Cover not available
Part of
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 263–282

Chapter 10
What is easy and what is hard

Lessons from linguistic theory and SLA research

| McGill University

This chapter presents an overview of research, past and present, which has explored the extent to which linguistic theory and generative second language (L2) research offer insights for the language classroom. A number of issues are addressed, including the potential role of negative evidence, questions raised by linguistically misleading input, and linguistic accounts relating to acquisition orders. Consideration is given to proposals grounded in linguistic description (such as Slabakova’s Bottleneck Hypothesis) and how such proposals can help to pinpoint problem areas for L2 learners, as well as ways of making such descriptions accessible to language teachers. It is concluded that uncovering implications for language teaching is a bonus and not a requirement of research on second language acquisition.

Keywords: Bottleneck Hypothesis, Feature Reassembly Hypothesis, Learnability, Negative evidence, Positive evidence, Universal Grammar (UG), Verb raising/verb movement
Article outline
  • Early approaches
  • What we don’t need to teach
  • Learnability considerations
    • Effects of negative evidence in the classroom
    • Inappropriate or misleading classroom input
  • Linked properties
    • Acquisition order
    • Parametric clusters
  • The Bottleneck Hypothesis
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.10whi
References
Belikova, A.
(2008) Explicit instruction vs. linguistic competence in adult L2-acquisition. In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), BUCLD 32: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 48–59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Getting L2 reciprocal and reflexive verbs right. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). McGill University, Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruhn-Garavito, J.
(1995) L2 acquisition of verb complementation and binding principle B. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman, & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 79–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2013) What research can tell us about teaching: The case of pronouns and clitics. In M. Whong, K-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.
(2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2005) What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of the issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.
(1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–470.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D.
(1988) On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1–20.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J.
(1978) The verbal complex V’ – V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 151–175.Google Scholar
Felix, S., & Weigl. W.
(1991) Universal Grammar in the classroom: The effects of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 7, 162–180.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1982) From theory to practice. In M. Hines, & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL (pp. 129–139). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L.
(2008) Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 118, 577–594.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) Articles in Turkish/English interlanguage revisited: Implications of vowel harmony. In M. Garcia-Mayo, & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. (201–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y-K. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in L2 acquisition (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halloran, B., & Rothman, J.
(2015) The acquisition of clitics in L2 Spanish. In J. Smith, & T. Ibsane (Eds.), Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizaretta, M. L., & Maldonaldo, S.
(2008) Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554–576.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kizu, M.
(2013) L2 acquisition of null subjects in Japanese: A new generative perspective and its pedagogical implications. In M. Whong, K-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.). Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 35–55). Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1981) Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.
(1969) Transformational grammar and language teaching. Language Learning, 19, 117–140.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamendella, J.
(1969) On the irrelevance of transformational grammar to language pedagogy. Language Learning, 19, 255–270.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Goodluck, & H. Zobl (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 107–140). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2003) Teaching language. From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Lester, M.
(1970) Readings in applied transformational grammar. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.
(1993) Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46, 53–85.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R.
(2002) Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of preterite and imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In A. T. Perez-Leroux, & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1-L2 connection (pp. 113–149). Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Processability theory. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y.
(1989) Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Rankin, T.
(2013) Verb-movement in generative SLA and the teaching of word order patterns. In M. Whong, K-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 57–76). Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T., & Siloni, T.
(2005) The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 389–436.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D.
(1993) On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and “linguistic behavior”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Gubala-Ryzak, M.
(1992) Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research, 8, 1–38.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2002) The compounding parameter in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 507–540.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Is there a critical period for semantics? Second Language Research, 22, 302–338.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 280–294). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2013) What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In M. del Pilar García Mayo, J. Gutiérrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrían (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T., & Liskin-Gasparro, J.
(2015) Rumors of UG’s demise have been greatly exaggerated. Applied Linguistics, 36, 265–269.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W.
(2001) On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language, 77, 324–342.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, O.
(1965) Transformational grammar and the teacher of English. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart, Winston.Google Scholar
Trahey, M.
(1996) Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long term effects. Second Language Research, 12, 111–139.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M., & White, L.
(1993) Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, E., & McCormack, B.
(2013) The syntax-discourse interface and the interface between generative theory and pedagogical approaches to SLA. In M. Whong, K-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 101–116). Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(1985) The “pro-drop” parameter in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 35, 47–62.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133–161.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990/1991) The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1, 337–360.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 273–286.Google Scholar
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whong, M.
(2011) Language teaching: Linguistic theory in practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) A linguistic perspective on communicative language teaching. The Language Learning Journal, 41, 115–128.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whong, M., Gil, K-H., & Marsden, H.
(Eds.) (2013) Universal Grammar and the second language classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kume, Keisuke & Heather Marsden
2021. L2 acquisition of definiteness in Japanese floating numeral quantifiers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Munro, Murray J.
2021. On the Difficulty of Defining “Difficult” in Second-Language Vowel Acquisition. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Slabakova, Roumyana, Tania Leal, Amber Dudley & Micah Stack
2020. Generative Second Language Acquisition, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.