Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Gender: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Studies in Bilingualism 63] 2022
► pp. 127156
Ayoun, D.
(2007) The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and agreement. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), French applied linguistics (pp. 130–170). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Grammatical gender assignment in French: Dispelling the native speaker myth. Journal of French Language Studies, 28, 113–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
(2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition. The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baten, K.
(2013) The acquisition of the German case system by foreign language learners. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baten, K., & Lochtman, K.
(2014) Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick. Muttersprache, 124(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Opitz, A., & Pechmann, T.
(2006) Gender processing in first and second languages: The role of noun termination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1090–1101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T.
(2007) Factors influencing L2 gender processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 299–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.
(1987) Constraints on codeswitching: How universal are they? Linguistics, 25, 739–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
(1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corpora Collection Leipzig University
(2018) German news corpus based on material crawled in 2018 with 46,843,422 sentences. Retrieved on 10 June 2021 from: https://​corpora​.uni​-leipzig​.de​/en​?corpusId​=deu​_newscrawl​-public​_2018​&word=
Delisle, H.
(1985) The acquisition of gender by American students of German. The Modern Language Journal, 69(1): 55–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Albrecht, H., & Zoch, I.
(1991) Lernerstrategien im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Untersuchungen zum Erwerb des deutschen Deklinationssystems. De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Christen, H., Leuenberger, S., Pelvat, I., & Studer, T.
(2000) Grammatikunterricht: alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(2021) Die Verteilung der Artikel (Genusangaben) im Rechtschreibduden. Retrieved on 10 June 2021 from https://​www​.duden​.de​/sprachwissen​/sprachratgeber​/Die​-Verteilung​-der​-Artikel​-Genusangabe​-im​-Rechtschreibduden
Ecke, P.
(2015) Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 145–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J.
(2000) Lexikalische Fehler in Deutsch als Drittsprache: Translexikalischer Einfluss auf drei Ebenen der mentalen Repräsentation. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 37(1), 30–36.Google Scholar
(2014) The Parasitic Model of L2 and L3 vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from naturalistic and experimental studies. Fórum Linguístico, 11(3), 360–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grauberg, W.
(1971) An error analysis in German of first-year university students. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (Eds), Applications of linguistics (pp. 257–263). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J.
(2002) The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 40(2), 69–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Ecke, P.
(2003) Parasitism as a default mechanism in L3 vocabulary acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner (Eds), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 71–85). Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., Newbrand, D., Ecke, P., Sperr, U., Marchand, V., & Hayes, L.
(2009) Learners’ implicit assumptions about syntactic frames in new L3 words: The role of cognates, typological proximity, and L2 status. Language Learning, 59(1), 153–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Reyes Duran, A.
(2009) Cross-linguistic influence in L2 verb frames: The effects of word familiarity and language proficiency. In A. G. Benati (Ed.), Issues in language proficiency (pp. 24–44). Continuum.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J., & Schultz, M.
(1994) Los errores de marco sintáctico: Evidencia del modelo parasitario del léxico mental en un segundo idioma. Estudios en Lingüística Aplicada, Memorias del II Congreso Nacional de Lingüística (pp. 376–389). UNAM, INAH and ECM.Google Scholar
Hohlfeld, A.
(2004) Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 127–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N.
(2007) The use and non-use of semantic information, word order, and case markings during comprehension by L2 learners of German. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaensch, C.
(2009) Article choice and article omission in the L3 German of native speakers of Japanese with L2 English. In M. del P. García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 233–263). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B.
(1998) The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 543–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M.
(1982) Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. A.
(1983) Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 11(2), 166–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D.
(1984) Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.Google Scholar
Kraiss, A.
(2014) Taking the awful out of the German language: A study of a new way to teach German gender and plural assignment. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 47(1), 23–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Hanique, I.
(2010) Native language effects in learning second-language grammatical gender: A training study. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 150–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H.
(2008) Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 312–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levine, G.
(1999) Gender assignment to German nonsense nouns: What does the native speaker know that the non-native speaker doesn’t? In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 397–406). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1978) The acquisition of morphophonology. University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R.
(1984) Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, B.
(2003) Genuserwerb im DaF-Unterricht. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 40(4), 233–237.Google Scholar
Menzel, B., & Tamaoka, K.
(1995) Der? Die?? Das??? Genuszuweisung bei Anfängern: Zufall, Pauken oder Strategie. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 1, 12–22.Google Scholar
Mills, A. E.
(1986) The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W.
(1984) On input and residual L1 transfer effects in Turkish and Greek children’s German. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 271–298). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N.
(2014) Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 709–737. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritterbusch, R., LaFond, L., & Agustin, M.
(2006) Learner difficulties with German case: Implications from an action research study. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 39, 30–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M.
(1987) Learners’ difficulties with grammatical gender in German as a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 48–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2): 179–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N.
(2007) The representation of grammatical gender in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from Greek and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 257–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomoglou, P.
(2007) Mutterspracheinfluss beim Genuserwerb: Beobachtungen an griechischen Lernern des Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 44(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Borst, S.
(2012) The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in processing instruction: Nominative-accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 92–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F.
(1997) Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8(4), 314–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, D., & MacWhinney, B.
(2015) US German majors’ knowledge of grammatical gender. Die Unterrichtspraxis: Teaching German, 48(1), 25–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. R., & van Compernolle, R. A.
(2017) Teaching German declension as meaning: A concept-based approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 68–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, H.
(1999) German gender in children’s second language acquisition. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds), Gender in Grammar and Cognition (pp. 511–544). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B.
(1998) Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar