Cover not available
Part of
Multifaceted Multilingualism
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Studies in Bilingualism 66] 2024
► pp. 184–203

Chapter 7
“Grammar, I hate” or “I grammar hate”?

L1 and L2 word order differences and bilingual DLD assessment

Cross-module interfaces, such as the syntax-semantics interface, are among the most problematic properties to fully acquire in a second language (L2). First language (L1) monodialectal and bidialectal speakers may show different performances at the interfaces in L2. However, little is known if such a different performance is caused by learners’ diverse L1 dialectal backgrounds. The study is motivated by the need to link speech-language pathology and word order typological studies in a bidialectal/bilingual context. The aim is to investigate L1 bidialectism in the L2 syntax-semantics interface acquisition outcome and to separate language difference from language disorder. A sentence-picture matching task on the topic-comment structure was administered among 37 Mandarin monodialectal and 39 Mandarin – Wu bidialectal child speakers. Results of a generalized linear model showed that L1 bidialectals exhibited better syntactic-semantic awareness in L2 than their L1 monodialectal counterparts. The results showed that mono- and bidialectal speakers have different performance patterns at the syntax-semantics interface involving noncanonical word orders for L2. However, the L2 performance was under the impact of language difference between L1 and L2, it does not qualify for Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). Finally, the study offers both theoretical and clinical implications for the diagnosis and assessment of bilingual DLD.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Developmental language disorder
  • 3.Word order typology of English and Chinese
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Ethics
    • 4.3Materials and procedure
    • 4.4Analysis and results
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.66.07han
References
Acuna, K.
(2013) 13 celebrities with the worst grammar on Twitter. Business Insider Australia. Retrieved 7 November 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar
Allerton, D.
(1979) Essentials of grammatical theory: A consensus view of syntax and morphology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S.
(2018) Vocabulary, metalinguistic awareness and language dominance among bilingual preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1953. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S., & de Jong, J.
(2015) Introduction. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children disentangling bilingualism form language impairment (pp. 1–2). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ASHA, A. S.-L.-H. A.
(2010) Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in schools (Professional Issues Statement). Retrieved 7 November 2023 from [URL]
Bedore, L. M., & Peña, E. D.
(2008) Assessment of bilingual children for identification of language impairment: Current findings and implications for practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bedore, L. M., Peña E. D., Anaya Jissel, B., Nieto, R., Lugo-Neris Mirza, J., & Baron, A.
(2018) Understanding disorder within variation: Production of English grammatical forms by English language learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(1987) Influences of bilingualism on metalinguistic development. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), 3(2), 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W.
(2001) Aspects of typology and universals. Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M.
(1979) Comprehension in developmental language disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21, 225–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Which neurodevelopmental disorders get researched and why? PLOS One, 5(11), e15112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 381–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52, 671–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., & Greenhalgh, T.
(2016) CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children. PLOS One, 11(7), e0158753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development. Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1068–1080. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., & Unsworth, S.
(2010) Experimental methods in language acquisition research. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunner, M., Keller, U., Wenger, M., Fischbach, A., & Lüdtke, O.
(2018) Between-school variation in students’ achievement, motivation, affect, and learning strategies: Results from 81 countries for planning group-randomized trials in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(3), 452–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chard, J. A.
(2019) Mandarin assessment in Chinese – English bilingual preschoolers (Unpublished PhD dissertation). City University of New York.Google Scholar
Chiat, S.
(2010) Mapping at the interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 261–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, K., & Gale, W. A.
(1995) Poisson mixtures. Natural Language Engineering, 1, 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1989) Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cowser, R. L.
(1973) Bidialectalism for the disadvantaged student. Improving College and University Teaching, 21(4), 303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R.
(1998) Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2006) Typology. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 337–368). Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Jong, J.
(2015) Elicitation task for subject-verb agreement. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children disentangling bilingualism form language impairment (pp. 25–37). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J., Cavus, N., & Baker, A.
(2010) Language impairment in Turkish – Dutch bilingual children. In S. Topbas & M. Yavas (Eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish (pp. 288–300). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Roeper, T., Bland-Stewart, L., & Pearson, B.
(2008) Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(1), 67–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S.
(2000) Generation of and retraction from cross-linguistically motivated structures in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 209-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
(2005) Order of subject, object, and verb. In B. Comrie, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), World atlas of language structures (pp. 330–333). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Gross, M., Chen, J., MacDonald, M. C., Kaplan, D., Brown, M., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2014) Dialect awareness and lexical comprehension of Mainstream American English in African American English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1883–1895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. V., Dodd, B., & Howard, D.
(2002) Risk factors for speech disorders in children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37, 117–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friesen, D. C., & Bialystok, E.
(2012) Metalinguistic ability in bilingual children: The role of executive control. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 12(3), 47–56.Google Scholar
Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. D., Bedore, L. M., Bohman, T. M., & Mendez-Perez, A.
(2013) Identification of specific language impairment in bilingual children: I. Assessment in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56, 1813–1823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M.
(1990) Feature blindness: A case study. Language Acquisition, 1, 139–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 109–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M., & Crago, M.
(1991) Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition, 39, 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H.
(1966) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of grammar (2 ed., pp. 73–113). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Typology/universals and second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Cross currents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 37–44). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, A., & Schulz, P.
(2014) Specific language impairment and early second language acquisition: The risk of over- and underdiagnosis. Child Indicators Research, 7(4), 821–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., & Kambanaros, M.
(2016) The gradience of multilingualism in typical and impaired language development: Positioning bilectism within comparative bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., & Belletti, A.
(2006) Developmental patterns in the acquisition of complement clitic pronouns: Comparing different acquisition modes with an emphasis on French. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 31, 39–78.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M.-B., Angulo-Jiménez, H., Taylo, C., & DeThorne, L. S.
(2018) Clinical implications for working with nonmainstream dialect speakers: A focus on two Filipino kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 497–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, W.
(2013) Word order typology: Topic and topic marker structure. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Difference or disorder: What does L1 bidialectism tell about child SLA at the syntax-semantics interface? Invited talk presented at the Macquarie University CLaS-CCD Workshop: Issues in Bilingual and Multilingual Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Han, W., Brebner, C., & McAllister, S.
(2016) Redefining ‘Chinese’ L1 in SLP: Considerations for the assessment of Chinese bilingual-bidialectal language skills. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(2), 135–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. Y., & Schnur, T. T.
(2016) Different loci of semantic interference in picture naming vs. word-picture matching tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
(1983) Word order universals. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huang, K.-J.
(2016) On bilinguals’ development of metalinguistic awareness and its transfer to L3 learning: The role of language characteristics. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(3), 330–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227-244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T.
(2012) Formal theory-based methodologies. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 30–52). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K.
(2010) Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 456–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Language disorders in bilingual children and adults (2nd ed.). Plural.Google Scholar
Kouridou, T.
(2009) A bidialectal methodology of teaching English as a second language. In M. Dufresne, F. Dupuis, & E. Vocaj (Eds.), Selected Papers from 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 223–231). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T.
(2018) Recent developments in early bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 653–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B.
(1989) Language learnability and specifific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 179–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Children with specific language impairment. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
(1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linebarger, M., Schwartz, M., & Saffran, E.
(1983) Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 3, 361–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.
(2001) Two major typological features of Wu dialects. Dialect, 4, 332–343.Google Scholar
Luuk, E.
(2015) Syntax-semantics interface. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 900–905). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1995) Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & Chondrogianni, V.
(2011) Comprehension of reflexives and pronouns in sequential bilingual children: Do they pattern similarly to L1 children, L2 adults, or children with specific language impairment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 202–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J. B., Gregory, K. D., & Rivière, A. M.
(2016) Changing how speech-language pathologists think and talk about dialect variation. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(16), 28–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, H., Amano, H., & Kondo, M.
(2013) Gamma-poisson distribution model for test categorization. ISRN Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orgassa, A.
(2009) Specific language impairment in a bilingual context: The acquisition of Dutch inflection by Turkish – Dutch learners. LOT Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
Palesch, Y. Y.
(2014) Some common misperceptions about p values. Stroke, 45(12), e244–e246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papapavlou, A., & Kouridou, T.
(2007) Bidialectism and metalinguistic awareness. In A. Papapavlou & P. Pavlou (Eds.), Sociolinguistic and pedagogical dimensions of dialects in education (pp. 216–235). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Papastergiou, A., Pappas, V., & Sanoudaki, E.
(2022) The executive function of bilingual and monolingual children: A technical efficiency approach. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1319–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M.
(2011) Dual language development and disorder: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning (2nd ed.). Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. L.
(2016) Child language disorders across languages, cultural contexts and syndromes. In J. L. Patterson & R. L. Rodríguez (Eds.), Multilingual perspectives on child language disorders (pp. 1–29). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z.
(2013) Distinguish the bilingual as a late talker from the late talker who is bilingual. In L. A. Rescorla & P. S. Dale (Eds.), Late talkers: Language development, interventions, and outcomes (pp. 67–87). Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Prezas, R. F., & Jo, A. A.
(2017) Differentiating language difference and language disorder: Information for teachers working with English language learners in the schools. Journal of Human Services: Training, Research, and Practice, 2(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Ridout, M., Demétrio, C. G. B., & Hinde, J.
(1998) Models for count data with many zeros. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XIXth International Biometric Conference, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, R. L.
(2016) Linguistic variation and assessment implications for Spanish-speaking children in the United States. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
(2011) The mind-context divide: On acquisition at the linguistic interfaces. Lingua, 121, 568–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, U., & von Stechow, A.
(2001) Syntax-semantics interface. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 15412–15418). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M.
(2012) Introducing second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C., & Miller, K.
(2010) Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research. In S. Unsworth & E. Blom (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 35–56). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P., Wymann, K., & Penner, Z.
(2001) The early acquisition of verb meaning in German by normally developing and language impaired children. Brain and Language, 77(3), 407–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, E.
(1998) Categorical models of childhood disorder: A conceptual and empirical analysis. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(1), 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. T.
(2005) Early lexical and syntactic development in Quebec French and English: implications for cross-linguistic and bilingual assessment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(3), 243–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Typical language development and primary language impairment in monolingual French-speaking children. In J. L. Patterson & R. L. Rodríguez (Eds.), Multilingual perspectives on child language disorders (pp. 176–208). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., & Zhang, X.
(1996) A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1284–1294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S.
(1986) Basic word order: Functional principles. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Toppelberg, C. O., & Shapiro, T.
(2000) Language disorders: A 10-year research update review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(2), 143–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L.
(2015) Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children disentangling bilingualism form language impairment. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J.
(1994) Canonical linking rules: Forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Cognition, 51, 29–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Harris, M.
(1990) Comprehension of reversible sentences in specifically language impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verreyt, N., Bogaerts, L., Cop, U., Bernolet, S., De Letter, M., Hemelsoet, D., … & Duyck, W.
(2013) Syntactic priming in bilingual patients with parallel and differential aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 867–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(2009) Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Emerald.Google Scholar
Yiakoumetti, A., & Esch, E.
(2010) Educational complexities inherent in bidialectal communities and the potential contribution of the Common European Framework to second-dialect development. In L. Carson & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Policy, curriculum, classroom (pp. 291–312). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yiakoumetti, A., & Mina, M.
(2011) The influence of first-language bidialectism in foreign-language classrooms: Observations from Cyprus. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(3), 287–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar