Cover not available
Article published In:
Humour in Spanish Context
Edited by Larissa Timofeeva-Timofeev
[Spanish in Context 18:1] 2021
► pp. 136–159

The role of humorous elements in Cádiz chirigotas in creating/reinforcing a local identity

A relevance-theoretic approach

| Universidad de Sevilla
This paper adopts a relevance-theoretic perspective to analyse how chirigotas – one of the types of bands in Cádiz carnival – exploit a series of verbal and visual comic elements in order to create or reinforce local identity: (i) the names of the bands, (ii) their attire, (iii) gestures and (iv) the lyrics of their comical songs, which satirise, mock, criticise, ridicule, praise, flatter or censure events or states of affairs. These elements will be argued to make manifest assumptions, activate (private) mental frames or express attitudes about those events or states of affairs, which the audience discover are already manifest to, and shared by, its members. Checking that other people entertain similar assumptions about and/or have similar attitudes towards those events or states of affairs – i.e. the ‘joy of manifestness’ – will be shown to be essential for generating a feeling of in-group membership on which that of a local identity greatly depends.
Keywords: humour, Cádiz carnival, relevance theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cádiz carnival and its groups
  • 3.Relevance theory and humour
    • 3.1Relevance and comprehension
    • 3.2The relevance-theoretic approach to humour
  • 4.Creating/reinforcing a local identity through humorous elements
    • 4.1Chirigotas’ names
    • 4.2The disguise
    • 4.3The lyrics
    • 4.4Paralanguage
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00071.pad
References (72)
References
Al-Jende, Abel, Carmen Guerrero, and José M. Manjavacas. 2008. “Agrupaciones ‘ilegales’ o ‘callejeras’ del carnaval de Cádiz: Espacio social autónomo y patrimonio cultural.” In Patrimonios culturales: Educación e interpretación. Cruzando límites y produciendo alternativas, ed. by Xerardo Pereiro, Santiago Prado, and Hiroko Takenaka, 140–154. San Sebastián: Ankulegi.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2002. “Semiotics and Pragmatics of Humor Communication.” Babel A.F.I.A.L. (Special issue on humour): 25–66.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelman, and Sara di Maio. 2002. “Script Oppositions and Logical Mechanisms: Modeling Incongruities and Their Resolutions.” Humor 15 (1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attridge, Derek. 1988. Peculiar Language: Literature as Difference from the Renaissance to Joyce. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Barceló Calatayud, Ana M. 2014. El tipo en el carnaval de Cádiz. Propuesta para una catalogación. Universidad de Cádiz: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Brisset Martín, Demetrio. 2011. “Los carnavales de Cádiz.” Aventura de la Historia 1481: 86–87.Google Scholar
Brottman, Mikita. 2004. Funny Peculiar. Gershon Legman and the Psychopathology of Humor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiaro, Delia. 2011. “Comic Takeover or Comic Makeover? Notes on Humour, Translating, Translation and (Un)Translatability.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 365–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cundall, Michael. 2007. “Humour and the Limits of Incongruity.” Creativity Research Journal 191: 203–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Christie. 2011. Jokes and Targets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2007. “Joking Aside: Sociopragmatic Functions of Conversational Humour in Interpersonal Communication.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Joanna Nijakowska, 246–268. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2010. “How Do Puns Bear Relevance?” In Relevance Studies in Poland. Volume 3. Exploring Translation and Communication Problems, ed. by Marta Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Agnieszka Piskorska, and Ewa Wałaszewska, 105–124. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “What RT Cannot Do, IR Can: On the Incremental Interpretation of Jokes in (Non)Relevance-theoretic Terms.” In Relevance Theory: More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska, and Agnieszka Piskorska, 147–166. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Garden Paths, Red Lights and Crossroads: On Finding Our Way to Understanding the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Jokes.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research 11: 6–28.Google Scholar
Fernández Jiménez, Estrella. 2016. El potencial comunicativo de las chirigotas gaditanas y su realización televisiva. Universidad de Sevilla: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannantonio. 2008. “Is the Concept of Incongruity Still a Useful Construct for the Advancement of Humor Research?” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1997. “Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 81: 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Martínez, Adolfo E. 1984. “Tabúes y eufemismos en un fenómeno de literatura efímera.” Tavira 11: 69–80.Google Scholar
1999. “Andalucismos del léxico disponible de la provincia de Cádiz.” Biblid 161: 181–193.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2000. “Functions of Humour in the Conversations of Men and Women.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 709–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Lomas Salmonte, Francisco J., Rafael Sánchez Saus, Manuel Bustos, Alberto Ramos Santana, and José L. Millán Chivite. 2005. Historia de Cádiz. Madrid: Sílex.Google Scholar
López Domínguez, Ana. 2013. “Cómo enseñar la ironía desde la propia cultura.” [URL]
Mariscal Sánchez, Cintia. 2017. La imagen de Andalucía en el carnaval de Cádiz a través de las comparsas. Universidad de Sevilla: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
McGhee, Paul E. (ed.). 1979. Humor: Its Origin and Development. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Moreno Caballud, Luis. 2014. ““Todo el año es carnaval”: Tradiciones populares y contracultura en la Transición.” Kamchatka. Revista de Análisis Cultural 41: 101–123.Google Scholar
Moreno Tello, Santiago. 2015. El carnaval silenciado. Golpe de estado, guerra, dictadura y represión en el febrero gaditano (1936–1945). Universidad de Cádiz: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Noh, Eun-Ju. 2000. Metarepresentation. A Relevance-Theory Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osuna, Javier. 2002. Cádiz, cuna de dos cantes. Cádiz: Quórum.Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2004. Aproximación pragmática a los enunciados fáticos: enfoque social y cognitivo. Universidad de Sevilla: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Metarepresentations and Phatic Utterances: A Pragmatic Proposal about the Generation of Solidarity Between Interlocutors.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Joanna Nijakowska, 110–128. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemic Vigilance, Cautious Optimism and Sophisticated Understanding.” Research in Language 10 (4): 365–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “On the Role of Vigilance in the Interpretation of Puns.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 28 (3): 469–490.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Vigilance Mechanisms in Interpretation: Hermeneutical Vigilance.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133 (1): 21–29.Google Scholar
Páramo Sánchez, M. Luisa. 2016. El carnaval de Cádiz como factoría de literatura popular. Un acercamiento al proceso de creación y transmisión de sus coplas. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2017. El carnaval de las coplas, un arte de Cádiz. Madrid: Izana.Google Scholar
Payán Sotomayor, Pedro. 2000. “El carnaval de Cádiz, origen y evolución (siglos XVI a XIX).” Ubi Sunt? Revista de Historia 61: 19.Google Scholar
. 2004. El habla de Cádiz. Cádiz: Quórum.Google Scholar
Ramos Santana, Alberto. 1985. Historia del carnaval de Cádiz. Cádiz: Caja de Ahorros de Cádiz.Google Scholar
. 2002. El carnaval secuestrado o la historia del carnaval. Cádiz: Quórum.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. David. 2005. “Frame-shifting in Humor and Irony.” Metaphor and Symbol 201: 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor. 2012. La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Eva Hache y El Club de la Comedia: Del guión monológico al registro dialógico.” Onomázein 281: 148–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “El monólogo humorístico como tipo de discurso. El dinamismo de los rasgos primarios.” Cuadernos AISPI 21: 195–218.Google Scholar
. 2013c. “Narrative Strategies in Buenafuente’s Monologues.” In Irony and Humor. From Pragmatics to Discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 107–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Infiriendo el humor. Un modelo de análisis para el español.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 591: 148–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacaluga Rodríguez, Ignacio. 2014. El carnaval de Cádiz como generador de información, opinión y contrapoder: Análisis crítico de su impacto en línea y fuera de línea. Universidad Europea de Madrid: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Las agrupaciones del carnaval de Cádiz: un ejercicio creativo de contrapoder.” Creatividad y Sociedad 241: 4–31.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Aproximación al impacto del carnaval de Cádiz en la prensa escrita gaditana.” Etic@net 16 (1): 64–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacaluga Rodríguez, Ignacio, and Álvaro Pérez García. 2016. “Carnaval de Cádiz y cine, una relación recíproca.” Periférica: Revista para el Análisis de la Cultura y el Territorio 171: 299–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacaluga Rodríguez, Ignacio, Álvaro Pérez García, M. Luisa Páramo Sánchez, Santiago Moreno, Felipe Barbosa Illescas, and Francisco García Gallardo. 2017. El carnaval de Cádiz: De las coplas a la industria cultural. Cádiz: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar
Solska, Agnieszka. 2012a. “Relevance-theoretic Comprehension Procedure and Processing Multiple Meanings in Paradigmatic Puns.” In Relevance Theory. More than Understanding, ed. by Agnieska Piskorska, and Ewa Wałaszewska, 167–182. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2012b. “The Relevance-based Model of Context in Processing Puns.” Research in Language 10 (4): 387–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What Is Intelligence?, ed. by Jean Khalfa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2000. Metarepresentations. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44): 117–149.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M. 1972. “A Two-stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-processing Analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. by Jeffrey H. Goldstein, and Paul E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press, 81–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2009. The Pragmatics of Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 1999. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 111: 127–161.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141: 249–290.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Larry Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2002. “Stand-up Comedy and Cultural Spread: The Case of Sex Roles.” Babel A.F.I.A.L. 101 (Special issue on humour studies): 245–292.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Humour and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1295–1331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “A Relevance-theoretic Classification of Jokes.” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 131–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “An Inference-centred Analysis of Jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of Humorous Communication.” In Irony and Humor: Highlights and Genres, ed. by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir. 1998. “What Is Phatic Communication?” In Current Issues in Relevance Theory, ed. by Villy Rouchota, and Andreas H. Jucker, 327–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir, and Billy Clark. 1999. “Phatic Interpretations and Phatic Communication.” Journal of Linguistics 351: 321–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar