Chapter published in:Lost in Transmission: The role of attrition and input in heritage language development
Edited by Bernhard Brehmer and Jeanine Treffers-Daller
[Studies in Bilingualism 59] 2020
► pp. 71–98
Not in the mood
Frequency effects in heritage speakers’ subjunctive knowledge
Previous studies (e.g., van Osch & Sleeman 2016; Perez-Cortes 2016) have found that heritage speakers (HSs) of Spanish produce less lexically-selected subjunctive mood morphology than Spanish-dominant speakers. It remains unclear, however, whether the HSs’ tendency to produce less subjunctive mood than Spanish-dominant speakers is attributable to representational differences (e.g., Montrul 2002, 2008), input quality differences (e.g., Pires & Rothman 2009; Pascual y Cabo & Rothman 2012), or as yet unidentified factors. The present study addresses this question by testing the effect of lexical frequency on advanced proficiency HSs’ productive (Experiment 1) and receptive (Experiment 2) knowledge of lexically-selected subjunctive mood in Spanish. Results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that advanced proficiency HSs are both (a) highly accurate with subjunctive mood and yet also (b) significantly less accurate with lower frequency verbs. Given these findings, as well as the categorical subjunctive production of the Spanish-dominant bilingual control group, it is argued that HSs’ differences from dominant speakers may be (partially) attributable to gaps in lexical, rather than morphosyntactic knowledge.
- 2.Lexically-subjunctive mood: Syntax and acquisition
- 2.1Intensional subjunctive mood: Morphology and syntax
- 2.2Acquisition of subjunctive mood by Spanish native speakers
- 3.Experiment 1: HSs’ production of intensional subjunctive mood forms
- 3.3Experimental task
- 3.4Results and statistical analysis
- 3.5Discussion of Experiment 1
- 4.Experiment 2: HSs’ acceptance of intensional subjunctive mood forms
- 4.3Experimental task
- 4.4Results and statistical analysis
- 4.5Discussion of Experiment 2
- 5.Discussion and relevance of the findings
- 5.1Summary of results
- 5.2Implications for HL acquisition research
Published online: 29 May 2020
Borgonovo, C., Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Prévost, P.
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
Duffield, N. & White, L.
Kupisch, T. & Rothman, J.
Leal-Méndez, T., Rothman, J. & Slabakova, R.
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I. & Foote, R.
Montrul, S. & Perpiñán, S.
Montrul, S. & Sánchez-Walker, N.
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R.
van Osch, B. & Sleeman, P.
Pascual y Cabo, D. & Gómez Soler, I.
Pascual y Cabo, D. & Rothman, J.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T.
Pires, A. & Rothman, J.
Poplack, S., Lealess, A. & Dion, N.
Prévost, P. & White, L.
Putnam, M. & Sánchez, L.
Cited by 2 other publications
Giancaspro, David, Silvia Perez‐Cortes & Josh Higdon
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.