Part of
Talking and Testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiencyEdited by Richard Young and Agnes Weiyun He
[Studies in Bilingualism 14] 1998
► pp. 27–
Edited by Richard Young and Agnes Weiyun He
[Studies in Bilingualism 14] 1998
► pp. 27–
Re-analyzing the OPI
How Much Does It Look Like Natural Conversation?
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Choi, YunDeok, Sonca Vo & Gary J. Ockey
2023. Investigation into the factor structure of a local English placement test of oral communication. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 
Johnson, Marysia
2022. Interaction in the oral proficiency interview. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 215 ff.
Eizaga-Rebollar, Bárbara & Cristina Heras-Ramírez
2020. Assessing pragmatic competence in oral proficiency interviews at the C1 level with the new CEFR descriptors. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Youn, Soo Jung
2020. Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels. Language Testing 37:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Youn, Soo Jung
2020. Interactional Features of L2 Pragmatic Interaction in Role‐Play Speaking Assessment. TESOL Quarterly 54:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Galaczi, Evelina & Lynda Taylor
2018. Interactional Competence: Conceptualisations, Operationalisations, and Outstanding Questions. Language Assessment Quarterly 15:3 ► pp. 219 ff.
STAPLES, SHELLEY, DOUGLAS BIBER & RANDI REPPEN
2018. Using Corpus‐Based Register Analysis to Explore the Authenticity of High‐Stakes Language Exams: A Register Comparison of TOEFL iBT and Disciplinary Writing Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 102:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Ross, Steven J.
2017. Language Proficiency Interviews and the Assessment of Speaking. In Interviewing for Language Proficiency, ► pp. 1 ff.
Staples, Shelley, Geoffrey T. Laflair & Jesse Egbert
2017. Comparing Language Use in Oral Proficiency Interviews to Target Domains: Conversational, Academic, and Professional Discourse. The Modern Language Journal 101:1 ► pp. 194 ff.
Leyland, Christopher, Tim Greer & Ellen Rettig-Miki
2016. Dropping the devil’s advocate: One novice language tester’s shifting interactional practices across a series of speaking tests. Classroom Discourse 7:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Pan, Mingwei
2016. Literature Review. In Nonverbal Delivery in Speaking Assessment, ► pp. 9 ff.
Sandlund, Erica, Pia Sundqvist & Lina Nyroos
2016. Testing L2 Talk: A Review of Empirical Studies on Second‐Language Oral Proficiency Testing. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Fosgerau, Christina Fogtmann
2013. The co-construction of understanding in Danish naturalization interviews. International Journal of Bilingualism 17:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele & Steven J. Ross
2013. Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ockey, Gary J., Dennis Koyama & Eric Setoguchi
2013. Stakeholder Input and Test Design: A Case Study on Changing the Interlocutor Familiarity Facet of the Group Oral Discussion Test. Language Assessment Quarterly 10:3 ► pp. 292 ff.
Ginther, April
2012. Assessment of Speaking. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Ginther, April
2020. Assessment of Speaking. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Lazaraton, Anne
2012. Discourse Analysis in Language Assessment. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Gan, Zhengdong & Chris Davison
2011. Gestural behavior in group oral assessment: a case study of higher‐ and lower‐scoring students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
HUTH, THORSTEN
2010. Can Talk Be Inconsequential? Social and Interactional Aspects of Elicited Second‐Language Interaction. The Modern Language Journal 94:4 ► pp. 537 ff.
Luk, Jasmine
2010. Talking to Score: Impression Management in L2 Oral Assessment and the Co-Construction of a Test Discourse Genre. Language Assessment Quarterly 7:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Malone, Margaret E. & Megan J. Montee
2010. Oral Proficiency Assessment: Current Approaches and Applications for Post‐Secondary Foreign Language Programs. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:10 ► pp. 972 ff.
Ockey, Gary J.
2009. The effects of group members' personalities on a test taker's L2 group oral discussion test scores. Language Testing 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Gan, Zhengdong
2008. Examining negotiation in peer group oral assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 3.1 ff.
Gan, Zhengdong
2008. Examining negotiation in peer group oral assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 3.1 ff.
Sussex, Roland & Rachel Varshney
2008. Notice to readers. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 2.1 ff.
Walters, F. Scott
2007. A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing 24:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
WALTERS, F. SCOTT
2009. A Conversation Analysis—Informed Test of L2 Aural Pragmatic Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 43:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Walters, F. Scott
2013. Interfaces between a discourse completion test and a conversation analysis-informed test of L2 pragmatic competence. In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, ► pp. 172 ff.
Walters, F. Scott
2021. Some Considerations Regarding Validation in CA-Informed Oral Testing for the L2 Classroom. In Classroom-based Conversation Analytic Research [Educational Linguistics, 46], ► pp. 383 ff.
Hughes, Rebecca
2004. Testing the visible: literate biases in oral language testing. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:3 ► pp. 295 ff.
Kondo‐Brown, Kimi
2004. Investigating Interviewer‐Candidate Interactions During Oral Interviews for Child L2 Learners. Foreign Language Annals 37:4 ► pp. 601 ff.
Brown, Annie
2003. Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Malvern, David & Brian Richards
2002. Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.