Edited by Ute Bohnacker and Natalia Gagarina
[Studies in Bilingualism 61] 2020
► pp. 149–170
Narrative comprehension in simultaneously bilingual Finnish-Swedish and monolingual Finnish children
We analysed narrative comprehension in 5-to-6-year-old simultaneously bilingual Finnish-Swedish (n = 16) and monolingual Finnish children (n = 16) by using the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN). We assessed mean total narrative comprehension scores for bilingual children in both of their languages and for monolingual children in Finnish, in both telling and retelling conditions. We compared bilingual and monolingual children’s narrative comprehension in Finnish and analysed the association between comprehension and production. We also analysed the children’s ability to answer different types of comprehension questions (i.e., questions probing goals, internal state terms, and questions requiring both the ability to draw inferences and to explain answers). We found no difference in total narrative comprehension scores for bilingual children between their two languages or between monolingual and bilingual children. This suggests language-independent narrative comprehension. We found no difference in narrative comprehension between telling and retelling and no correlation between narrative comprehension and production. However, we found a clear question type effect. Children performed better on questions probing goals or internal state terms, but questions that required both inferencing and ability to explain answers were very demanding. In conclusion, detailed analysis of narrative comprehension provides knowledge on how children create a coherent understanding of a story and utilise information in the comprehension process.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Procedure and design
- 2.3Statistical analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Narrative comprehension: Total score on comprehension questions
- 3.2Associations between narrative comprehension and production
- 3.3Children’s performance on the different comprehension questions
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Language comparison
- 4.2Group comparison
- 4.3Associations between narrative comprehension and production
- 4.4Task comparison
- 4.5Comprehension of different macrostructural components
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements -
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.61.05kun
References
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.