Cover not available
Part of
Lost in Transmission: The role of attrition and input in heritage language development
Edited by Bernhard Brehmer and Jeanine Treffers-Daller
[Studies in Bilingualism 59] 2020
► pp. 71–98

Not in the mood

Frequency effects in heritage speakers’ subjunctive knowledge

 | University of Richmond
Previous studies (e.g., van Osch & Sleeman 2016; Perez-Cortes 2016) have found that heritage speakers (HSs) of Spanish produce less lexically-selected subjunctive mood morphology than Spanish-dominant speakers. It remains unclear, however, whether the HSs’ tendency to produce less subjunctive mood than Spanish-dominant speakers is attributable to representational differences (e.g., Montrul 2002, 2008), input quality differences (e.g., Pires & Rothman 2009; Pascual y Cabo & Rothman 2012), or as yet unidentified factors. The present study addresses this question by testing the effect of lexical frequency on advanced proficiency HSs’ productive (Experiment 1) and receptive (Experiment 2) knowledge of lexically-selected subjunctive mood in Spanish. Results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that advanced proficiency HSs are both (a) highly accurate with subjunctive mood and yet also (b) significantly less accurate with lower frequency verbs. Given these findings, as well as the categorical subjunctive production of the Spanish-dominant bilingual control group, it is argued that HSs’ differences from dominant speakers may be (partially) attributable to gaps in lexical, rather than morphosyntactic knowledge.
Keywords: heritage speakers, subjunctive mood, variability, frequency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Lexically-subjunctive mood: Syntax and acquisition
    • 2.1Intensional subjunctive mood: Morphology and syntax
    • 2.2Acquisition of subjunctive mood by Spanish native speakers
  • 3.Experiment 1: HSs’ production of intensional subjunctive mood forms
    • 3.1Introduction
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Experimental task
    • 3.4Results and statistical analysis
    • 3.5Discussion of Experiment 1
  • 4.Experiment 2: HSs’ acceptance of intensional subjunctive mood forms
    • 4.1Introduction
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Experimental task
    • 4.4Results and statistical analysis
    • 4.5Discussion of Experiment 2
  • 5.Discussion and relevance of the findings
    • 5.1Summary of results
    • 5.2Implications for HL acquisition research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.59.03gia
References (43)
References
Blake, R. 1983. Mood selection among Spanish-speaking children, ages 4 to 12. The Bilingual Review 10: 21–32.Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C., Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Prévost, P. 2015. Mood selection in relative clauses: Interfaces and variability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37: 33–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. 2012. Mood: Indicative vs. subjunctive. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, J. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (eds), 371–394. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. 2002. Verb raising in Spanish: A comparison of early and late bilinguals. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), B. Skarabela, S. Fish & A. Do (eds), 84–94. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2006. A Frequency Dictionary of Spanish: Core Vocabulary for Learners. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. 1981. Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N. & White, L. 1999. Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: convergent methodologies. Second Language Research 15: 133–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durlak, J. 2009. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 34(9): 917–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. 1989. Lexical innovation and loss: The use and value of restricted Hungarian. In Investigating Obsolescence, N. Dorian (ed), 313–331. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. 2009. What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119: 1788–1810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. & Rothman, J. 2018. Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 564–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2005. On morphological competence. In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), L. Dekydspotter, R. Sprouse & A. Liljestrand (eds), 178–192. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Leal-Méndez, T., Rothman, J. & Slabakova, R. 2015. Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. Lingua 155: 85–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Ornat, S. 1994. La adquisición de la lengua española. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. 2008. Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research 24(4): 459–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2002. Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(1): 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor [Studies in Bilingualism 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 239–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I. & Foote, R. 2014. Early language experience facilitates gender agreement processing in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1): 118–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Perpiñán, S. 2011. Assessing differences and similarities between instructed heritage language learners and L2 learners in their knowledge of Spanish tense-aspect and mood (TAM) morphology. Heritage Language Journal 8(1): 90–133.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Sánchez-Walker, N. 2013. Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition 20(2): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. 2003. Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 351–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Osch, B. & Sleeman, P. 2018. Spanish heritage speakers in the Netherlands: Linguistic patterns in the judgment and production of mood. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 513–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D. & Gómez Soler, I. 2015. Preposition stranding in Spanish as a heritage language. Heritage Language Journal 12(2): 186–209.Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D. & Rothman, J. 2012. The (Il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics 33(4): 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez-Cortes, S. 2016. Acquiring Obligatory and Variable Mood Selection: Spanish Heritage Speakers’ and L2 Learners’ Performance in Desideratives and Reported Speech Contexts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. 1993. Empty Categories and the Acquisition of wh- Movement. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
1998. The acquisition of mood selection in Spanish relative clauses. Journal of Child Language 25(3): 585–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A. & Rothman, J. 2009. Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2006. Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14(2): 191–262.Google Scholar
2016. Looking ahead. In Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language [Studies in Bilingualism 49], D. Pascual y Cabo (ed.), 325–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Lealess, A. & Dion, N. 2013. The evolving grammar of the French subjunctive. Probus 25(1): 139–195.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. & Sánchez, L. 2013. What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegemenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4): 476–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, J. 2001. Interpreting mood. Probus 13: 81–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Subjunctives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 660–684. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, L. Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, aspect, and agreement in heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do receptive bilinguals understand functional morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1): 30–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 2014. Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

López Otero, Julio César, Esther Hur & Michele Goldin
2024. Syntactic optionality in heritage Spanish: How patterns of exposure and use affect clitic climbing. International Journal of Bilingualism 28:3 ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Dracos, Melisa & Pablo E. Requena
2023. Child heritage speakers’ acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive in volitional and adverbial clauses. Language Acquisition 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Perez-Cortes, Silvia
2023. Re-examining the role of mood selection type in Spanish heritage speakers’ subjunctive production. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:2 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2023. Frequency matters in second language acquisition too! Frequency effects in the production of preterit morphology with state verbs in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Lingua 295 ► pp. 103611 ff. DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2024. School, age, and exposure effects in the child heritage language acquisition of the Spanish volitional subjunctive. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2024. Frequency effects and aspect morphology with state verbs in heritage Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:5 ► pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
Giancaspro, David, Silvia Perez‐Cortes & Josh Higdon
2022. (Ir)regular Mood Swings: Lexical Variability in Heritage Speakers’ Oral Production of Subjunctive Mood. Language Learning 72:2 ► pp. 456 ff. DOI logo
Perez-Cortes, Silvia & David Giancaspro
2022. (In)frequently asked questions: On types of frequency and their role(s) in heritage language variability. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.