References
Bickel, B., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Zakharko, T., & Iemmolo, G.
(2015) Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In J. Fleischer, E. Rieken, & P. Widmer (Eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (pp. 29–51). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
(1926) A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2. (Reprinted in Readings in linguistics I, 4th ed., pp. 26–31, by M. Joos , Ed. (1957/1966), Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(1994) The grammaticization of zero: Asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 235–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. L.
(Eds.) (2015) Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, E.
(2006) The difference between zero and nothing: Swahili noun class prefixes 5 and 9/10. In J. Davis, R. J. Gorup, & N. Stern (Eds.), Advances in functional linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins (pp. 211–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
(2012) The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change, 24, 343–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.
(1992) Italian egli and lui: Grammatical meaning and inference (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University). (UMI No. 9313892)Google Scholar
(1995) Italian pronouns and the virtue of relative meaninglessness. In E. Contini-Morava & B. S. Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (pp. 423–440). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) A surpassingly simple analysis. In W. Reid, R. Otheguy, & N. Stern (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message (pp. 113–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The linguistics of William Diver and the linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure. In G. Hassler, & G. Volkmann (Eds.), History of linguistics in texts and concepts, vol. 1 (pp. 307–326). Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
(2016) Substance and structure in Columbia School linguistics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 48, 59–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017a) The semantic difference between Italian vi and ci . Lingua, 200, 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) The substance and value of Italian si. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diver, W.
(1974/2012) Substance and value in linguistic analysis. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 23–45). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1975/2012) The nature of linguistic meaning. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 47–63). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1978/2012) Putting the horse before the cart: Linguistic analysis and linguistic theory. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 101–133). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1986/2012) Latin se . In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 279–289). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1987/2012) The dual. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 87–99). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1990/2012) The elements of a science of language. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 65–84). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1992/2012) The Latin demonstratives. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 265–277). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(1995/2012) Theory. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 445–519). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Diver, W., & Davis, J.
(1993/2012) The phonology of the extremes: Or, What is a problem? In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 323–341). Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
(2012) Latin voice and case. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 195–245). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
García, E. C.
(1975) The role of theory in linguistic analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
(1983) Context dependence of language and of linguistic analysis. In F. Klein-Andreu (Ed.), Discourse perspectives on syntax (pp. 181–207). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
García, E. C., & Putte, F. V.
(1989) Forms are silver, nothing is gold. Folia Linguistica Historica, 21, 365–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorup, R. J.
(2006)  Se without deixis. In J. Davis, R. J. Gorup, & N. Stern (Eds.), Advances in functional linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins (pp. 195–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. S.
(1942) Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language, 18. (Reprinted in Readings in linguistics I, 4th ed., pp. 109–115, by M. Joos, Ed. (1957/1966), Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1946) From morpheme to utterance. Language, 22. (Reprinted in Readings in linguistics I, 4th ed., pp. 142–153, by M. Joos, Ed. (1957/1966), Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
(1942) A system of descriptive phonology. Language 18. (Reprinted in Readings in linguistics I, 4th ed., pp. 97–108, by M. Joos, Ed. (1957/1966), Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, A.
(1997)  The categories of grammar: French lui and le. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The linguistics of William Diver and the Columbia School. WORD, 52, 29–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Introduction: The enduring legacy of William Diver. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior. The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 1–20). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1969) Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1979) Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. Syntax and Semantics, 12, 311–335.Google Scholar
Ono, T., & Thompson, S. A.
(1997) Deconstructing 'zero anaphora' in Japanese. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 481–491.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R.
(2002) Saussurean anti-nomenclaturism in grammatical analysis: A comparative theoretical perspective. In W. Reid, R. Otheguy, & N. Stern (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message (pp. 373–403). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Preface. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. L. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. ix–xi). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C.
(2012) Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reid, W.
(1991) Verb and noun number in English: A functional explanation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2011) The communicative function of English verb number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 1087–1146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russi, C.
(2008) Italian clitics: An empirical study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F.
(1878) Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européenes. Paris. Published in Recueil des publications scientifiques de F. de Saussure, Geneva (1922) Cited in Diver, W. (1974/2012).Google Scholar
(1916/1972) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A.
(2006) Null objects across South America. In T. L. Face, & C. A. Klee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 23–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tippets, I.
(2011) Differential object marking: Quantitative evidence for underlying hierarchical constraints across Spanish dialects. In L. A. Ortiz-López (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 13th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 107–117). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Walker, J. A.
(2009) The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85 )2), 321–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sources of data

Devoto, G.
(1951) Gli antichi italici. 2nd edition. Firenze: Vallecchi.Google Scholar
Calvino, I.
(1951) Il visconte dimezzato. New York: Appleton, 1968.Google Scholar
Rigoni Stern, M.
(1962) Il sergente nella neve: Ricordi della ritirata di Russia. Torino: Einaudi, 1964.Google Scholar
Silone, I.
(1937) Pane e vino. Lugano: Capolago.Google Scholar