Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo
[Studies in Bilingualism 49] 2016
► pp. 99–124

Losing your case? Dative experiencers in Mexican Spanish and heritage speakers in the United States

ORCID logo | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

This chapter examines the gradual loss of dative case marking with dative experiencer verbs among Spanish heritage speakers of Mexican-American origin, first generation adult immigrants from Mexico, and two control groups of Spanish native speakers from Mexico tested in Mexico. According to the results of the written production task, heritage speakers and adult immigrants tend to omit the “a” with gustar-type verbs whereas the native speakers from Mexico do not omit a-marking in written production. Interestingly all bilingual groups, and even several native speakers from Mexico accepted ungrammatical sentences without a-marking in the acceptability judgment task. These results suggest that the erosion of dative case marking with dative experiencer subjects is a tendency already present in the monolingual variety. Although incomplete acquisition and attrition due to insufficient input and use may lead to an eventually different grammar in first and second generation immigrants, the results of this study support the claim that a language contact situation accelerates changes already in progress in monolingual varieties (Silva-Corvalán, 1994). ungrammatical sentences without a-marking in the acceptability judgment task

Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.49.06mon
References
Amaral, L., & Roeper, T
(2014) Multiple grammars and second language representations. Second Language Research, 30, 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L
(1988) Psych-Verbs and θ-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M
(2013a) Keynote article. Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Defining and “ideal” heritage speaker: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Reply to peer commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 259–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M
(2011) Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J
(2003) Knowledge of clitic doubling in Spanish. Evidence against pattern learning. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development. In honor of Lydia White (pp. 305–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, M
(2006) Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dvorak, T., & Kirschner, C
(1982) Mary likes fishes: Reverse psychological phenomena in New York Puerto Rican Spanish. Bilingual Review, 9, 59–65.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, T
(2000) Dative vs. nominative: Changes in quirky subjects in Icelandic. In D. Nelson & P. Foulkes (Eds.), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 27–44.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Mackay, I., & Piske, T
(2002) Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huffines, M
(1989) Case usage among the Pennsylvania German sectarian and nonsectarians. In N. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence. Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 211–226). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larmouth, D
(1974) Differential interference in American Finnish cases. Language, 50, 356–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D
(1991) How to set parameters. Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999) The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
In press). Imperfect transmission and discontinuity. In A. Ledgway & I. Roberts (Eds.) Cambridge handbook of historical syntax Cambridge CUP
Maandi, K
(1989) Estonian among immigrants in Sweden. In N. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating Obsolescence. Studies in Language Contraction and Death (pp. 227–242). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhorter, J
(2007) Language interrupted. Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masullo, P
(1992) Incorporation and case theory in Spanish. A crosslinguistic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. Elsig, M., & Rinke, E
(2013) Language acquisition and change. A morphosyntactic perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moag, R
(1995) Semi-native speakers. How to hold and mold them. In V. Gambhir (Ed.), The teaching and acquisition of South Asian languages (pp. 168–181). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S
(1996) Clitic-doubled dative subjects in Spanish. In K. Zagona (Ed.), Grammatical theory and Romance languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 133) (pp. 183–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) On the parallels between diachronic change and interlanguage grammars: the L2 acquisition of the Spanish dative case system. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 87–113.Google Scholar
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor (Studies in Bilingualism 39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 155–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Searching for the roots of structural changes in the Spanish of the United States. Lingua, 151, 177–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M
(2009) Back to basics: Differential object marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 363–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners? Dative case marking in Spanish. The Heritage Language Journal, 7(1), 47–73.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N
(2013) Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20, 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., Bhatia, A
(2012) Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 141–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R
(2015) Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 91(3), 564-610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S
(2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A.C
(2012) Spanish in New York. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D
(2013) Agreement reflexes of emerging optionality in heritage speaker Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J
(2009) Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammar. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M
(2006) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
de Prada Pérez, A., & Pascual y Cabo, D
(2011) Invariable gusta in the Spanish of heritage Speakers in the U.S. In J. Hershenschon & D. Tanner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rothman, J
(2007) Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A
(1985) Young People's Dyirbal. An Example of Language Death from Australia. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C
(1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., & Lee, M
(1997) The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y.-H. Kim (Ed.), Korean language in America 2 (pp. 111–127). Honolulu, HI: American Association of Teachers of Korean.Google Scholar
Toribio, A.J., & Nye, C
(2006) Restructuring of reverse psychological predicates. In New perspectives on Romance linguistics, Vol.1: Morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 275) (pp. 263–277). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolford, E
(2006) Lexical case, inherent case and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zobolou, K
(2011) Attrition in Greek diaspora: Grammars in contact or incomplete acquisition? In K. Ihemere (Ed.), Language contact and language shift: Grammatical and sociolinguistic perspectives (Lincom Studies in Language Typology 17). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Coskun Kunduz, Aylin & Silvina Montrul
2022. Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:4 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Luque, Alicia, Eleonora Rossi, Maki Kubota, Megan Nakamura, César Rosales, Cristina López-Rojas, Yulia Rodina & Jason Rothman
2023. Morphological transparency and markedness matter in heritage speaker gender processing: an EEG study. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Pascual y Cabo, Diego
2020. Examining the role of cross-generational attrition in the development of Spanish as a heritage language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.