Ways of encoding attention to the interlocutor in contemporary spoken Spanish
The papers in this volume examine how Spanish speakers express attention to their interlocutors (or co-participants) verbally. It is now generally accepted that subjective expressions have interactional functions, encouraging the flow of discussion and creating cohesive discourse and that there are several ways of dealing with the intersubjective or dialogic nature of language: (i) studying heteroglossia or dialoguing voices in monologic texts, (ii) focusing on how in talk-in-interaction speakers refer to information held by the co-participant, (iii) examining intersubjective markers that encode the speaker’s assumptions about the co-participant. Concepts such as politeness, argumentation structure, attenuation and hedging are being used to account for the interactional dynamics examined. Moreover, several papers analyze the difference between spoken and written registers and some offer new evidence for functional paths of linguistic change. In doing so, they enrich previous accounts of modality, discourse markers, person referencing, spatial deixis and connectives in Spanish and beyond.
References (52)
Aikhenvald, Y. Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis, and Bert Cornillie (eds). 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics Research 31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail 1987. Problems of Dostoevski’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. “De la subjectivité dans le langage”. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, ed. by Emile Benveniste, 258–266. Paris: Editions Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergqvist, Henrik, and Lila San Roque. 2012. “Complex Perspective in Epistemic Marking: A Workshop on the Origins, Motivations and Definitions of Intersubjective Perspectives in Grammar”. Paper presented at the
45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE)
. Stockholm University. September 2012.
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde (eds). 2012. Intersections of intersubjectivity. Special issue of English text construction 5:1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Briz, Antonio. 1993. “Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): Su papel argumentativo”. Contextos 6 (21-22): 145–188.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bustos Tovar, José Jesús de, Patrick Charaudeau, José Luis Girón, Silvia Iglesias, and Covadonga López Alonso (eds.). 2000. Lengua, discurso, texto. I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso. Madrid: Visor.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, Jennifer. 1987. “Epistemic Modality and Spoken Discourse”. Transactions of the Philological Society 85 (1): 110–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi-)Auxiliaries. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 5). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornillie, Bert, and Paula Pietrandrea. 2012. “Modality at Work: Cognitive, Interactional and Textual Functions of Modal Markers”. Special issue of the Journal of Pragmatics
.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity”. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 365–392.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domínguez García, Noemí. 2007. Conectores argumentativos en textos breves. Madrid: Arco Libros.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle”. In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, Nick J., and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (1), 93–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara. 2007. La Argumentación Lingüística y Sus Medios de Expresión. Madrid: Arco/Libros. 88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara, and María Ester Brenes Peña. 2011. Aproximaciones a la (Des)Cortesía Verbal en Español. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction. Volume II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1979. “Footing”. Semiotica 25 (1-2): 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2005. “Cognition in Discourse”. In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2007. “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity”. In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail. 1987. “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation”. In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund. 2007. “Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar”. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 11, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. “Subjectification”. Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 5–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C., and Nick J. Enfield (eds). 2006. Roots of Human Sociality. Oxford, UK: Berg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marquez Reiter, Rosina. 2011. Mediated Business Interactions. Intercultural Communication between Speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia, and Estrella Montolío Durán (eds). 1988. Los marcadores del discurso: teoría y análisis. Madrid: Arco Libros.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montolío Durán, Estrella. 2001. Conectores de la lengua escrita. Barcelona: Ariel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 1998. Conexión y conectores. Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua, Cuadernos de Filología, Anexo XXVII. Valencia: Universitat de València.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portolés, José. 1995. “Diferencias gramaticales y pragmáticas entre los conectores discursivos pero, sin embargo y no obstante
”. Boletín de la Real Academia Española 751: 231–269.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emmanuel E. 1992. “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation”. American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1979. Meaning and Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. (eds). 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language 571: 33–65.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 2003. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification”. In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2020.
From Informational Status to Mitigation in Spanish Aunque Sea.
Corpus Pragmatics 4:1
► pp. 11 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.