Part of
Studies in Turkish as a Heritage Language
Edited by Fatih Bayram
[Studies in Bilingualism 60] 2020
► pp. 18
References
Aalberse, S., Backus, A., & Muysken, P.
(2019) Heritage languages. A language contact approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bayram, F., Di Pisa, G., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
in press). Current trends and emerging methodologies in charting heritage language bilingual grammars. In S. A. Montrul & M. Polinksy Eds. The Cambridge handbook of heritage language Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Backus, A., Jørgensen, J. N., & Pfaff, C. W.
(2010) Linguistic effects of immigration: Language choice, codeswitching and change in Western European Turkish. LINCOM Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 481–495.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A.
(2008) Language ecology and language ideology. In A. Creese, P. Martin, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 9, Ecology of Language (2nd ed., pp. 27–40). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dorian, N.
(ed.) 1989Investigating obsolescence: studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doğruöz, S., & Backus, A.
(2009) Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: An assessment of ongoing contact-induced change. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 12(1), 41–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J.
(2001) 300 plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Raynard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 81–98). Washington, DC: Delta Systems & McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balciuniene, I., … & Walters, J.
(2012) Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN). ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 56, 1–140.Google Scholar
Haugen, E.
(1953) The Norwegian language in America. A study in bilingual behavior. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1972) The Ecology of Language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., & Wang, S. C.
(2008) Who are our heritage language learners? Identity and biliteracy in heritage language education in the United States. In D. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 3–35). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johanson, L.
(1993) Code-copying in immigrant Turkish. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Immigrant languages in Europe (pp. 197–221). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J.
(2018) Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–582.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2010) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics(2010),30, 3–23.Google Scholar
(2015) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W.
(2015) (How) will Turkish survive in Northwestern Europe? 50 years of migration, 35 years of research on sociopolitical and linguistic developments in diaspora Turkish. In D. Zeyrek, Ç. Sağın-Şimşek, U. Ataş, & J. Rehbein (Eds.), Ankara papers in Turkish and Turkic linguistics. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 453–492). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., Dollnick, M., & Herkenrath, A.
(2017) Classroom and community support for Turkish in Germany. In O. Kagan, M. Carreira, & C. Chik (Eds.), A handbook on heritage language education: From innovation to program building (pp. 423–437). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
(2007) Heritage language in the wild and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M.
2018Heritage Languages and their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G.
(2020) A roadmap for heritage language research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 50–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehbein, J., Herkenrath, A., & Karakoç, B.
(2009) Turkish in Germany – On contact induced language change of an immigrant language in the multilingual landscape of Europe. STUF Language Typology & Universals, 62(3), 171–204.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163.Google Scholar
Şımşek, Y & C. Schroeder
(2011) Migration und Sprache in Deutschland – am Beispiel der Migranten ausder Türkei und ihrer Kinder und Kindeskinder. In. Şeyda Ozil / Michael Hofmann / Yasemin Dayıoğlu-Yücel (Hg. ) 50 Jahre türkische Arbeitsmigration in Deutschland HYPERLINK[URL]” Türkisch-deutsche Studien. Jahrbuch.  - Jahrgang 2011, 205–228.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L.
(2020) What counts as the baseline in child heritage language acquisition? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 46–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G.
(2000) Teaching heritage languages: An introduction for Slavic-language-teaching professionals. In O. Kagan & B. Rifkin (Eds.), Learning and teaching of Slavic languages and cultures (pp. 375–403). Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Boeschoten, H.
(1986) First language acquisition in a second language environment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 241–255.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. J.
(1996) Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar