Article published In:
Spanish in Context: Online-First Articles

Non-modal voice quality in Chilean Spanish

| Occidental College
Since the turn of the 21st century, research on phonation (the production of sound via the vibration of the vocal folds, also known as voice quality) has increased significantly. However, non-modal phonation is highly understudied in Spanish. Therefore, this study comprises a sociophonetic analysis of voice quality in Spanish, examining voice quality categorically from sociolinguistic interview speech conducted with 41 native monolingual Chilean Spanish speakers. The aim of the present paper is to interrogate how phonation varies among residents of Santiago, Chile. Specifically, it asks: what is the sociolinguistic distribution of non-modal voice quality in Chilean Spanish? How does this distribution align with work on voice quality in Spanish and in other languages? Results indicate that non-modal voice quality is used by speakers to mark prosodic boundaries such as phrase finality, aligning with robust cross- linguistic findings. Non-modal phonation is also incorporated when speakers are reporting speech, as well as when they are speaking about emotionally-charged subjects. I draw connections between these findings and those of other dialects of Spanish, and show that utterance-final devoicing, while often associated with “tierras altas” dialects of Spanish, may be more frequent in other dialects than previously indicated. I argue that further examinations of non-modal phonation should also examine third-wave approaches of attitude, emotion, and stance.
Keywords: sociophonetics, voice quality, phonation, Chilean Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of the pertinent literature
    • 2.1Linguistic correlates of non-modal phonation
    • 2.2Pragmatic/discursive correlates of non-modal phonation
    • 2.3Socio-demographic correlates of non-modal phonation
  • 3.Methods
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Socio-demographic findings
      • 5.1.1Results related to prosody
      • 5.1.2Results related to pragmatic/discursive meanings
    • 5.2Limitations and future directions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00109.bol
References (79)
References
Abdelli-Beruh, Nassima B., Lesley Wolk, and Dianne Slavin. 2014. “Prevalence of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Male American English Speakers.” Journal of Voice: Official Journal of the Voice Foundation 28 (2): 185–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acton, Eric K. 2021. “Pragmatics and the Third Wave: The Social Meaning of Definites.” In Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, ed. by Lauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva, 105–26. Cambridge University Press. [URL]. DOI logo
Airas, M., P. Alku, and M. Vainio. 2007. “Laryngeal Voice Quality Changes in Expression of Prominence in Continuous Speech.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Models and Analysis of Vocal Emissions for Biomedical Applications (MAVEBA 2007), 135–38. Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Meghan E., Nicholas Henriksen, and Christian DiCanio. 2015. “Sociophonetic Analysis of Young Peninsular Spanish Women’s Voice Quality.” In Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013, ed. by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras, and Elena Valenzuela, 293–312. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, Martin, John Esling, and Craig Dickson. 1995. “The VoQS System for the Transcription of Voice Quality.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 25 (2): 71–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed- Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, Barbara. 2002. “The Timing of Nonmodal Phonation in Vowels.” Journal of Phonetics, no. 30: 163–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolyanatz, Mariška, Abril Jiménez, and Isabella Silva DePue. 2024. “Acoustic Correlates of Subtypes of Irony in Chilean Spanish.” Languages 9(1): 22–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine, and Louis Goldstein. 1990. “Tiers in Articulatory Phonology, With Some Implications for Casual Speech.” In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, ed. by John Kingston and Mary Beckman, 341–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, John. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1993. “Prosodic and Functional Units of Language.” In Talking Data:Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane Edwards and Martin Lampert, 33–44. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Chong, Adam J., Megan Risdal, Ann Aly, Jesse Zymet, and Patricia Keating. 2020. “Effects of Consonantal Constrictions on Voice Quality.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (1): EL65–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, and Adam Jaworski. 1997. “Relevance, Accommodation and Conversation: Modeling the Social Dimension of Communication” 16 (2–3): 233–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowhurst, Megan J. 2018. “The Influence of Varying Vowel Phonation and Duration on Rhythmic Grouping Biases among Spanish and English Speakers.” Journal of Phonetics 661 (January): 82–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabkowski, Meghan Frances. 2020. “A Sociophonetic Investigation of Mexico City Spanish Vowel Reduction.” In Selected Papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Irene Vogel, 93–108. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16. John Benjamins Publishing Company. [URL]. DOI logo
Davidson, Lisa. 2021. “The Versatility of Creaky Phonation: Segmental, Prosodic, and Sociolinguistic Uses in the World’s Languages.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 12 (3): e1547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delforge, Ann Marie. 2008. “Unstressed Vowel Reduction in Andean Spanish.” In Selected Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 107–24. [URL]
Den, Yasuharu, and Hanae Koiso. 2015. “Factors Affecting Utterance-Final Vowel Devoicing in Spontaneous Japanese.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Paper 582.Google Scholar
Dilley, L., S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, and M. Ostendorf. 1996. “Glottalization of Word-Initial Vowels as a Function of Prosodic Structure.” Journal of Phonetics 24 (4): 423–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–82. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. [URL]. DOI logo
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolillo. 1993. “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane Edwards, and Martin Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41 (1): 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “The Limits of Meaning: Social Indexicality, Variation, and the Cline of Inferiority.” Language 95 (4): 751–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Melissa A. 2003a. “Voice Quality and Prosody in English.” Doctoral dissertation, UCLA. [URL]
2003b. “Voice Quality and Prosody in English.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by M. J. Solé, and Daniel Recasens i Vives, 2405–8. Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Esling, John. 1978. “The Identification of Features of Voice Quality in Social Groups.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8 (1–2): 18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The Laryngeal Articulator’s Influence on Voice Quality and Vowel Quality.” Fattori Sociali e Biologici Nella Variazione Fonetica, no. 3: 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, Christina. 2003. “Santa Ana Del Valle Zapotec Phonation.” MA Thesis, UCLA.
Esposito, Christina, and Sameer ud Dowla Khan. 2020. “The Cross-Linguistic Patterns of Phonation Types.” Language and Linguistics Compass 14 (12): e12392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fant, G., and A. Kruckenberg. 1989. “Preliminaries to the Study of Swedish Prose Reading and Reading Style.” Quarterly Progress and Status Report 30 (2): 1–80.Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc. 2019. “The Phonetics of Voice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics, ed. by William F. Katz and Peter F. Assmann, 1st ed., 75–106. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. | Series: Routledge handbooks in linguistics: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, Marc, and Patricia A. Keating. 2015. “Phrase-Final Creak: Articulation, Acoustics, and Distribution.” Presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland, OR, Portland, Oregon. [URL]
Gil Fernández, Juana. 2007. Fonética Para Profesores de Español: De La Teoría a La Práctica. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Gobl, Christer, and Ailbhe Ní Chasaide. 2003. “The Role of Voice Quality in Communicating Emotion, Mood and Attitude.” Speech Communication 401: 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, Carolina, Christine Weissglass, and Daniel Bates. 2022. “Creaky Voice and Prosodic Boundaries in Spanish: An Acoustic Study.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15 (1): 33–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, and Peter Ladefoged. 2001. “Phonation Types: A Cross-Linguistic Overview.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (4): 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieser, Jessica A. 2019. “Investigating Topic-Based Style Shifting in the Classic Sociolinguistic Interview.” American Speech 94 (1): 54–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva. 2021. “Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theoretical Foundations.” In Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, ed. by Lauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinze, Georg, Christine Wallisch, and Daniela Dunkler. 2018. “Variable Selection – A Review and Recommendations for the Practicing Statistician.” Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 60 (3): 431–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henton, Caroline, and Anthony Bladon. 1988. “Creak as a Sociophonetic Marker.” In Language, Speech, and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, ed. by Larry M. Hyman, and Charles Li, 3–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ishi, Carlos Toshinori, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2007. “Acoustic and EGG Analysis of Pressed Phonation.” In Proceedings of ICPhS, Saarbrucken.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Analysis of the Roles and the Dynamics of Breathy and Whispery Voice Qualities in Dialogue Speech.” EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing 2010 (1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2004. “Massive Reduction in Conversational American English.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis, ed. by Kiyoko Yoneyama and Kikuchi Maekawa, 29–54. Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter. 2007. “Creaky Voice in Slovene.” In III Congreso Internacional de Fonética Experimental, ed. by Manuel González González, Elisa Fernández Rei, and Begoña González Rei, 407–20. Santiago de Compostela, Spain. [URL]
Kim, Ji Young. 2017. “Voice Quality Transfer in the Production of Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish.” In Selected Papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar, and Adriana Soto-Corominas, 191–207. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11. London, Ontario, Canada: John Benjamins Publishing Company. [URL]. DOI logo
Klatt, Dennis H., and Laura C. Klatt. 1990. “Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Voice Quality Variations among Female and Male Talkers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (2): 820–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Laura, Susanne Fuchs, Annette Gerstenberg, and Moriah Rastegar. 2020. “Formant and Voice Quality Changes as a Function of Age in Women.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (4): 2471–2471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreiman, Jody, Bruce R. Gerratt, Marc Garellek, Robin Samlan, and Zhaoyan Zhang. 2014. “Toward a Unified Theory of Voice Production and Perception.” Loquens 1 (1): e009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krieman, Jody. 1982. “Perception of Sentence and Paragraph Boundaries in Natural Conversation.” Journal of Phonetics 101: 163–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuang, Jianjing, and Patricia Keating. 2014. “Vocal Fold Vibratory Patterns in Tense versus Lax Phonation Contrasts.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (5): 2784–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laver, John. 1980. The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1965. “Juncture.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 172–200. Münster: S. Karger. [URL]. DOI logo
Lieberman, Philip. 1967. Intonation, Perception, and Language. Vol. 381. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Sean. 2018. “A Sociophonetic Analysis of Word-Initial Vowel Glottalization in Monolingual and Bilingual Guatemalan Spanish.” Presented at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Texas, Austin.
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. “The Semiotic Hitchhiker’s Guide to Creaky Voice: Circulation and Gendered Hardcore in a Chicana/o Gang Persona: Creaky Voice, Circulation, and Gendered Hardcore in a Chicana/o Gang Persona.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21 (2): 261–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Iain R., and John L. Arnott. 1993. “Toward the Simulation of Emotion in Synthetic Speech: A Review of the Literature on Human Vocal Emotion.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (2): 1097–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe, and Christer Gobl. 2004. “Voice Quality and F0 in Prosody: Towards a Holistic Account.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, 189–96. Nara, Japan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2001. “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 (1): 139–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, Héctor, Marcela Fuentes, and Lluïsa Astruc. 2010. “Chilean Spanish Intonation.” In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, ed. by Pilar Prieto and Paolo Roseano, 255–1. LINCOM Studies in Phonetics. Munich: LINCOM Europa. [URL]
Podesva, Robert. 2007. “Phonation Type as a Stylistic Variable: The Use of Falsetto in Constructing a Persona.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (4): 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Gender and the Social Meaning of Non-Modal Phonation Type.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 371: 427–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., and Patrick Callier. 2015. “Voice Quality and Identity.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 351 (March): 173–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Redi, Laura, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2001. “Variation in the Realization of Glottalization in Normal Speakers.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (4): 407–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Brandon, and Christina Mirisis. 2018. “Voiceless Stop Lenition and Reduction as Social Phenomena in Concepción, Chile.” Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 7 (2): 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadowsky, Scott. 2021. “EMIS: Sistema de estratificación socioeconómica para la investigación lingüística.” In Chilean Spanish Linguistics: Studies on variation, innovation, contact, and identity, ed. by Brandon M. A. Rogers and Mauricio A. Figueroa Candia, 367–96. Vernon Press.Google Scholar
Shmueli, Galit. 2010. “To Explain or to Predict?” Statistical Science 25 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2010. “Shifting Voices with Participant Roles: Voice Qualities and Speech Registers in Mesoamerica.” Language in Society 39 (4): 521–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slifka, Janet. 2006. “Some Physiological Correlates to Regular and Irregular Phonation at the End of an Utterance.” Journal of Voice 20 (2): 171–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Caroline L. 2003. “Vowel Devoicing in Contemporary French.” Journal of French Language Studies 13 (2): 177–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd ed. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Sammi, Christopher Dromey, Shawn L. Nissen, Kristine Tanner, Dennis Eggett, and Kim Corbin-Lewis. 2020. “Age-Related Changes in Speech and Voice: Spectral and Cepstral Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 63 (3): 647–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torreira, Francisco, and Mirjam Ernestus. 2011. “Realization of Voiceless Stops and Vowels in Conversational French and Spanish.” Laboratory Phonology 2 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trittin, Pamela Jean, and Andrés de Santos y Lleó. 1995. “Voice Quality Analysis of Male and Female Spanish Speakers.” Speech Communication 16 (4): 359–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2009. “Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.” R. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilce, J. M. 1997. “Discourse, Power, and the Diagnosis of Weakness: Encountering Practitioners in Bangladesh.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 11 (3): 352–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, I. P. 2010. “Creaky Voice: A New Feminine Voice Quality for Young Urban-Oriented Upwardly Mobile American Women?” American Speech 85 (3): 315–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar