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D.
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse, (pp.45-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. & Thompson, S.
(1991) Dimensions of a theory of information flow. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Dumont, J.
(2006) Full NPs as Subjects. In N. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (Eds.). Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, (pp. 286-296). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2013) Another Look at the Present Perfect in an Andean Variety of Spanish: Grammaticalization and Evidentiality in Quiteño Spanish. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, et al.. (Eds), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, (pp. 279-291). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Durie, M.
(2003) New light on information pressure: Information conduits, “escape valves”, and role alignment stretching. In J. Du Bois, L. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument Structure, (pp. 159-196). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dutra, R.
(1987) The hybrid S-category in Brazilian Portuguese: Some implications for word order. Studies in Language, 11(1),163-180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, M.
(2005) Grammar and inference in conversation: Identifying clause structure in spoken Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, N.
(2002) Subject personal pronouns in Spanish narratives of Puerto Ricans in New York City: A sociolinguistic perspective. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ford, C. Fox, B., & Thompson, S.
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.) The language of turn and sequence, (pp. 14-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. & Thompson,S
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for turn management. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.) Interaction and Grammar, (pp. 134-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B.
(1987) Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. & Thompson, S.
(1990) A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English Conversation. Language, 66(2), 297-316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garachana Camarero, M.
(2009) La creación y generalización del artículo indefinido. In C. Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Segunda parte: La frase nominal (2 vols.).México: UNAM/FCE.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1978) Definiteness and referentiality. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language: Volume 4, Syntax, (pp. 291-330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Logic vs. pragmatics, with natural language as the referee. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 81-133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Functionalism and grammar. 1-42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Interactive footing. In Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.). (pp. 16-46)Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, C.
(2012) Noun phrase cohesion in English discourse: A corpus-based analysis of patterns and influences. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 44-57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R.
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274-307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, M.
(1995) On the future of the future tense in the Spanish of the Southwest. In C. Silva Corvalán (Ed.) Spanish in Four Continents: Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism, (pp. 214-226). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Haboud, M.
(1998) Quichua y castellano en los Andes ecuatorianos: Los efectos de un contacto prolongado[Quichua and Spanish in the Ecuadorian Andes: The effects of a prolonged contact]. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, M.
(1993) Noun phrases and clauses as syntacticized discourse units in Finnish conversational discourse. Ms. University of Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
(2001a) Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.) Studies in interactional linguistics. (pp. 25-50). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversational discourse. Studies in Discourse and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S.
(1989) Verbless presentation and the discourse basis for ergativity. In B. Music, R. Gracyzk, & C. Wiltshire (Eds.) Papers from the 25th annual regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Part two: Parasession on language in context . 123-37.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J.
(1986) Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 62(3):609-621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.
(1987) Emergent grammar. BLS 13, 139-157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., & S. Thompson
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2), 251-299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. Language, 60(4), 703-752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1990) List-construction as a task and a resource. In G. Psathas, (Ed.). Interaction Competence. (pp. 63-92)Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
(1996) Preferred argument structure and subject role in American English conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(5):675-701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, F.
(1976) “Same vs. different” cross-linguistically: The “articles” in English and Spanish. Papers from the regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic Society, 12: 413-424.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L.
(1992) Preferred Argument Structure and second language acquisition. Studies in Language, 16(2):369-403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Genre and preferred argument structure: Sources of argument structure in classroom discourse. In J. Du Bois, L. Kumpf, & W. Ashby (Eds.) Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, (pp. 109-130)Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Oral narratives of personal experience. In P. Hogan (Ed.). Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1988) There was a farmer had a dog: Syntactic amalgams revisted. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 319-39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: topoic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapidus, N., & Otheguy, R.
(2005) Contact induced change? Over nonspecific ellos in Spanish in New York. In L. Sayahi and M. Westmoreland (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the second workshop on Spanish sociolinguistics. (pp. 67-75)Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lerner, G.
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20, 441-458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, J.
(1994) Latin American Spanish. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K.
(2003) Intonation Units in Japanese conversation: Syntactic, informational, and functional structures. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63:81-97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, E.
(1990) Discourse pressure, register, and grammatical alignment - after Du Bois. Studies in Language, 14, 365-403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, T. & Thompson, S.
(1994) Unattached NPs in English Conversation. In Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 402-419). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Ortiz Ciscomani, R.
(2009) La creación y generalización del artículo definido. In Concepción Company Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Segunda parte: La frase nominal [Historic syntax of the Spanish language. Second part: The noun phrase] (2 vols.). México: UNAM/FCE.Google Scholar
Paredes Silva, V.
(1993) Subject omission and functional compensation: Evidence from written Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change, 5(1): 35-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, E.
(1981) Toward a typology of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.) Radical pragmatics. (pp. 223-55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. (pp. 295-325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4):696-735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakita, T.
(2003) Preferred argument structure for conversational reporting. Doshisha studies in language and culture, 6(2):275-297.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ayala, I.
(2003) Constructions as resources for interaction: Lists in English and Spanish conversation. Discourse Studies, 5, 323-349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The Spanish presentative verbal lexicon. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, (pp. 71-93). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In G. Button & J. Lee (Eds.) Talk and social organization, (pp. 70-85). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1996) Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.) Interaction and grammar, (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, J.
(2001) Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation In J. Bybee & P. Hopper Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, (pp. 61-89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Sociolingüística y pragmática del español. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
1992 NP intonation units and referent identification. In Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 237-247. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Thompson, S.
(1984) Subordination in formal and informal discourse. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics , 85-94.
(1997) Discourse motivations for the core-oblique distinction as a language universal. In A. Kamio (Ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, (pp.59-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125-164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. & Hopper, P.
(2001) Transitivity, clause structure and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, (pp. 27-60) Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R.
(1987) Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R. Tomlin (Ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse, (pp. 455-480). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, A.
(1993) Parametric variation in the licensing of nominals. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
(1996) Dialectal variation in the licensing of null referential and expletive subjects. In C. Parodi, C. Quicoli, M. Saltarelli & M. Zubizarreta (Eds.) Aspects of Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV March 10-13, 1994, (pp. 409-432). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110(5), 315-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. & Aaron
J (2003) Bare English-origin nouns in Spanish: Rates, constraints, and discourse functions. Language Variation and Change, 15, 289-238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. & Travis, C.
(2015) Foundations for the study of subject pronoun expression in Spanish in contact with English: Assessing interlinguistic (dis)similarity via intralinguistic variability. In A. Carvalho, R. Orozco & N. Lapidus Shin (Eds.) Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective, (pp. 169-188). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C.
(2005) The yo-yo effect: Priming in subject expression in Colombian Spanish. In R. Gess & E. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 2004 , (pp. 329-349). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
(2007) Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19(2), 101-135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
(1974) The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subjects

Linguistics

Romance linguistics
Theoretical linguistics
Syntax
Corpus linguistics
Functional linguistics
Semantics
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015042239 | Marc record