Marit Westergaard | The Arctic University of Norway | Norwegian University of Science and Technology
This study investigates two word order phenomena in Norwegian heritage language spoken in the US, subject shift (SS) and object shift (OS). SS and OS occur in syntactic environments where (pronominal) subjects and objects may either precede or follow negation. This paper explores to what extent these two phenomena in Heritage Norwegian are affected by the factors frequency and structural similarity/difference. As subjects are frequently shifted, while objects are not, SS is expected to be robust and OS vulnerable. There is generally no structural overlap between English and Norwegian in these cases; thus, cross-linguistic similarity or difference should not play a role, except in one context: questions with auxiliaries or be, in which the two languages allow both orders (is he not/isn’t he), but have opposite preferences. The results show that OS is somewhat vulnerable, but SS is also affected, in that both proficient and less proficient speakers seem to overuse the word order preferred in English. We thus speculate that all heritage speakers may be affected by cross-linguistic influence in situations with complete structural overlap.
2012Norwegian object shift as IP-internal topicalization. Nordlyd 39.1: The Grammar of Objects, 1–23.
Anderssen, M. & Westergaard, M.
2010Frequency and economy in the acquisition of variable word order. Lingua 120: 2569–2588.
Anderssen, M., Lundquist, B. & Westergaard, M.
2018Cross-linguistic similarities and differences in bilingual acquisition and attrition: Possessives and double definiteness in Norwegian heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(4): 748–764.
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K. & Rodina, Y.
2012Topicality and complexity in the acquisition of Norwegian object shift. Language Acquisition 19(1): 39–72.
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K., Rodina, Y. & Westergaard, M.
2010The acquisition of apparent optionality: The word order of subject and object shift constructions in Norwegian. In Variation in the Input: Studies in the Acquisition of Word Order, M. Anderssen, K. Bentzen & M. Westergaard (eds), 241–270. Dordrecht: Springer.
Anderssen, M., Rodina, Y., Mykhaylyk, R. & Fikkert, P.
2014The acquisition of the dative alternation in Norwegian. Language Acquisition 21: 72–102.
Anderssen, M.
2006The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Andréasson, M.
2008Not all objects are born alike – accessibility as a key to pronominal object shift in Swedish and Danish. In Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference, M. Butt & T. Halloway King (eds), 26–45. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Andréasson, M.
2010Object shift or object placement in general. In Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference, M. Butt & T. Halloway King (eds), 26–42. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Bentzen, K.
2009Subject positions and their interaction with verb movement. Studia Linguistica 63(3): 1–31.
Bentzen, K.
2014Object shift. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) 1: 332–343.
Bentzen, K., Anderssen, M. & Waldmann, Ch.
2013Object shift in Mainland Scandinavian: A corpus study of Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(2): 115–151.
Cardinaletti, A.
2004Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, L. Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.
Erteschik-Shir, N.
2005Sound patterns of syntax: Object shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31(1–2): 47–94.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J. & Veltkamp, E.
2004Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15(6): 409–414.
Haugen, E.
1953The Norwegian Language in America. A Study in Bilingual Behavior. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Holmberg, A.
1986Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Holmberg, A.
1999Remarks on Holmberg’s generalization. Studia Linguistica 53(1): 1–39.
Jayaseelan, K.
2001IP-internal topic and focus phrases. Studia Linguistica 55(1): 39–75.
Johannessen, J. B.
2015The Corpus of American Norwegian Speech (CANS). In Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, NODALIDA 2015, B. Megyesi (ed.), 297–300. Linköping: University Electronic Press.
Johannessen, J. B. & Laake, S.
2017Norwegian in the American Midwest: A common dialect?Journal of Language Contact 10: 5–21.
Johannessen, J. B. & Lake, S.
2012Østnorsk som fellesdialect i Midtvesten. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 30(2): 365–380.
2010Object shift and optionality: An intricate interplay between syntax, prosody and information structure. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86: 1–24.
van Kemenade, A. & Los, B.
2006Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, A. van Kemenade & B. Los (eds), 224–248. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Köpke, B. & Schmid, M.
2004Language attrition: The next phase. In First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues [Studies in Bilingualism 28], M. Schmid, B. Köpke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (eds), 1–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kupisch, T.
2013A new term for a better distinction? A view from the higher end of the proficiency scale. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4): 203–214.
Kupisch, T.
2014Adjective placement in simultaneous bilinguals (German-Italian) and the concept of cross-linguistic overcorrection. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1): 222–233.
Kupisch, T. & Rothman, J.
2018Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 564–582.
Lødrup, H.
2011Norwegian possessive pronouns: Phrases, words or suffixes? In Proceedings of the LFG11 Conference, M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds), 383–403. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Lohndal, T. & Westergaard, M.
2016Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: Stability or attrition?Frontiers in Psychology 7.344.
Lovoll, O. S.
1999The Promise of America: A History of the Norwegian-American People, revised edn. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Martin, C. D., Dering, B., Thomas, E. M. & Thierry, G.
2009Brain potentials reveal semantic priming in both the ‘active’ and the ‘non-attended’ language of early bilinguals. NeuroImage 47(1): 326–333.
Mikkelsen, L.
2011On prosody and focus in object shift. Syntax 14(3): 230–264.
2014Incomplete L1 acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 353–371. Cambridge: CUP.
Müller, N. & Hulk, A.
2001Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 1–21.
Nilsen, Ø.
1997Adverbs and A-shift. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 59: 1–31.
NoTa – Norsk Talespråkskorpus, Oslodelen
Corpus of Spoken Norwegian, the Oslo part], Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, University of Oslo.
Polinsky, M.
2006Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14: 191–262.
1992The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, J. Meisel (ed.), 23–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roeper, T.
1999Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3): 169–186.
Roeper, T.
2007What frequency can do and what it can’t. In Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept, I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (eds), 23–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z. & Polinsky, M.
2015Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1545.
Simonsen, H. G.
1990Barns fonologi: system og variasjon hos tre norske og et samoisk barn. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.
Snyder, W.
2007Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: OUP.
2007The (non-) effect of input frequency on the acquisition of word order in Norwegian embedded clauses. In Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept, I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (eds), 271–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Westergaard, M. & Lohndal, T.
2019Verb second word order in Norwegian heritage language: Syntax and pragmatics. In Variable Properties in Language: Their Nature and Acquisition, D. Lightfoot & J. Havenhill (eds). 91–102 Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. [URL].
van Lieburg, Rianne, Robert Hartsuiker & Sarah Bernolet
2023. The production preferences and priming effects of Dutch passives in Arabic/Berber–Dutch and Turkish–Dutch heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:4 ► pp. 695 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.