Recursion is a central topic in language acquisition because it helps to inform an explanatorily adequate
theory of the human language faculty. Some researchers (e.g., Roeper, 2011)
have proposed that it is possible for children’s early grammars to include a transitory acquisition stage that is
based on conjunction rather than the truly recursive operation of merge which characterizes mature grammars.
A truth-value judgement task with an elicitation component was designed to elicit recursive genitive structures in
both Mandarin and English. Our results indicate that child participants in both Mandarin and English understood
recursive genitive structures and a substantial majority could also produce the target recursive genitive structures.
These results provide compelling evidence that recursion emerges early in child language acquisition and that there is
no need to propose a transitory stage that lacks a recursive procedure.
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us: Language and evolution. The MIT Press.
Boeckx, C. (2009). The nature of Merge: Consequences for language, mind, and biology. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagereka, & P. Salaburu (Eds.), Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque country (pp. 44–57). Oxford University Press.
Bolhuis, J. J., & Everaert, M. (2013). Birdsong, speech, and language: Exploring the evolution of mind and brain. The MIT Press.
Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition on child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). John Wiley & Sons.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy:MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 20.
Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press. (Original work published 1965).
Corballis, M. C. (2011). The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton University Press.
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 597–612.
Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, nurture and Universal Grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(2), 139–186.
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2000). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. The MIT Press.
Crain, S., Giblin, I., & Thornton, R. (2021). The deep forces that shape language and the poverty of the stimulus. In N. Allott, T. Lohndal, & G. Rey (Eds.), A Companion to Chomsky (pp. 462–475). John Wiley & Sons.
Culicover, P. (1976). Syntax. Academic Press.
den Dikken, M., & Dékány, É. (2018). A restriction on recursion. Syntax, 21, 37–71.
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646.
Everett, D. L. (2012). Language: The cultural tool. Pantheon Books.
Fitch, W. T., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a non-human primate. Science, 303, 377–380.
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97, 179–210.
Freeze, R. (1992). Existentials and other locatives. Language, 68, 553–595.
Gentile, S. (2003). On the acquisition of left-branching recursive possessives. Amherst: University of Massachusetts honors thesis.
Giblin, I., Zhou, P., Bill, C., Shi, J., & Crain, S. (2019). The spontaneous eMERGEence of recursion in child language. Proceedings of BUCLD, 43, 270–285.
Gu, C. (2008). Structural ambiguity and AP?PP recursion in language acquisition. Ms., University of Massachusetts.
Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1984). Acquisition of cognitive compiling. Cognition, 17(2), 85–136.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.
Hoekstra, T. (1984). Transitivity: Grammatical relations in Government-Binding theory. Foris.
Hoeksema, J. (2010). Feature percolation in the Dutch possessive. In C. J. Zwart and M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure Preserved: Studies in syntax for Jan Koster (pp. 167-174). John Benjamins.
Hollebrandse, B. (2018). Indirect recursion: The importance of second-order embedding and its implications for cross-linguistic research. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Recursion across domains, 35–47. Cambridge University Press.
Hollebrandse, B., & Roeper, T. (2014). Empirical results and formal approaches to recursion in acquisition. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition, studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (pp. 179–219). Springer.
Hornstein, N., Rosen, S., & Uriagereka, J. (1994). Integrals. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 70–90.
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y. Audrey, & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2010). Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. In R. K. Larson, V. Déprez, & H. Yamakido (Eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives (pp. 63–72). Cambridge University Press.
Lasnik, H., & Lidz, J. (2017). The argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar (pp. 221–248). Oxford University Press.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. John Wiley & Sons.
Lieven, E. (2009). Developing constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 191–199.
Limbach, M., & Adone, D. (2010). Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. Proceedings of BUCLD, 34, 281–290.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project. Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marcus, G. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1), 53–85.
Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D., & Rodrigues, C. (2009). Evidence and argumentation: A reply to Everett (2009). Language, 85(3), 671–681.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Castilla-Earls, A., Bejar, S., & Massam, D. (2012). Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition, 19(4), 301–311.
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306–338.
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it. Cognition, 95, 201–236.
Richards, N. (2006). A distinctness condition on linearization. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering trees. The MIT Press.
Roeper, T. (2007). The prism of grammar: How child language illuminates humanism. The MIT Press.
Roeper, T. (2010). Recursion: What is innate, why it needs a trigger, where it belongs in cross-linguistic work, and how it fits into the mind. Proceedings of Anpoll’s 1st International Psycholinguistics Congress, Rio de Janeiro (pp. 42–64).
Roeper, T. (2011). The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics, 5(1–2), 57–86.
Roeper, T., & Snyder, W. (2005). Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In A.-M. DiScullo (Ed.), UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation (pp. 155–169). John Benjamins.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ross, J. R. (1972). Doubl-ing. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 61–86.
Sauerland, U. (2018). False reports in Pirahã. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Recursion across domains (pp. 21–34). Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
van Riemsdijk, H. C. (1988). The representation of syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Basque Language, Second Basque World Congress (pp. 104–116). Central Publications Service of the Basque Government.
van Riemsdijk, H. C. (1998). Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 2, 1–48.
Wolfe, T. (2016). The kingdom of speech. Random House.
Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). The growth of language: Universal Grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 103–119.