Chapter published in:
Bilingualism, Executive Function, and Beyond: Questions and insights
Edited by Irina A. Sekerina, Lauren Spradlin and Virginia Valian
[Studies in Bilingualism 57] 2019
► pp. 103116


Avivi-Reich, M., Bae, M. H., Kang, Y., & Schneider, B. A.
(2012) Listening to semantically anomalous sentences masked by noise and competing speech in a second language: A cross-language study on Korean-English bilinguals. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 28(1), 74–78.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G.
(2012) Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(4), 240–250. Crossref link
Bidelman, G. M., & Dexter, L.
(2015) Bilinguals at the “cocktail party”: Dissociable neural activity in auditory–linguistic brain regions reveals neurobiological basis for nonnative listeners’ speech-in-noise recognition deficits. Brain and Language, 143, 32–41. Crossref link
Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A.
(2007) Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339–2349. Crossref link
Brouwer, S., Van Engen, K. J., Calandruccio, L., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2012) Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: Language familiarity and semantic content. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1449–1464. Crossref link
Calandruccio, L., Brouwer, S., Van Engen, K. J., Dhar, S., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2013) Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech. American Journal of Audiology, 22(1), 157–164. Crossref link
Calandruccio, L., Dhar, S., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2010) Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(2), 860–869. Crossref link
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Swami, V., Terrado, A., & Furnham, A.
(2009) The effects of background auditory interference and extraversion on creative and cognitive task performance. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(2), 2. Crossref link
Cocchini, G., Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.
(2002) Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1086–1095. Crossref link
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
(1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407. Crossref link
Cooke, M., Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Barker, J.
(2008) The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 414–427. Crossref link
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113(2), 135–149.Crossref link
Cutler, A.
(2005) Why is it so hard to understand a second language in noise?. Newsletter, American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages, 48, 16–16.
Cutler, A., Weber, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N.
(2004) Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3668–3678. Crossref link
Dell, G. S.
(1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283. Crossref link
Ezzatian, P., Avivi, M., & Schneider, B. A.
(2010) Do nonnative listeners benefit as much as native listeners from spatial cues that release speech from masking? Speech Communication, 52(11), 919–929. Crossref link
Filippi, R., Leech, R., Thomas, M. S., Green, D. W., & Dick, F.
(2012) A bilingual advantage in controlling language interference during sentence comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 858–872. Crossref link
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A.
(2004) The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101. Crossref link
Glisky, E. L.
(2007) Changes in cognitive function in human aging. In D. R. Riddle (Ed.), Brain aging: Models, methods, and mechanisms (pp. 3–20). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.Crossref link
Golestani, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Obleser, J., & Scott, S. K.
(2013) Semantic versus perceptual interactions in neural processing of speech-in-noise. Neuroimage, 79, 52–61. Crossref link
Golumbic, E. M. Z., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., … & Poeppel, D.
(2013) Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron, 77(5), 980–991. Crossref link
Hervais-Adelman, A., Pefkou, M., & Golestani, N.
(2014) Bilingual speech-in-noise: Neural bases of semantic context use in the native language. Brain and language, 132, 1–6. Crossref link
Karns, C. M., Isbell, E., Giuliano, R. J., & Neville, H. J.
(2015) Auditory attention in childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study of spatial selective attention to one of two simultaneous stories. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 53–67. Crossref link
Krizman, J., Bradlow, A. R., Lam, S. S. Y., & Kraus, N.
(2017) How bilinguals listen in noise: Linguistic and non-linguistic factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 834–843. Crossref link
Leech, R., Aydelott, J., Symons, G., Carnevale, J., & Dick, F.
(2007) The development of sentence interpretation: Effects of perceptual, attentional and semantic interference. Developmental Science, 10(6), 794–813. Crossref link
Lucks Mendel, L., & Widner, H.
(2016) Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 55(2), 126–134. Crossref link
Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M.
(2009) Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 23–38. Crossref link
Marsh, J. E., Sörqvist, P., Hodgetts, H. M., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M.
(2015) Distraction control processes in free recall: Benefits and costs to performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 118. Crossref link
Marton, K., Eichorn, N., Campanelli, L., & Zakarias, L.
(2016) Working memory and interference control in children with Specific Language Impairment. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(5), 211–224. Crossref link
Mayo, L. H., Florentine, M., & Buus, S.
(1997) Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(3), 686–693. Crossref link
Melara, R. D., Rao, A., & Tong, Y.
(2002) The duality of selection: Excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 279. Crossref link
Mercier, J., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D.
(2016) The role of prior language context on bilingual spoken word processing: Evidence from the visual world task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 376–399. Crossref link
Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., & Wilcox, K. A.
(1999) Inhibition and aging: Similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 44. Crossref link
Neill, W. T.
(1977) Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 444. Crossref link
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B.
(2010) A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 13(2), 253–262.Crossref link
Rao, A., Zhang, Y., & Miller, S.
(2010) Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: An event-related potential study. Hearing Research, 268(1), 123–132. Crossref link
Rouleau, N., & Belleville, S.
(1996) Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51(6), P356–P363. Crossref link
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A.
(1982) Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 150–164. Crossref link>
Sarter, M., Givens, B., & Bruno, J. P.
(2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: Where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Research Reviews, 35(2), 146–160. Crossref link
Shi, L.-F.
(2011) How “proficient” is proficient? Subjective proficiency measure as a predictor of bilingual listeners’ recognition of English words. American Journal of Audiology, 19, 19–32. Crossref link
(2013) How “proficient” is proficient? Comparison of English and relative proficiency rating as a predictor of bilingual listeners’ word recognition. American Journal of Audiology, 21, 40–52. Crossref link
Shi, L. F.
(2015) How “proficient” is proficient? Bilingual listeners’ recognition of English words in noise. American Journal of Audiology, 24(1), 53–65. Crossref link>
Sorqvist, P., & Ronnberg, J.
(2012) Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by Speech: What is the role for working memory capacity? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55(1), 210–218. Crossref link
Soveri, A., Laine, M., Hämäläinen, H., & Hugdahl, K.
(2011) Bilingual advantage in attentional control: Evidence from the forced-attention dichotic listening paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 371–378. Crossref link
Turner, M. L., Johnson, S. K., McNamara, D. S., & Engle, R. W.
(1992) Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information. The Journal of General Psychology, 119(3), 247–263. Crossref link
Wood, S., Hiscock, M., & Widrig, M.
(2000) Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: Evidence that the lag effect is preattentional. Brain and Language, 71(3), 373–390. Crossref link
Wu, S., & Ma, Z.
(2016) Suppression and working memory in auditory comprehension of L2 narratives: Evidence from cross-modal priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(5), 1115–1135. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Guediche, Sara, Martijn Baart & Arthur G. Samuel
2020. Semantic priming effects can be modulated by crosslinguistic interactions during second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.