Cover not available
Part of
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. ix–xv

Introduction

Published online: 16 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.cho
References
Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I.
(2004) The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mykhaylyk, R., Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., & Westergaard, M.
(2015) The Linguistic Proximity Model: The case of Verb-Second revisited. In E. Grillo & K. Jepson (Eds.), BUCLD 39: Proceedings of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 337–349). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2010) On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48(2–3), 245–273.Google Scholar
(2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011 (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Judy, T., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P.
(2009) Noun-raising and adjectival interpretative reflexes in the L2 Spanish of Germanic and Italian learners. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD 33: Proceedings of the 33rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 444–455). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2013) What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(4), 543–559.Google Scholar
(2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) The Scalpel Model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T., & Liskin-Gasparro, J.
(2014) We have moved on: Current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 601–606.DOI logo.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
(2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682.Google Scholar
White, J., Muñoz, C., & Collins, L.
(2007) The his/her challenge: Making progress in a ‘regular’ L2 programme. Language Awareness, 16(4), 278–299.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(2000) Object language and the language subject: On the mediating role of applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 21–33.DOI logoGoogle Scholar