Chapter published in:
Bilingual Cognition and Language: The state of the science across its subfields
Edited by David Miller, Fatih Bayram, Jason Rothman and Ludovica Serratrice
[Studies in Bilingualism 54] 2018
► pp. 5778
References

References

Archibald, J.
(1992) Transfer of L1 parameter-settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301–339.Google Scholar
Belikova, A., & White, L.
(2009) Evidence for the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis or not? Island constraints revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass, & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C.
(1998) The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.
(2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Autonomous induction theory. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (1st ed., 155–173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1998) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P.
(1986) The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R.
(1983) The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, K.
(2015) A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Hathorn, J.
(2005)  Quelque chose … de remarquable in English-French acquisition: Mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research, 21, 291–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2009) Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Long, M.
(2003) The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, E., & Kaye, J.
(1990) A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition, 34,137–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.
(2007) Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition. In M. Penke & A. Rosenbach (Eds.), What counts as evidence in linguistics: The case of innateness (pp. 217–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., & Wulff, S.
(2015) Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., 75–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finer, D., & Broselow, E.
(1986) Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16 (pp. 154–168). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Franceschina, F.
(2001) Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L.
(2004) Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace, & M. Ota (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, Vol 4 (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. R.
(1996) The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, K.
(2003) The state of emergentism in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 19, 95–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T.
(2005/2006) Another take on the L2 initial state: Evidence from comprehension in L2 German. Language Acquisition, 13, 287–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H.
(1997) The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H.
(2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22, 269–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S.
(2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D.
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 463–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1253–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. & Newport, E.
(1991) Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A.
(2004) Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E., Baek, S., & Tremblay, A.
(2016) The role of island constraints in second language sentence processing. Language Acquisition, 22, 384–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J.
(1989) On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. H., Kim, J.-H., & Schwartz, B. D.
(2007) The status of subjacency in L2 children, L2 adults and L1 children: Revisiting Johnson & Newport (1991) Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, October 2007.
Meisel, J.
(1997) The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 227–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W.
(2003) The radical middle: Nativism without Universal Grammar. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 19–42). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The emergentist program. Lingua, 118, 447–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Kwak, H.-Y.
(2009) Emergentism and second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 69–88). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schultz, B.
(2011) Filler-gap dependences and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortifelli, R., & Grüter, T.
(2013) Do null subjects really transfer? In J. Cabrelli Amaro, T. Judy, & D. Pascual y Cabo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2013) (pp. 145–154). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö.
(2016) Acquisition of L2 Turkish prosody: The effects of purely phonological and phonosyntactic issues. In A. Gürel (Ed.), Second language acquisition of Turkish (pp. 19–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pater, J.
(1997) Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In S. J. Hannahs, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A.
(2015) Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G., & Reiss, C.
(Eds.) (2007) The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E.
(1993) Where’s gender? Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 795–803.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R.
(1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1990) On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6, 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) When syntactic theories evolve: Consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–186). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12, 7–39 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(1985) The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 47–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L., & Juffs, A.
(1998) Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111–129). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H.
(Eds.) (2013) Universal Grammar and the second language classroom. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Kim, Sujeong, Heejeong Ko & Hyun-Kwon Yang
2020. Telicity and mode of merge in L2 acquisition of resultatives. Language Acquisition 27:2  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Ian Cunnings, Fatih Bayram, David Miller, Susagna Tubau & Jason Rothman
2018. Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
SLABAKOVA, ROUMYANA
2019. “L” Stands for Language. The Modern Language Journal 103  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.