Chapter published in:
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 229260
References

References

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
(2007).The role of second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Behind the L2 status factor: A neurolinguistic framework of L3 research. In J. Cabrelli-Amaro, J. Rothman, & S. Flynn (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 71–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(2012) Enhanced L3/Ln acquisition and its implications for language teaching. In D. Gabrys-Berker (Ed.), Cross-linguistic influences in multilingual language acquisition (pp. 1–22). Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borg, K.
(2013) The acquisition of future of probability in L3 Spanish. Paper presented at the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, Gainesville, FL.
Cabrelli Amaro, J.
(2015) Does the source of transfer affect the rate of L3 morphosyntactic development? Paper presented at the 40th annual Boston University Conference in Language Development, Boston, MA.
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J.
(2012) Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, V., Tubau, S., Cheylus, A. & Espinal, M. T.
(2015) Double negation in a negative concord language: An Experimental Investigation. Lingua, 163, 75–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. T., & Tubau, S.
(2016) Meaning of words, meaning of sentences. Building the meaning of n-words. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance (pp. 187–212). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
EULP2013
(2013) Els usos linguistics de les Comarques Centrals. Accessed 14 May, 2017.Google Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2010) The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48(2–3), 185–220.Google Scholar
(2011) Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27, 69–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. M.
(2016) Source(s) of syntactic CLI: The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani-Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 31, 225–245.Google Scholar
Fallah, N., & Jabbari, A.
(2016) L3 acquisition of English attributive adjectives: Dominant language of communication matters for syntactic cross-linguistic influence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 8(2), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2010) The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48(2–3), 185–220.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., C. Foley & I. Vinnitskaya
(2004) The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foote, R.
(2009) Transfer and L3 acquisition: The role of typology. In Y. I. Leung (Ed.) Third language acquisition and universal grammar. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Giancaspro, D., Halloran, B., & Iverson, M.
(2015) Transfer at the initial stages of L3 Brazilian Portuguese: A look at three groups of English/Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 191–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González Alonso, J., Rothman, J., Berndt, D., Castro, T., & Westergaard, M.
(2016) Broad scope and narrow focus: On the contemporary lingüístic and psycholinguistic study of L3 acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez Alonso, J., & Rothman, J.
(2017) Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697.Google Scholar
González Alonso, J., Rothman, J., Berndt, D., Castro, T., & Westergaard, M.
(2017) Broad scope and narrow focus: On the contemporary lingüístic and psycholinguistic study of L3 acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(56), 639–650.Google Scholar
Hermas, A.
(2010) Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial State. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 343–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The categorazation of the relative complementizer phrase in third-language English: A feature re-assembly account. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 587–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Montrul, S., & Santos, H.
(2011) Transfer in L2 and L3 acquisition of generic interpretation. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 283–295). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Iverson, M.
(2009) N-drop at the initial stage of L3 Portuguese: Comparing simultaneous and additive bilinguals of English/Spanish. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (pp. 221–244). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Informing the age of acquisition debate: L3 as a litmust test. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48, 221–243.Google Scholar
Jin, F.
(2009) Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or L1 infulence? In Y. I. Leung (Ed.) Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 144–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.
(1980) Lexical decomposition in Montague grammar. Theoretical Linguistics, 7, 121–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J.
(2014) Self-paced reading. In J. Jegerski & B. Van Patten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Judy, T.
(2013) Sources of performance and processing errors in near-native L2 Spanish speakers, L1 Farsi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Wooeley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigm and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, E.
(1964) Negation in English. In J. A. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language. Reading in the philosophy of language (pp. 246–323). Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Laka, I.
(1990) Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Leung, Y.
(2009) Third language acquisition and universal grammar. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Na Ranong, S., & Leung, Y. I.
(2009) Null Objects in Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem. In Y. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 144–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marinis, T.
(2010) Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 139–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M.
(2011) Bilingual language acquisition and teories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as a cause and effect of gramatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 121–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penka, P.
(2011) Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penka, P., & Zeilstra, H.
(2010) Negation and polarity: An introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 771–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J.
Submitted). Methodology matters! A research synthesis of third language (L3) morphosyntax studies.
Puig-Mayenco, E., Marsden, H.
(2018) Polarity item anything in L3 English: where does transfer come from when the L1 is Catalan and the L2 is Spanish? Second Language Research. https://​doi​.org​. ​/10​.1177​/0267658317747926 Google Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Miller, D., & Rothman, J.
(2016) Language dominance effects bilingual competence and processing. Paper presented at the Workshop on Heritage Language Acquisition: Breaking New Ground in Domains of Inquiry, Trømso, Norway.
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., & Judy, T.
(2011) Introduction: Some notes on the generative study of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 27, 5–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J.
(2010) What variables condition syntactic transfer: A look at the initial State. Second Language Research, 26, 189–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2010) On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 48(2–3), 245–273.Google Scholar
(2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011 (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Alemán Bañón, J., & González Alonso, J.
(2015) Neurolinguistic measures of typological effects in multilingual transfer: Introducing an ERP methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.Crossref.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S.
(2011) Contact x time: External factors and variability in L1 attrition. In M. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos (pp. 155–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R.
, (1996) L2 Cognitive states and full transfer/full acess hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2017) The scalpel model of third language acquisition. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P.
(2015) The L3 syntax-discourse interface. Applied Linguistics, 36, 671–699.Google Scholar
Temmerman, T.
(2012) Multidominance, ellipisis, and quantifier scope (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Leiden University.Google Scholar
Tubau, S., & Espinal, M. T.
(2012) Doble negació dins l’oració simple en català. Estudis Romànics, 34, 145–164.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & Warren, T.
(2010) Beginning adult L2 learners’ sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 7, 1092–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tubau, S.
(2008) Negative concord in English and Romance: Syntax-morphology interface conditions on the expression of negation. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
(2016) On the syntax of English minimizers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34, 739–760.Google Scholar
Wagers, M., Lau, E., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 2, 206–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., & Mykhavylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
(2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Patten, B., & Williams, J.
(2007) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd edn). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watanabe, A.
(2004) The genesis of negatice concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiries, 35, 569–612.Google Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M.
(2012) Foreign accentedness in third language acquisition: The case of L3 English. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 381–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeilstra, H.
(2004) Sentential negation and negative concord (Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation). Utrecht: LOT publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Angelovska, Tanja, Dietmar Roehm & Sabrina Weinmüller
2020. Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Guo, Yanyu & Boping Yuan
2020. Facilitative transfer only?. Journal of Second Language Studies 3:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jorge González Alonso & Jason Rothman
2020. A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research 36:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jason Rothman & Susagna Tubau
2020. Language dominance in the previously acquired languages modulates rate of third language (L3) development over time: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.