Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Gender: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Studies in Bilingualism 63] 2022
► pp. 127–156

Chapter 6
Grammatical gender and article use in beginning learners of German

| University of Arizona

Acquiring nouns’ grammatical gender, corresponding articles, and their morphological variants is one of the biggest challenges for adult learners of German. In this study, we analyze determiner noun phrases (NPs) produced orally by Spanish L1/English L2 beginning learners of German L3. We explore the extent to which L3 learners correctly produce determiner NPs including the appropriately marked grammatical gender, the extent to which they have become sensitive to nouns’ formal gender cues, and the factors that help them cope with the complexity of the German article and gender systems. We pay special attention to the possibility of cross-linguistic influence (CLI) in L3 learners’ article/gender choices according to predictions made by the Parasitic Model of vocabulary acquisition. The results suggest that learners reduce the complexity of the article/gender selection task by resorting to CLI, the adoption of gender from assumed lexical equivalents, and by over-using the most frequent forms (ein-masc/neu and die-fem) which also are the phonologically least complex and most similar forms to equivalents in the L1 and/or L2. Formal gender cues only have a limited effect on article choice for the learners at this early stage of acquisition. Sensitivity to gender cues emerges only for the most frequent cue types and in association with definite (not indefinite) article use.

Keywords: articles, grammatical gender, errors, German, second language, third language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Grammatical gender and articles in German
  • 3.The acquisition and processing of gender and articles in German L2/L3
    • 3.1Gender processing in advanced learners of German
    • 3.2Gender processing in beginning learners of German
    • 3.3The Parasitic Model and gender transfer
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Research questions
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Tasks and procedure
    • 4.4Statistical analyses
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Gender and indefinite article use
    • 5.2Gender and definite article use
    • 5.3Learners’ sensitivity to gender cues
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Accuracy of article use and sensitivity to gender cues
    • 6.2CLI and other factors affecting article use and gender assignment
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 20 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.63.06eck
References
Ayoun, D.
(2007) The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and agreement. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), French applied linguistics (pp. 130–170). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Grammatical gender assignment in French: Dispelling the native speaker myth. Journal of French Language Studies, 28, 113–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
(2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition. The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baten, K., & Lochtman, K.
(2014) Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick. Muttersprache, 124(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Opitz, A., & Pechmann, T.
(2006) Gender processing in first and second languages: The role of noun termination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1090–1101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T.
(2007) Factors influencing L2 gender processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 299–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.
(1987) Constraints on codeswitching: How universal are they? Linguistics, 25, 739–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
(1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpora Collection Leipzig University
(2018) German news corpus based on material crawled in 2018 with 46,843,422 sentences. Retrieved on 10 June 2021 from: [URL]
Delisle, H.
(1985) The acquisition of gender by American students of German. The Modern Language Journal, 69(1): 55–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Albrecht, H., & Zoch, I.
(1991) Lernerstrategien im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Untersuchungen zum Erwerb des deutschen Deklinationssystems. De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Christen, H., Leuenberger, S., Pelvat, I., & Studer, T.
(2000) Grammatikunterricht: alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Duden
(2021) Die Verteilung der Artikel (Genusangaben) im Rechtschreibduden. Retrieved on 10 June 2021 from [URL]
Ecke, P.
(2015) Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J.
(2000) Lexikalische Fehler in Deutsch als Drittsprache: Translexikalischer Einfluss auf drei Ebenen der mentalen Repräsentation. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 37(1), 30–36.Google Scholar
(2014) The Parasitic Model of L2 and L3 vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from naturalistic and experimental studies. Fórum Linguístico, 11(3), 360–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grauberg, W.
(1971) An error analysis in German of first-year university students. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (Eds), Applications of linguistics (pp. 257–263). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J.
(2002) The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 40(2), 69–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Ecke, P.
(2003) Parasitism as a default mechanism in L3 vocabulary acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner (Eds), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 71–85). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., Newbrand, D., Ecke, P., Sperr, U., Marchand, V., & Hayes, L.
(2009) Learners’ implicit assumptions about syntactic frames in new L3 words: The role of cognates, typological proximity, and L2 status. Language Learning, 59(1), 153–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Reyes Duran, A.
(2009) Cross-linguistic influence in L2 verb frames: The effects of word familiarity and language proficiency. In A. G. Benati (Ed.), Issues in language proficiency (pp. 24–44). Continuum.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Schultz, M.
(1994) Los errores de marco sintáctico: Evidencia del modelo parasitario del léxico mental en un segundo idioma. Estudios en Lingüística Aplicada, Memorias del II Congreso Nacional de Lingüística (pp. 376–389). UNAM, INAH and ECM.Google Scholar
Hohlfeld, A.
(2004) Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 127–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N.
(2007) The use and non-use of semantic information, word order, and case markings during comprehension by L2 learners of German. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaensch, C.
(2009) Article choice and article omission in the L3 German of native speakers of Japanese with L2 English. In M. del P. García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 233–263). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B.
(1998) The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 543–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M.
(1982) Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. A.
(1983) Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 11(2), 166–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D.
(1984) Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.Google Scholar
Kraiss, A.
(2014) Taking the awful out of the German language: A study of a new way to teach German gender and plural assignment. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 47(1), 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Hanique, I.
(2010) Native language effects in learning second-language grammatical gender: A training study. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 150–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H.
(2008) Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 312–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levine, G.
(1999) Gender assignment to German nonsense nouns: What does the native speaker know that the non-native speaker doesn’t? In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 397–406). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1978) The acquisition of morphophonology. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R.
(1984) Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menzel, B.
(2003) Genuserwerb im DaF-Unterricht. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 40(4), 233–237.Google Scholar
Menzel, B., & Tamaoka, K.
(1995) Der? Die?? Das??? Genuszuweisung bei Anfängern: Zufall, Pauken oder Strategie. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 1, 12–22.Google Scholar
Mills, A. E.
(1986) The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W.
(1984) On input and residual L1 transfer effects in Turkish and Greek children’s German. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 271–298). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N.
(2014) Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 709–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritterbusch, R., LaFond, L., & Agustin, M.
(2006) Learner difficulties with German case: Implications from an action research study. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 39, 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M.
(1987) Learners’ difficulties with grammatical gender in German as a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 48–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2): 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N.
(2007) The representation of grammatical gender in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from Greek and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 257–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomoglou, P.
(2007) Mutterspracheinfluss beim Genuserwerb: Beobachtungen an griechischen Lernern des Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 44(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Borst, S.
(2012) The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in processing instruction: Nominative-accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 92–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F.
(1997) Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8(4), 314–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, D., & MacWhinney, B.
(2015) US German majors’ knowledge of grammatical gender. Die Unterrichtspraxis: Teaching German, 48(1), 25–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. R., & van Compernolle, R. A.
(2017) Teaching German declension as meaning: A concept-based approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 68–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, H.
(1999) German gender in children’s second language acquisition. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds), Gender in Grammar and Cognition (pp. 511–544). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B.
(1998) Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Długosz, Kamil
2023. Processing gender agreement in an additional language: The more languages the better?. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 997 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.