Cover not available
Article published In:
Copulas in Spanish and Beyond
Edited by Silvia Gumiel-Molina and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Spanish in Context 20:2] 2023
► pp. 367–388

Cognitive underpinnings of the meaning of Spanish estar

Implications for its diachronic change

| Yale University
| The Ohio State University
The Spanish copula verb estar is currently taking part in two of the most well-known paths of semantic change across different dialectal varieties of Spanish: (a) as a main copula verb, in its encroachment on the domain of ser, and (b) as the auxiliary in the Present Progressive marker, as it encroaches in the domain of the Simple Present form (i.e., Sánchez-Alonso 2018; Fuchs 2020). Here we argue for the hypothesis that estar’s participation in both paths of change is not coincidental. Focusing on the copular use, we present arguments for the proposal that estar’s encroachment is connected to its lexico-conceptual structure, which, under specific communicative pressures, is afforded greater conversational informativity, thus systematically expanding its licensing contexts and, as a result, bolstering its use. Evidence consistent with this analysis emerges from use variation for estar across several dialects of Spanish, both in its copular and auxiliary uses.
Keywords: semantic change, copula, progressive, estar, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The lexical meaning of estar
  • 3.The conceptual underpinnings of estar
  • 4.The readings of estar sentences through the lens of estar’s conceptual structure
  • 5.The diachrony of copular estar and its conceptual basis
  • 6.One communicative mechanism of estar’s expansion: Perspective alignment
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00095.pin
References (31)
References
Aveledos, Fraibet, Sara Sánchez-Alonso, and María Mercedes Piñango. 2022. “Contextual dependency and overuse of estar in the acquisition of Spanish copula verbs.” First Language, 42(5), 649–669.Google Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat, and Francesc Roca. 2012. “Grammaticalization of ‘ser’ and ‘estar’ in Romance.” In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman and Andrew Garret, 73–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Catherine Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Weber and Ivan A. Sag, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10–63.Google Scholar
Clements, Joseph Clancy. 1988. “The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Spanish [Copula+Adjective] Construction.” Linguistics 26 (5): 779–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Ser-Estar in the Predicate Adjective Construction.” In Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity, ed. by Joseph Clancy Clements and Jiyoung Yoon, 161–202. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2014. “Formal Semantics/Pragmatics and Language Change.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Claire Bowern and Bethwyn Evans, 393–409. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Diachronic Semantics.” Annual Review of Linguistics 11: 179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell Vidal, Victoria. 2023. Evidential interpretations with estar + ILP. An experimental approach.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti. 2002. “Coercion and the Stage/Individual Distinction.” In From Words to Discourse: Trends in Spanish Semantics and Pragmatics, ed by. Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 159–179. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Martín. 2020. On the Synchrony and Diachrony of the Spanish Imperfective Domain: Contextual Modulation and Semantic Change. PhD Thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
. 2022. “The diachrony of the Present Progressive and the Simple Present in Spanish: two markers for the event-in-progress reading. In: A. Aitha, Steven Castro & Brianna Wilson (eds.), Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 111–122.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Martín, and María Mercedes Piñango. 2021. “Language variation and change through an experimental lens. Contextual modulation in the use of the Progressive in three Spanish dialects.” In Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics: Isolation and Contact, ed. by Whitney Chappell and Bridget Drinka, 78–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Martín, María Mercedes Piñango, and Ashwini Deo. 2020. “Operationalizing the role of context in language variation: the role of perspective alignment in the Spanish Imperfective domain.” In Concepts, Frames and Cascades in Semantics, Cognition and Ontology, ed. by Sebastian Löbner, Thomas Gamerschlag, Tobias Kalenscher, Markus Schrenk and Henk Zeevat, 201–217. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2023. A contrastive study of evidential readings of estar in Iberian Romance languages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Semantics Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Parts and Boundaries.” Cognition 411: 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. “A Discourse-Based Account of Spanish ‘ser’/‘estar’.” Linguistics 43 (1): 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangialavori, Eugenia, and Josep Ausensi. this issue. “Unexplored constructions with estar in Old Spanish: original (locative) meaning outweighing change.”Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñango, María Mercedes. 2019. “Concept Composition during Language Processing: a model and Two Case Studies”. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Chinese Linguistics, ed. by Chu-Ren Huang, Zhuo Jin-Schmidt and Barbara Meisterenst, 624–644. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roldán, Mercedes. 1974. “On the So-Called Auxiliaries ‘ser’ and ‘estar’.” Hispania 57 (2): 292–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Alonso, Sara. 2018. The Cognitive Sources of Language Change and Variation: Connecting Synchronic Variation and Diachrony in Spanish Copula Use. PhD Thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Alonso, Sara, Ashwini Deo, and María Mercedes Piñango. 2016. “Copula Distinction and Constrained Variability of Copula Use in Iberian and Mexican Spanish.” UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 23 (1).Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2012. “Grammaticalization through inherent variability: The development of a progressive in Spanish.” Studies in Language 361: 73–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaño-Cerdá, Antonio. 1982. Ser y estar + adjetivos: un estudio sincrónico y diacrónico. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Wit, Astrid de, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard. 2020. “Standing out with the progressive.” Journal of Linguistics 561: 479–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
2023. Perspectivized estar-sentences with aesthetic adjectives across American Spanish varieties. Spanish in Context 20:2 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.