Cover not available
Part of
Multifaceted Multilingualism
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Studies in Bilingualism 66] 2024
► pp. 327–368

Chapter 13
Meaning without borders

From translanguaging to transposition in the era of digitally-mediated meaning

| University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
| University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
| University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign | University of Illinois, Chicago

“Translanguaging” is a concept that connects with older traditions of analysis in linguistics and practices in language pedagogy, while at the same time making some distinctions that justify the creation of a new word. This chapter begins by tracing roots of the idea of translanguaging in its intellectual predecessors and affiliates: code switching, translation, bilingualism, multilingualism, hybridity, and multiliteracies. In the sections that follow, we set out to extend the terms of this discussion by introducing another concept, “transposition,” designed to cast the net wider than language and capturing the restless fluidity of multiform meaning making between and across text, image, space, object, body, sound and speech. From here, we go on to explore the implications of a transpositional analysis for varieties of pedagogical practice in learning another language. Next, we use this frame of analysis to explore the characteristic features of digital media. These precipitate a renewed urgency to reconsider the terms of our theoretical discussions and pedagogical practices. They also raise challenges, at once deeply concerning and potentially productive, for the job of language teaching and its professional practices. The chapter concludes by addressing pedagogy, and in particular the development of an extended repertoire of practice for another language learning in the era of digitally-mediated meanings. This returns us to theme of the chapter, “meaning without borders,” or the project of supplementing traditional analyses of meaning-through-language with a widened repertoire of pedagogical practice for language teachers.

Article outline
  • 1.Ways of speaking about language mixing
  • 2.Transposition: Tracing restless movement in the patterning of meaning
  • 3.Multiform meaning, and the differences between speech and text
  • 4.Varieties of language mixing in pedagogical practice
  • 5.Digital transpositions
  • 6.Towards a pedagogical repertoire in another language learning
    • 5.1Bringing the experiences of everyday meaning to class (Situated practice: 1)
    • 5.2Experiencing new realms of meaning (Situated practice: 2)
    • 5.3Conceptualizing meaning patterns, or grammatical thinking
    • 5.4Analytical learning: Functional or critical
    • 5.5Applying (Transformed practice: 1)
    • 5.6Creative, design and life-transformative practices (Transformed practice: 2)
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.66.13cop
References
Abrams, S. S.
(2013) Peer review and nuanced power structures: Writing and learning within the age of connectivism. e-Learning and Digital Media 10(4), 396–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arvanitis, E., Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B.
(2014) Heritage language policies in the context of Australian civic pluralism. In P. P. Trifonas & T. Aravossitas (Eds.), Rethinking heritage language education (pp. 115–140). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C.
(2003) Biliteracy and transliteracy in Wales: Language planning and the Welsh national curriculum. In N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings (pp. 71–90). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1975) [1981] The dialogic imagination: Four essays, edited by M. Holquist Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baynham, M., & Lee, T. K.
(2019) Translation and translanguaging. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blyth, C. S.
(2015) Exploring the complex nature of language and culture through intercultural dialogue: The case of Cultura. In D. Koike & C. S. Blyth (Eds.), Dialogue in multilingual and multimodal communities (pp. 139–165). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S.
(2011) Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Materializing ‘competence’: Perspectives from international stem scholars. The Modern Language Journal 102(2), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Churchill, W.
(1930) My early life: A roving commission. Oldhams.Google Scholar
Cope, B.
(1998) The language of forgetting: A short history of the word. In M. Fraser (Ed.), Seams of light: Best antipodean essays (pp. 192–223). Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M.
(Eds.) (1993a) The powers of literacy: Genre approaches to teaching writing. Falmer Press.Google Scholar
(1993b) The power of literacy and the literacy of power. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: Genre approaches to teaching writing (pp. 63–89). Falmer Press.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2000) Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009) ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Extraurbia, or, the reconfiguration of spaces and flows in a time of spatial-financial crisis. In D. Araya (Ed.), Smart cities as democratic ecologies (pp. 219–246). Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2017) E-learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Education 2.0: Artificial intelligence and the end of the test. Beijing International Review of Education, 1, 528–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Making sense: Reference, agency and structure in a grammar of multimodal meaning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Searsmith, D.
(2020) Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(16), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1979) Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. In Working Papers on Bilingualism (pp. 198–205). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
(2017) Teaching minoritized students: Are additive approaches legitimate? Harvard Educational Review, 87(3), 404–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) The emergence of translanguaging pedagogy: A dialogue between theory and practice. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 9(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
(2021) Translanguaging: A critical analysis of theoretical claims. In P. Juvonen & M. Källkvist (Eds.), Pedagogical translanguaging: Teachers and researchers shaping plurilingual practices (pp. 7–36). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J., & Early, M.
(2011) Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Trentham.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Swain, M.
(1986) Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and practice. Longman.Google Scholar
Dávila, L. T.
(2019) “J’aime to be funny!”: Humor, learning, and identity construction in high school English as a second language classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 502–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A.
(1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. L.
(2019) Translanguaging into raciolinguistic ideologies: A personal reflection on the legacy of Ofelia García. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 9(1/5), 45–60.Google Scholar
Fraser, N.
(2008) Reframing justice in a globalizing world. In K. Olson (Ed.), Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics (pp. 273–294). Verso.Google Scholar
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A.
(2019) Translanguaging and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 1–19.Google Scholar
García, O., & Otheguy, R.
(2020) Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(1), 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Wei, L.
(2018) Translanguaging. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P.
(1996) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D.
(Eds.) (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D.
(1998) Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind Culture and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1987) [2002] Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. J. Webster (Eds.), On grammar: The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday (Vol. 1, pp. 323–351). Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1985) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M.
(Eds.) (2018) Metacognition in language: Learning and teaching. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsu, L., & Zacharias, S.
(2019) Challenging the translingual turn: TESOL student teachers’ perceptions, practices and networks. British Council.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H.
(1989) Continua of biliteracy. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 271–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1959) On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On Translation (pp. 232–239). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakonen, T., Szabó, T. P., & Laihonen, P.
(2017) Translanguaging as playful subversion of a monolingual norm in the classroom. In G. Mazzaferro (Ed.), Translanguaging as everyday practice (pp. 31–48). Springer.Google Scholar
Jaspers, J.
(2018) The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language & Communication, 58, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B.
(2020) Adding sense: Context and interest in a grammar of multimodal meaning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L.
(2016) Literacies (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Slade, D.
(1989) Minority languages and dominant culture: Issues of education, assessment and social equity. Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Solomon, N., Luke, A., Morgan, B., & Nakata, M.
(1994) Batchelor College entry profile and stage level assessment scales. Batchelor College.Google Scholar
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Zapata, G. C.
(2020) Las alfabetizaciones múltiples: Teoría y práctica. Ediciones Octaedro.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E.
(2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kourtis-Kazoullis, V., & Skourtou, E.
(2004) The internet and English language learning: Opening up spaces for constructivist and transformative pedagogy through sister-class networks. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, Part II (pp. 763–776). Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kress, G.
(2009) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K.
(2003) The making of English national identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzi, S., Cope, B., Ferguson, D., Geigle, C., & Zhai, C. X.
(2019) Automatic assessment of complex assignments using topic models. L@S '19: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W.
(Eds.) (2007) Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., Ardeshiri, M., & Cummins, J.
(2016) A computer-assisted multiliteracies programme as an alternative approach to EFL instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(5), 595–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H.
(1974) [1991] The production of space. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y.
(2019) Theories of translanguaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Educationand Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lizárraga, J. R., & Gutiérrez, K. D.
(2018) Centering Nepantla literacies from the borderlands: Leveraging “in-betweenness” toward learning in the everyday. Theory into Practice, 57(1), 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, J.
(2014) Domesticating the foreign: Globalization’s effects on the place/s of languages. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 312–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, H.
(2011) Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lütge, C., & Stannard, M.
(Eds.) (2020) Foreign language learning in the digital age: Theory and pedagogy for developing literacies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A.
(2012) Disinventing multilingualism: From monological multilingualism to multilingua francas. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp. 439–453). Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wignell, P., Eggins S., & Rothery, J.
(1986) Secret English: jargon and bullshit in a secondary school. Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
May, S.
(Ed.) (2014) The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Menezes de Souza, L. M. T.
(2019) Decolonial pedagogies, multilingualism and literacies. Multilingual Margins, 9(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
Mills, K. A.
(2015) Doing digital composition on the social web: Knowledge processes in literacy learning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 172–185). Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N.
(1992) Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monte Mór, W.
(2008) Critical literacies, meaning making and new epistemological perspectives. Matices en Lenguas Extranjeras, 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
Montebello, M., Pinheiro, P., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Amina, T., Searsmith, D., & Cao, D.
(2018) The impact of the peer review process evolution on learner performance in e-learning environments. L@S '18: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairn, T.
(2015) The break-up of Britain: Crisis and neo-nationalism. Common Ground Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakata, M.
(2007) Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A.
(2010) Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 240–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, N.
(2009) Radical hope: Education and equality in Australia. Black.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2019) Pushing the ontological boundaries of English. In C. J. Hall & R. Wicaksono (Eds.), Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 355–367). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E.
(2019) Mundane metrolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 175–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, R.
(1992) Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, P.
(2018) Text revision practices in an e-learning environment: Fostering the learning by design perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14, 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rajendram, S.
(2015) Potentials of the multiliteracies pedagogy for teaching English language learners (Ells): A review of the literature. Critical Intersections in Education, 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sanders-Smith, S. C., & Dávila, L. T.
(2019) Progressive practice and translanguaging: Supporting multilingualism in a Hong Kong preschool. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(3), 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., Kell, P., & Pandian, A.
(2002) Appropriating English: Innovation in the global business of English language teaching. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Skourtou, E.
(2010) Connecting Greek and Canadian schools through an internet-based sister-class network. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(2), 85–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soja, E. M.
(2010) Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. C.
1988 [1993] Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory (pp. 66–111). Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Phillips, N. C.
(2017) Developing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 68–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J.-A., & Doré, N.
(2019) Translanguaging and the no voice policy in L2 sign language contexts. Caheirs de l’ILOB, 10, 273–289.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, S.
(2009) Doing (bi)lingualism: Language alternation as performative construction of online identities. Pragmatics, 19(3), 361–391.Google Scholar
Tzirides, A. O.
(2022) Smart online language learning modules: An exploration of the potential of advanced digital technologies and artificial intelligence for collaborative language learning utilizing translanguaging and multimodal communication approaches (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Vaughan, J.
(2019) The ordinariness of translinguistics in indigenous Australia. In J. W. Lee & S. Dovchin (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 90–103). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vold, E. T.
(2018) Using machine-translated texts to generate L3 learners’ metalinguistic talk. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in language: Learning and teaching (pp. 67–97). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1962) [1978] Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waquet, F.
(2001) Latin, or the empire of the sign. Verso.Google Scholar
Wei, L.
(2018) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, L., & Ho, W. Y. (J.)
(2018) Language learning sans frontiers: A translanguaging view. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 33–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U.
(1953) [1970] Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Mouton.Google Scholar
Williams, C.
(2002) A language gained: A study of language immersion at 11–16 years of age. University of Wales.Google Scholar
(2012) Subject language threshold: Accelerating the process of reaching the threshold. National immersion scheme guidance for teachers. The Welsh Language Board.Google Scholar
Zacchi, V. J.
(2018) Literacies and digital gaming: Negotiating meanings in English language teacher education. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 10(1), 153–168.Google Scholar
Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M.
(Eds.) (2018) Multiliteracies pedagogy and language learning: Teaching Spanish to heritage speakers. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zapata, G. C., & Ribota, A.
(2020) The instructional benefits of identity texts and learning by design for learner motivation in required second language classes. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 16, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar