Chapter 13
Phonological features and phonetic variation in multilingual grammars
Restructuring an L3 contrastive hierarchy
Drawing on Archibald (2022a, b), the chapter shows how a contrastive hierarchy model of segmental phonology can provide
formal model of determining cross-linguistic similarity. Looking primarily at Arabic-French learners of English, the
L1 and L2 features (including the markedness value of the feature) and the rankings influence L3
acquisition. Neurolinguistic and sociolinguistic evidence for the differential behaviour of marked versus unmarked
values are discussed, and then it is shown how this variation can act as a cue for the learner to discover the L3
grammatical hierarchy. The author explores a theory of L3 restructuring based on principles of merger, redeployment,
and triggering. Ultimately, it is argued that the learner compares the L1 and L2 contrastive hierarchy parses of the
L3 input and chooses the one which is optimal for the L3 grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Phonological features
- 2.1The phonetics/phonology interface
- 2.1.1Rhotics
- 2.1.2Laryngeals
- 2.2The role of input
- 2.3Input variation as a learning cue
- 2.4Laryngeal features redux
- 2.5Privative or binary?
- 2.6A learning theory
- 3.The contrastive hierarchy, cue re-weighting and the parsing of English
- 3.1Features, cues and variation
- 3.2Processing markedness
- 3.3Reanalysis with contrastive hierarchy theory
- 3.4Arabic-French learners of English
- 4.Restructuring
- 4.1Phonological learnability
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (48)
References
Al-Tamimi, J. (2017). Revisiting
acoustic correlates of pharyngealization in Jordanian and Moroccan Arabic: Implications for formal
representations. Laboratory
Phonology, 8(1), 1–40. 

Archibald, J. (2023). Differential
substitution: a contrastive hierarchy account. Frontiers in Language
Sciences 2:1242905. 

Archibald, J. (2022b). Segmental
and prosodic evidence for property-by-property phonological transfer in L3 English in northern
Africa. Languages, 7(1), 28. 

Archibald, J. (2022c). Using
Jaccard distance to measure the linguistic I-proximity of phonological inventories in a contrastive
hierarchy. L3
Workshop. London. October.
Archibald, J. (2021). Phonological
redeployment and the mapping problem: Cross-linguistic E‑similarity is the beginning of the story, not the
end. Second Language
Research, 39(1). 

Beckman, J., Jessen, M., & C. Ringen (2013). Empirical
evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal
of
Linguistics, 49, 259–284. 

Benrabah, M. (1991). Learning
English segments with two languages. In P. Romeas (Ed.), Proceedings
of the International Congress of Phonetic
Sciences (pp. 334–37). Université de Aix-en-Provence.
Berwick, R. (1985). The
acquisition of syntactic knowledge. The MIT Press. 

Bohn, O. S. (1995). Cross-language
speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it
all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech
perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language
research (pp. 279–304). York Press.
Cowper, E. & Hall, D. C. 2019. Scope
variation in contrastive hierarchies of morphosyntactic
features. In D. Lightfoot & J. Havenhill (Eds.), Variable
properties in language: Their nature and
acquisition (pp. 27–41). Georgetown University Press. 

Cowper, E. & Hall, D. C. (2014). Reductio
ad discriminem: Where features come
from. Nordlyd, 41(2), 145–164. 

Cummings, A., Wu, Y., & Ogiela, D. (2021). Phonological
underspecification: An explanation for how a rake can become awake. Frontiers
in Human
Neuroscience, 15, 585817. 

Deterding, D., & Nolan, F. (2007). Aspiration
and voicing of Chinese and English
plosives. In Proceedings of the 16th International
Congress of Phonetic
Sciences (pp. 385–388). Saarland University.
Docherty, G. (1992). The
timing of voicing in British English
obstruents. Foris. 

Dresher, B. E. (2009). The
contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press. 

Dresher, B. Elan. ( 2018). Contrastive
hierarchy theory and the nature of features. In W. G. Bennett, L. Hracs, & D. R. Storoshenko (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics (pp. 18–29). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Eulitz, C., & Lahiri, A. (2004). Neurobiological
evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech
recognition. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 16, 577–583. 

Francis, A. L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2000). Effects
of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception and
Psychophysics, 62, 1668–1680. 

Fu, Z., & Monahan, P. (2021). Extracting
phonetic features from natural classes: A mismatch negativity study of Mandarin Chinese retroflex
consonants. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 

Gardner, H., & Roeder, R. (2022). Phonological
mergers have systemic phonetics consequences: PALM, trees, and the low back merger
shift. Language Variation and
Change, 34(1), 29–52. 

Hall, D. C. (2016). Contrast
and phonological activity in the vowel system of Laurentian French. Toronto
Working Papers in Linguistics, 37. Retrieved
on 17 December
2023 from [URL]
Harmon, Z., Idemaru, K., & Kapatsinski, V. (2019). Mechanisms
in cue
reweighting. Cognition 189, 76–88. 

Hayes, B. (1984). The
phonetic and phonology of Russian voicing
assimilation. In M. Aronoff & R. T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language
sound
structure (pp. 318–328). The MIT Press.
Hestvik, A., Scharinger, M., Shafr, V., & Lahiri, A. (2022). Phonological
representations and mismatch negativity asymmetries. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 16. 

Hestvik, A., & Durvasula, K. (2016). Neurobiological
evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain and
Language, 152, 28–43. 

Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2006). Cue
weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language
acquisition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 119, 3059–3071. 

Kulikov, V. (2012). Voicing
and voice assimilation in Russian stops (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Iowa. 
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A
cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical
measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. 

Mandal, S., Best, C., Shaw, J., & Cutler, A. (2020). Bilingual
phonology in dichotic perception: A case study of Malayalam and English
voicing. Glossa, 5(1), 1–17. 

Natvig, D. & Salmons, J. (2021). Connecting
structure and variation in sound change. Cadernos de
Lingüistica, 2(1), 1–20. 

Natvig, D. (2020). Rhotic
underspecification: Deriving variability and arbitrariness through phonological
representations. Glossa , 5(1), 1–28. 

Oxford, W. (2015). Patterns
of contrast in phonological change: Evidence form Algonquian vowel
systems. Language, 91, 308–357. 

Özçelik, Ö. (2016). The
prosodic acquisition path hypothesis: towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of
phonology. Glossa, 1(1), 1–48. 

Purnell, T., Raimy, E., & Salmons, J. (2019). Old
English vowels: Diachrony, privativity, and phonological
representations. Language, 95(4), 447–473. 

Rhodes, R., Avcu, E., Han, C., & Hestvik, A. (2022). Auditory
predictions are phonological when phonetic information is variable. Language,
Cognition and
Neuroscience, 37(9), 1099–1114. 

Ringen, C., & Kulikov, V. (2012). Voicing
in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic
Linguistics, 20(2), 269–286. 

Schluter, K., Politzer-Ahles, S., Al Kaabi, M., & Almeida, D. (2017). Laryngeal
features are phonetically abstract: Mismatch negativity evidence from Arabic, English, and
Russian. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8, 746. 

Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K. (2007). Acoustic
variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic contact
effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 122(2), 1111–1129. 

Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., & Coughlin, C. (2018). The
functional weight of a prosodic cue in the native language predicts the learning of speech segmentation in a
second language. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 21(3), 640–652. 

Walker, D. C. (1984). The
pronunciation of Canadian French. University of Ottawa Press.
Westergaard, M. (2021). Microvariation
in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property
acquisition. Second Language
Research, 37(3), 397–407. 

Wiese, R. (2000). The
phonology of German. Oxford University Press.
Wu, J. (2021). A
contrastive hierarchy analysis of the Mandarin vowel
system. In A. Hernández & C. Plyley (Eds.), Proceedings
of the CLA Annual conference. [URL]
Yang, Y., Chen, X., & Xiao, Q. (2022) Cross-similarity
in L2 speech learning: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin
speakers. Second Language
Research, 38, 3–29. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.