Grammatical mapping in L3 acquisition
A theory of development
In this chapter, we focus on the question of how
development may take place in multilingual (L3) acquisition and
the role of prior knowledge in this process. The theoretical paradigm
called Grammatical Mapping (GM) (Lust, 2012 for L1
acquisition) supposes an active, albeit unconscious, creative
involvement of the learner in the construction of the specific language
grammar constrained and guided by Universal Grammar
(UG). We propose that the GM paradigm provides a valid and
principled account of the process of multilingual acquisition as
well. By means of presenting concrete examples from our previous
experimental research, we will illustrate how the three essential
predictions deriving from this paradigm also bear out in the
multilingual scenario. Similar to L1 acquisition, UG’s structure-dependent and invariant principle(s) are
shown to be at work in multilingual
development. Moreover, based on error analyses of
multilingual learners’ errors and
reformations in elicited productions, we present
tangible indications that multilingual learners draw upon previously
known language grammars while engaged in linguistic computation –
analysis, dissociation and integration – of target language-specific
components. Our contribution to the GM paradigm is
the specification of the manner in which multilingual learners draw
upon previous knowledge in the construction of new target grammar,
thus extricating explicit from implicit linguistic knowledge. We
expect that the application of this paradigm onto multilingual
experimental data may shed light on the degree to which
domain-specific innate principles guide and constrain language
acquisition in general.
Keywords: complementizer phrase, cross-linguistic influence, error analysis, error reformations, grammatical mapping, initial state, multilingual development, paradigm, structure-dependence, transfer, universal grammar
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Toward a comprehensive theory of language acquisition
- 3.Grammatical mapping (GM) (Lust, 2012)
- 3.1GM for multilingual acquisition: What constitutes the initial
state
- 3.2GM for multilingual acquisition: What constitutes development and the role of previous
linguistic experience
- 3.3GM for multilingual acquisition: Empirical predictions
- 4.Discussion of supporting evidence
- 5.Final remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (56)
Amaral, L., & Roeper, T.
(
2014)
Multiple
grammars and second language
representation.
Second
Language
Research,
30(1), 3–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A.
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(
2012b)
Free
relatives as a key to the mapping of grammatical
functions. Paper presented at
the EuroSLA22, Poznań,
Poland.
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(
2013)
Multilingualism:
New perspectives on syntactic
development. In
W. C. Ritchie &
T. K. Bhatia (Eds.),
Handbook
of bilingualism and
multilingualism (2nd
ed., pp. 137–167). John Wiley & Sons.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(
2015)
Multilingual
acquisition of English: Development of grammar through study
of null
anaphora. In
M. P. Safont Jordà &
L. Portolés Falomir (Eds.),
Learning
and using multiple languages: Current findings from research
on
multilingualism (pp. 112–133). Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(
2016)
Multi-competence
and
syntax. In
V. Cook &
L. Wei (Eds.),
Handbook
of linguistic
multi-competence (pp. 206–226). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berwick, R., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., & Chomsky, N.
(
2011)
Poverty
of the stimulus
revisited.
Cognitive
Science,
35, 1207–1242.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boser, K., Lust, B., Santelmann, L., & Whitman, J.
(
1992)
The
syntax of CP and V-2 in early German child grammar: The
Strong Continuity
Hypothesis.
North East
Linguistics Society,
Vol.
22(1),
Article
5.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caponigro, I.
(
2002)
Free
relatives as DPs with a silent D and a CP
complement. In
V. Samiian (Ed.),
Proceedings
of WECOL
2000 (pp. 140–150). California State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1971)
Problems
of knowledge and
freedom. Pantheon Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1980)
Rules
and
representations. Columbia University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1981)
Lectures
on government and binding. The Pisa
lectures. Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1995)
The
minimalist program. The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
2016)
Minimal
computation and the architecture of
language.
Chinese Semiotic
Studies,
12(1), 13–24.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, V., & Newson, M.
(
2007)
Chomsky’s
Universal Grammar: An
introduction (3rd
ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & Nakayama, M.
(
1987)
Structure
dependence in grammar
formation.
Language,
63(3), 522–543.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
(
2005)
A
new look at the acquisition of relative
clauses.
Language,
81, 1–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
(
1996)
Second
language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in
contemporary
research.
Behavioural and
Brain
Sciences,
1, 677–758.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(
2020)
Where
DLC meets multilingual syntactic
development. In
J. Lo Bianco &
L. Aronin (Eds.),
Dominant
language constellations: A new perspective on
multilingualism (pp. 57–74). Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
Flynn, S.
(
1983)
A
study of the effects of principal branching direction in
second language acquisition: The generalization of a
parameter of Universal Grammar from first to second language
acquisition (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Cornell University.
Flynn, S.
(
1987)
A
parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: Experimental
studies in
anaphora. Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S.
(
1989)
Spanish,
Japanese and Chinese speakers’ acquisition of English
relative clauses: New evidence for the head-direction
parameter. In
K. Hyltenstam &
L. K. Obler (Eds.),
Bilingualism
across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and
loss (pp. 116–131). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S.
(
2019)
Foreword. In
M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado,
M. Martínez-Adrián, &
F. Gallardo-del-Puerto (Eds.),
Cross-linguistic
influence: from empirical evidence to classroom
practice (pp. vii–xiv). Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S.
(
2021)
Microvariation
in multilingual situations: The importance of
property-by-property acquisition: Pros and
cons.
Second Language
Research,
37(3), 481–488.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., & Foley, C.
(
2004)
On
the developmental primacy of free
relatives. In
A. Csirmaz,
A. Gualmini, &
A. Nevin (Eds.),
Plato’s
Problems: Papers on Language
Acquisition (pp. 59–69). MITWPL.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
(
2004)
The
Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition:
Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of
development.
International
Journal of
Multilingualism,
1(1), 3–17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., & Lust, B.
(
1980)
Acquisition
of relative clauses in English: Developmental changes in
their
heads. In
W. Harbert &
J. Herschensohn (Eds.),
Cornell
Working Papers in
Linguistics 1 (pp. 33–42). Cornell University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., & Lust, B.
(
2002)
A
minimalist approach to L2 solves a dilemma of
UG. In
V. Cook (Ed.),
Portraits
of the L2
user (pp. 95–120). Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., & O’Neil, W.
(Eds.) (
1988)
Linguistic
theory in second language
acquisition. Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flynn, S., Vinnitskaya, I. & Foley, C.
(
2008)
Complementizer phrase features in child L1 and adult L3 acquisition. In
The Role of Features in Second Language Acquisition.
J. M. Liceras,
H. Zobl &
H. Goodluck (eds). 519–533. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, C.
(
1996)
Knowledge
of the syntax of operators in the initial state: The
acquisition of relative clauses in French and
English (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Cornell University.
Fries, C. C.
(
1945)
Teaching
and learning English as a foreign
language. University of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gair, J., Flynn, S., & Brown, O.
(
1997)
Why
Japanese object to L2
objects. In
S. Somashekar,
K. Yamakoshi,
M. Blume, &
C. Foley (Eds.),
Cornell
University Working Papers in
Linguistics 15 (pp. 101–111). Cornell University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, M. T.
(
2009)
Universal
Grammar approaches to language
acquisition. In
S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.),
Language
Acquisition (pp. 87–108). Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamburger, H.
(
1980)
A
deletion ahead of its
time.
Cognition,
8, 389–416.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Tecumseh, F. W.
(
2002)
The
faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it
evolve? Science,
298, 1569–1579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lado, R.
(
1957)
Linguistics
across cultures. University of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, K.-O.
(
1991)
On
the first language acquisition of relative clauses in
Korean: The universal structure of
COMP (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Cornell University.
Lust, B.
(
2006)
Child
language: Acquisition and
growth. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B.
(
2010)
Directionality
in the architecture of the language faculty: Integrating
with real
time. In
H. Yamashita,
Y. Hirose, &
J. Packard (Eds.),
Processing
and producing head-final
structures. Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B.
(
2012)
Tracking
universals requires grammatical
mapping. In
K. K. Grohmann &
A. Shelkovaya (Eds.),
Linguists
of tomorrow: Selected papers from the 1st Cyprus
Postgraduate Student Conference in Theoretical and Applied
Linguistics (pp. 105–130). Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B., Solan, L., Flynn, S., Cross, C., & Schuetz, E.
(
1986)
A
comparison of null and pronoun anaphora in first language
acquisition. In
B. Lust (Ed.),
Studies
in the Acquisiton of
Anaphora (Vol. I, pp. 245–277). Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michigan English
Placement Test
c.f.©
(
2018)
Cambridge
Michigan Language Assessments.
[URL]
Mróz, M.
(
2010)
Bilingual
language acquisition: Focus on relative clauses in Polish
and English. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murasugi, K.
(
1991)
Noun
phrases in Japanese and English: A study in syntax,
learnability and
acquisition (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). University of Connecticut.
Packard, J. L.
(
1988)
The
first language acquisition of prenominal modification with
de in Mandarin.
Journal of
Chinese
Linguistics,
16(1), 31–53.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J.
(
2020)
A
systematic review of transfer studies in third language
acquisition.
Second Language
Research,
36(1), 31–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.
(
2005)
Uncovering
the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and
indirect statistical
evidence.
Cognitive
Science,
29, 1007–1028.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothman, J.
(
2010)
L3
syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy:
The Typological Primacy
Model.
Second Language
Research,
27(1), 107–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Somashekar, S.
(
1999)
Developmental
trends in the acquisition of relative clauses:
Cross-linguistic experimental study of
Tulu (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. Cornell University.
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Zhang, Linxi, Alfonso Morales-Front & Cristina Sanz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.