Cover not available
Part of
L3 Development After the Initial State
Edited by Megan M. Brown-Bousfield, Suzanne Flynn and Éva Fernández-Berkes
[Studies in Bilingualism 65] 2023
► pp. 1–6

L3 development after the initial state

Introduction

| Boston University
| University of Applied Sciences Burgenland
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.65.int
References (6)
Chomsky, N.
(2002) On nature and language (A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. & O’Neil, W. A.
(1988) Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., & Lust, B.
(2002) A minimalist approach to L2 solves a dilemma of UG. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 95–120). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lust, B. C.
(1999) Universal grammar: The strong continuity hypothesis in first language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 111–155). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B.
(2012) Tracking universals requires grammatical mapping. In K. Grohmann & A. Shelkovaya (Eds.), Linguists of tomorrow: Selected Papers from the 1st Cyprus Postgraduate Student Conference in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (p. 105–140). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
(2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar