Chapter 6
Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish
A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006)
This study investigates the contextual constraint principle in input processing, which states that learners may rely less on a first-noun-as-subject/agent strategy if preceding context constrains the interpretation of a clause or sentence. Second language learners of Spanish (N = 39) completed a sentence interpretation task in which they heard OVS sentences in various context conditions: neutral versus constraining context appearing prior to and after OVS clauses. Results revealed greater accuracy on OVS sentence interpretation when constraining context was available, particularly when it appeared prior to the target OVS clause. The results suggest that first noun reliance is significantly weakened when constraining context is available, and that the contextual constraint principle should be expanded to include context in post target-clause position.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background: Contextual effects on sentence processing
- The current study
- Method
- Participants
- Experimental task
- Data collection
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Appendix
References (18)
Altmann, G., & Steedman, M.
(
1988)
Interaction with context during human sentence processing.
Cognition, 30, 191–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(
2006)
How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & Steedman, M.
(
1985)
On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax process. In
D. R. Dowty,
L. Kartunnen, &
A. M. Zwicky (Eds.),
Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspective (pp. 320–358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M.
(
1989)
How do learners resolve linguistic conflicts? In
S. M. Gass &
J. Schachter (Eds.),
Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 183–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Houston, T.
(
1997)
Sentence processing in Spanish as a second language: A study of word order and background knowledge. In
W. Glass &
A. T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.),
Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Volume 2: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 123–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malovrh, P.
(
2006)
L2 sentence processing of Spanish OVS word order and direct object pronouns: An analysis of contextual constraints. In
N. Sagarra, &
A. J. Toribio (Eds.),
Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 169–179). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murray, W., & Liversedge, S.
(
1994)
Referential context effects on syntactic processing. In
C. Clifton, Jr.,
L. Frazier, &
K. Rayner (Eds.),
Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 359–388). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, H.-Y., & Felser, C.
(
2011)
Referential context effects on L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading.
Lingua, 121, 221–236.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, H.-Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C.
(
2015)
Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution.
International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 298–313.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, L.
(
2012)
Psycholinguistic techniques and resources in second language acquisition research.
Second Language Research, 28, 113–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(
2006)
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian.
Second Language Research, 22, 239–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B.
(
1984)
Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word-order strategy.
Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57–67.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B.
(
1996)
Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B.
(
2004)
Input processing in second language acquisition. In
B. VanPatten (Ed.),
Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B.
(
2015)
Input processing in adult SLA. In
B. VanPatten &
J. Williams (Eds.),
Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B., & Houston, T.
(
1998)
Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences.
Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 53–70.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (
2015)
Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Casper, Rachel, Zenaida Aguirre-Muñoz, Michael Spivey & Heather Bortfeld
2024.
Spanish–English bilingual heritage speakers processing of inanimate sentences.
Frontiers in Language Sciences 3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.