Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 20:1 (2023) ► pp.96129
References
Amador, Carmen
2020No molesta el lenguaje inclusivo, lo que molesta es el feminismo. El Tribuno. [URL]
Anunciante
2020#España| Tema cerrado: “Todes” no se acepta en la Real Academia Española. [URL]
Battista Lo Bianco, Lucía
2016¿Qué pasa cuando hablamos con “X” y con “E”?. La Izquierda Diario. [URL]
Betti, Silvia
2017 “Lenguas, culturas y sensibilidades en los Estados Unidos: Español y Spanglish en un mundo inglés.” Hispania 100 (5): 35–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carolina Demography
2020North Carolina’s Hispanic Community: 2020 Snapshot. [URL] (Accessed 25 May, 2021).
Carvalho, Ilombe
2019Lenguaje inclusivo ¿de dónde proviene? La Izquierda Diario. [URL]
Corbett, Greville
2013 “Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmat. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
DeGuzmán, María
2017 “Latinx: ¡Estamos aquí!, or being “Latinx” at UNC-Chapel Hill.” Cultural Dynamics 29 (3): 214–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Onís, Catalina
2017 “What’s in an “x”?: An Exchange about the Politics of “Latinx.” Chiricú 1 (2): 78–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Rocío
2016Pequeño manifiesto sobre el género neutro en Castellano. [URL]
Guerra, Gilbert, and Gilbert Orbea
2015The argument against the use of the term “Latinx”. The Phoenix. [URL]
Guidelines for Inclusive Language
2016[URL]
Informe de la Real Academia Española sobre el lenguaje inclusivo y cuestiones conexas
2020[URL]
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2001Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langeaux, Milagros Andrea
2017 “El lenguaje inclusivo y la escritura académica en la universidad.” Actas de Periodismo y Comunicación 3: (1). Retrieved from | [URL]
Lindqvist, Anna, Aurora Renström, Emma, and Gustafsson Sendén, Marie
2019 “Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies.” Sex Roles 811: 109–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Andrew, and Kim Potowski
2014 “La valoración del habla bilingüe en los Estados Unidos: Fundamentos sociolingüísticos y pedagógicos en “Hablando bien se entiende la gente.” Hispania 91 (1): 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merriam-Webster
2019Merriam-Webster’s Words of the Year 2019. [URL]
Michnowicz, Jim, Alex Hyler, James Shepherd, and Sonya Trawick
2018 “Spanish in North Carolina: English-origin loanwords in a newly forming Hispanic community.” In Language Diversity in the New South, ed. by J. Reaser, E. Wilbanks, W. Wolfram and K. Wojcik, 289–305. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Moure, José Luis
2020Sobre el lenguaje inclusivo. Una nota del Presidente de la Academia Argentina de Letras. [URL]
Noe-Bustamonte, Luis, Lauren Mora and Mark Lopez
2020 “About one-in-four U.S. Hispanics have heard of Latinx, but just 3% use it. [URL]
Pew Hispanic Center
2014Demographic profile of Hispanics in North Carolina, 2014. [URL] (accessed May 25, 2021)
Quintero, Paula José
2019Yo, tú, elle, nosotres, vosotres, elles. El lenguaje inclusivo: ¿tiene algo que ofrecer? Psyciencia. [URL]
Reyes, Raul
2017To be Latinx or not to be Latinx? For some Hispanics that is the question. NBC News. [URL]
Ronquest, Rebecca, Jim Michnowicz, Eric Wilbanks, and Claudia Cortés
2020 “Examining the (mini-)variable swarm in the Spanish of the Southeast.” In Hispanic linguistics: Current issues and new directions, ed. by A. Morales-Front, M. Ferreira, R. Leow and C. Sanz, 303–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Mantilla, Jesús
2019El lenguaje inclusivo tensa a ‘todes’ en Argentina. El País. [URL]
Salinas Jr, Cristobal
2020 “The Complexity of the “x” in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o Students Relate to, Identify With, and Understand the TermLatinx.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salinas Jr, Cristobal, and Adele Lozano
2017 “Mapping and recontextualizing the evolution of the term Latinx: An environmental scanning in higher education.” Journal of Latinos and Education 18: (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharrón del Rió, María, and Alan Aja
2015The Case FOR ‘Latinx’: Why Intersectionality Is Not a Choice. [URL]
Steinmetz, Katy
2019This Is Why Singular ‘They’ Is Such a Controversial Subject. Time. [URL]
Trudgill, Peter
1988 “Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect.” En- glish World-Wide 9 (1): 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau
(2010) The Hispanic population: 2010. [URL] (1 September, 2020).
2019Quick facts: North Carolina. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from [URL]
Van Herk, Gerard, Paul DeDecker, and Jennifer Thorburn
2014 “Undergraduate-Conducted Surveys: Balancing Learning and Data Collection.” Methods in Dialectology XV 1, 11–15.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard
2008 “The very Big Class Project: Collaborative Language Research in Large Undergraduate Classes.” American Speech 83 (2): 222–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Ortiz, Salvador, and Juliana Martínez
2018 “Latinx thoughts: Latinidad with an X.” Latino Studies 16 (3): 384–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Mary Kohn, and Erin Callahan-Price
2011 “Southern-bred Hispanic English: An emerging socioethnic variety.” In Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. by J. Michnowicz and R. Dodsworth, 1–13. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia
2018 “LatinUs* and linguistics Complaints, conflicts, and contradictions – The anthro-political linguistics solution.” In Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry Papers in honor of Ricardo Otheguy, ed. by N. L. Shin and D. Erker, 189–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal
2017 “Transgender language reform: some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language.” Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1): 84–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar