Article published in:
Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo
[Studies in Bilingualism 49] 2016
► pp. 8198
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M
(2010) White paper: Prolegomena to heritage linguistics. National Heritage Language Resource Center. Retrieved from http://​nhlrc​.ucla​.edu​/pdf​/hl​-whitepaper​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D.C
(1996) Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(3), 664–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C
(1999) Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eye-tracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition, 27, 826–833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cedrus Corporation
(1992) SuperLab (Version 4.0.5). San Pedro, CA.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Maia, M., Fernández, E., & Lourenco-Gomes, M.C
(2006) Early and late preferences in relative clause attachment in Brazilian and European Portuguese. Poster presented at the 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence processing. New York, NY: March 23-25.
Crocker, M
(1999) Mechanisms for sentence processing. In Language Processing, S. Garrod & M.J. Pickering (Eds.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D.C
(1988) Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30(1), 73–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C., & Corley, M.M.B
(1996) Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J.E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145–187). Mahwah, NH: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R
(1993) Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(2), 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P
(2003) Syntactic ambiguity resolution in second language learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Parsing a first language like a second: The erosion of L1 parsing strategies in Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 355–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P., & Sagarra, N
(2007) The effect of exposure on parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, K., Fernández, E., Fodor, J.D., Stenshoel, E., & Vinereanu, M
(1999) Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian and Romanian. Poster session presented at the 12th annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing , New York, NY.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A
(2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, E
(2002) Relative clause attachment in bilinguals and monolinguals. In R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 187–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The prosody produced by Spanish-English bilinguals: A preliminary investigation and implications for sentence processing. Revista da ABRALIN, 4, 109–141.Google Scholar
Fernández, E.M
(2007) How might a rapid serial visual presentation of text affect the prosody projected implicitly during silent reading? Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasiliera de Lingüística, 5, 117–154.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.D
(1998) Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, Aix-en-Provence , France. Retrieved from http://​www​.gc​.cuny​.edu​/CUNY​_GC​/media​/CUNY​-Graduate​-Center​/PDF​/Programs​/Linguistics​/Psycholinguistics​-Cannot​-Escape​-Prosody​.pdf
Frazier, L
(1987) Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 561–586). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C
(1996) Construal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., Keating, G.D., & VanPatten, B
(2016) On-line relative clause attachment strategy in heritage speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D.C
(1997) Relative clause attachment: Nondeterminism in Japanese parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), 247–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J
(2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M
(2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H.K., & Kaushanskaya, M
(2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teira, C., & Igoa, J.M
(2007) The prosody-syntax relationship in sentence processing. Anuario de Psicología, 38(1), 45–69.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chrabaszcz, Anna, Elena Onischik & Olga Dragoy
2021. Sentence comprehension in heritage language: Isomorphism, word order, and language transfer. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832199790 ff. Crossref logo
Jegerski, Jill
2018. Sentence Processing in Spanish as a Heritage Language: A Self‐Paced Reading Study of Relative Clause Attachment. Language Learning 68:3  pp. 598 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
Ruíz, Jason Omar & Pedro Macizo
2021. Ambiguous Sentence Processing in Translation. Psicológica Journal 42:2  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.