Cover not available
Part of
L3 Development After the Initial State
Edited by Megan M. Brown-Bousfield, Suzanne Flynn and Éva Fernández-Berkes
[Studies in Bilingualism 65] 2023
► pp. 29–48

A shared linguistic system of multilingual representations

| University of Southampton | Norwegian University of Science and Technology

This chapter discusses multilingual linguistic representations and probes the question of whether they form a shared linguistic system. Recent psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies of multilingual individuals suggest that this is indeed the case. Taking Minimalist morphosyntax and Lardiere’s (2009) feature reassembly as starting points, we consider whether a feature bundle can be updated and re-assembled as a complete unit in the third language, or whether it has to be broken down into separate features which are updated separately. The latter option makes sure that features from both known languages, if they are acquired to a functional level, can exert cross-linguistic influence (CLI). Restructuring each feature bundle depends not just on the availability of facilitation, but on other properties of the input which affect what becomes intake in the additional grammar. Both experiential factors (such as dominance and proficiency) and linguistic factors (such as frequency in the input and complexity) can and do affect the acquisition process.

Keywords: feature, feature bundle, Minimalist grammar, multilingualism, linguistic representations, input, intake, activation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic findings on multilingualism
  • 3.Models of language acquisition
  • 4.Feature bundles in third language acquisition
  • 5.Multiple grammars
  • 6.Activation
  • 7.Other factors affecting L3 acquisition
  • 8.Predictions
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.65.02sla
References
Abutalebi, J. & Green, D. W.
(2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L., & Roeper, T.
(2014) Multiple grammars and second language representation. Second Language Research, 30(1), 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S.
(2020) Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 115–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C-Y.
(1973) Variation and linguistic theory. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
(2008) The microparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.) The Limits of Syntactic Variation (pp. 351–374). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H., & Marian, V.
(2013) Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 547–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K.
(1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnacker, U.
(2006) When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22(4), 443–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
(1984) Parametric syntax. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M. et al.
(2003) Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. NeuroImage, 19(1), 113–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar
(2000) The architecture of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V.
(1992) Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Portraits of the L2 user. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S.
(1991) Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Science, 14, 597–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. W.
(2013) Explaining syntax: Representations, structures, and computation. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Maschio, N. & Abutalebi, J.
(2019) Language organization in the bilingual and multilingual brain. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 199–213). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. M.
(2016) Source(s) of syntactic CLI: The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani–Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(2), 225–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Berkes, É., & Flynn, S.
(2023) Grammatical mapping in L3 acquisition: A theory of development. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3 development after the initial state (pp. 8–28). John Benjamins. (this volume).Google Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(2002) Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–244). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R.
(1990) The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J.
(2004) Learning new sounds of speech: Reallocation of neural substrates. NeuroImage, 21(2), 494–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Alonso, J., Alemán Bañón, J., DeLuca, V., Miller, D. et al.
(2020) Event related potentials at initial exposure in third language acquisition: Implications from an artificial mini-grammar study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 56, 100939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D., & Abutalebi, J.
(2013) Language control in bilinguals: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psycholology, 25, 515–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Beerts, S., Loncke, M., Desmet, T., & Bernolet, S.
(2016) Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: Further evidence for shared syntax. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 14–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G., & Domínguez, L.
(2020) A model for L1 grammatical attrition. Second Language Research, 36(2), 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, I. N., Mitrofanova, N., Anderssen, M., Rodina, Y., Slabakova, R., & Westergaard, M.
(2023) Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition across linguistic modules. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(3), 717–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kantola, L., & Van Gompel, R. P. G.
(2011) Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39(2), 276–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J., Bobb, S. C., & Hoshino, N.
(2014) Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate language, cognition, and the brain. Current Directions of Psychological Science, 23(3), 159–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K.
(2000) A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(22), 11850–11857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A.
(2021) The role of crosslinguistic influence in multilingual processing: Lexicon versus syntax. Language Learning, 71(S1), 163–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2):173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lidz, J., & Gagliardi, A.
(2015) How nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 333–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
(1991) How to set parameters. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mitrofanova, N., Leivada, E., & Westergaard, M.
(2022) Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition: Evidence from artificial language learning. Paper presented at the Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition XVI conference, Trondheim, May 2022.
Miyake, A., & Shah, P.
(1999) Towards unified modules of working memory: Emerging consensus, unresolved theoretical issues and future research directions. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 442–458). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S.
(2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1979) Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., Johnstone, T., & Marinis, T.
(2014) fMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language. PLoS One, 9(5), e97298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T.
(1999) Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Multiple grammars and the logic of learnability in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J.
(2010) What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Gonzalez Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E.
(2019) Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M.
(2017) Introducing language and cognition: A map of the mind. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J.
(2014) The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.
(2021) Parameters and linguistic variation. In N. Allott, T. Lohndal, & G. Rey (Eds.), A companion to Chomsky (pp. 172–189). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2017) The Scalpel Model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. & García Mayo, M. del P.
(2015) The L3 syntax–discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M.
(2004) Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truscott, John & Sharwood Smith, Michael
(2019) The Internal Context of Bilingual Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Abutalebi, J. et al.
(2003) Early setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual brain. Neuron, 37(1), 159–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M.
(2021a) Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b) L3 acquisition and crosslinguistic influence as co-activation. Response to commentaries on the keynote “Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition.” Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
(2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(1990) The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1(4), 337–360. [URL]
Yang, C.
(2004) Universal Grammar, statistics, or both. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 451–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar