Cover not available
Part of
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 95–119

Chapter 4
Animacy-based processing loads in anaphora resolution in (non-native) French

Evidence for privileged interface representations

| Indiana University, Bloomington
| Indiana University
| University of Tennessee, Knoxville
| Indiana University

This article examines animacy-based processing loads in conceptual structure in native and non-native processing of French during the resolution of pronouns lui/elle ‘3p.sing.masc/fem’, son ‘3p.sing.gen,’ and le/la ‘3p.sing.masc/fem.acc’ in displaced constituents under reconstruction. Both lui and son in décision (à propos de lui)/(à son sujet) ‘decision about him’ involve complements, whereas le in décision le concernant ‘decision regarding him’ involves modification. In a group of advanced non-native speakers, animacy activations linked to lui differed from those linked to son relative to baseline le, despite complement status. This was not the case in native speakers. We argue that processing lui/elle vs. son in conceptual structure engages animacy at distinct levels, reflecting lexical selection and indicating that lexically defined interface representations are privileged.

Keywords: anaphora, co-reference, binding, conceptual structure, sentence processing
Article outline
  • Grammatical architecture and anaphora in French
  • The study
    • The activation of animacy: PIRH claims
    • Capturing activation patterns: Methods
    • Predictions
    • Procedures and participants
  • Results
    • Experiment 1
    • Experiment 2
  • Summary and discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.04dek
References
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–32.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006a) Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 107–126.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Grammatical processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L.
(2001) The universal parser and interlanguage: Domain-specific mental organization in the comprehension of combien interrogatives in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research, 17(2), 91–143.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Second language epistemology: Take two. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 291–321.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) On the nature and development of semantic knowledge in second language acquisition. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 461–481). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Miller, A. K.
(2013) Inhibitive and facilitative priming induced by traces in the processing of wh-dependencies in a second language. Second Language Research, 29(3), 345–372.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Renaud, C.
(2014) On second language processing and grammatical development: The parser in second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 131–165.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. Grantham O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2006): The Banff conference (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Sprouse, R. A.
(2001) Mental design and (second) language epistemology: Adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research, 17(1), 1–35.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) L2 performance: Interlanguage representations, computations, and intuitions. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2002) (pp. 45–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Anderson, B.
(1997) The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: The process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition, 6(4), 297–332.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I.
(2012) Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 571–603.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1983) Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L.
(2013) Syntax in sentence processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Frimu, R.
(2017) Non-linguistic cognitive dimensions of subject-verb agreement error detection in (L2) French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University Bloomington.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., & Warren, T.
(2004) Reading‐time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long‐distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 55–78.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J.
(2016) Coreference and discourse coherence in L2. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(2), 199–229.Google Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1987) Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O.
(1982) Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lebeaux, D.
(1988) Language acquisition and the form of the grammar (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. & Phillips, C.
(2015) Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 27–46.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López Prego, B., & Gabriele, A.
(2014) Examining the impact of task demands on morphological variability in native and non-native Spanish. Linguistics Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 192–221.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, T., & Swinney, D.
(1996) Conference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5–24.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L.
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Albritton, D., & Ratcliff, R.
(1996) Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1494–1497.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1994) Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1239–1243.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K.
(2015) Facilitating the task for second language processing research: A comparison of two testing paradigms. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 613–637.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C., Trompelt, H., & Felser, C.
(2014) The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution. Frontiers in psychology, 5.DOI logo.Google Scholar
Picallo, C.
(1994) Catalan possessive pronouns: The Avoid Pronoun Principle revisited. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12, 259–299.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renaud, C.
(2010) On the nature of agreement in English-French acquisition: A processing investigation in the verbal and nominal domains (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University Bloomington.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(2013) Locality. Lingua, 130, 169–186.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L.
(2013) Sentence processing in bilinguals. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing, (pp. 221–246). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D.
(1999) Let’s make up your mind. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 635–655.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(1994) Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, 31(4), 71–89.Google Scholar
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimanskaya, E. M.
(2015) Feature reassembly of semantic and morphosyntactic pronominal features in L2 acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2006) Is there a critical period for semantics? Second Language Research, 22(3), 302–338.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 280–294). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2013) Adult second language acquisition: A selective overview with a focus on the learner linguistic system. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(1), 48–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(4), 543–559.Google Scholar
(2016) Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, L.
(1996) Clitics in L2 French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 335–367). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A.
(2000) Les pronoms forts du français sont-ils [+animés]? Spécification morphologique et spécification sémantique. In M. Coene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale, & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), Traiani Augusti Vestigia Pressa Sequamur: Studia Linguistica in Honorem Lilianae Tasmowski (pp. 663–679). Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Dekydtspotter, Laurent, A. Kate Miller, Mike Iverson, Yanyu Xiong, Kyle Swanson, Charlène Gilbert & Julie Franck
2023. The timing versus resource problem in nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from a time-frequency analysis of anaphora resolution in successive wh-movement in native and nonnative speakers of French. PLOS ONE 18:1 ► pp. e0275305 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.