Article published In:
Hearer-Orientation in Spoken Genres
Edited by Bert Cornillie and Barbara De Cock
[Spanish in Context 12:1] 2015
► pp. 19
References (52)
Aikhenvald, Y. Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis, and Bert Cornillie (eds). 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics Research 31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail 1987. Problems of Dostoevski’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. “De la subjectivité dans le langage”. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, ed. by Emile Benveniste, 258–266. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik, and Lila San Roque. 2012. “Complex Perspective in Epistemic Marking: A Workshop on the Origins, Motivations and Definitions of Intersubjective Perspectives in Grammar”. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE) . Stockholm University. September 2012.
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde (eds). 2012. Intersections of intersubjectivity. Special issue of English text construction 5:1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 1993. “Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): Su papel argumentativo”. Contextos 6 (21-22): 145–188.Google Scholar
Bustos Tovar, José Jesús de, Patrick Charaudeau, José Luis Girón, Silvia Iglesias, and Covadonga López Alonso (eds.). 2000. Lengua, discurso, texto. I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1987. “Epistemic Modality and Spoken Discourse”. Transactions of the Philological Society 85 (1): 110–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi-)Auxiliaries. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 5). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Paula Pietrandrea. 2012. “Modality at Work: Cognitive, Interactional and Textual Functions of Modal Markers”. Special issue of the Journal of Pragmatics .
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity”. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 365–392.Google Scholar
Domínguez García, Noemí. 2007. Conectores argumentativos en textos breves. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle”. In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert (ed.). 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (1), 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara. 2007. La Argumentación Lingüística y Sus Medios de Expresión. Madrid: Arco/Libros. 88.Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara, and María Ester Brenes Peña. 2011. Aproximaciones a la (Des)Cortesía Verbal en Español. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction. Volume II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. “Footing”. Semiotica 25 (1-2): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2005. “Cognition in Discourse”. In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity”. In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1987. “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation”. In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund. 2007. “Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar”. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 11, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. “Subjectification”. Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., and Nick J. Enfield (eds). 2006. Roots of Human Sociality. Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marquez Reiter, Rosina. 2011. Mediated Business Interactions. Intercultural Communication between Speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and Maria Elena Placencia (eds). 2004. Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia, and Estrella Montolío Durán (eds). 1988. Los marcadores del discurso: teoría y análisis. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Montolío Durán, Estrella. 2001. Conectores de la lengua escrita. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 1998. Conexión y conectores. Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua, Cuadernos de Filología, Anexo XXVII. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Portolés, José. 1995. “Diferencias gramaticales y pragmáticas entre los conectores discursivos pero, sin embargo y no obstante ”. Boletín de la Real Academia Española 751: 231–269.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel E. 1992. “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation”. American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Meaning and Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. (eds). 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language 571: 33–65.Google Scholar
. 2003. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification”. In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vazquez Carranza, Ariel. 2013. “Responding and Clarifying: An Analysis of pues as a Sequential Marker in Mexican Spanish Talk-in-Interactions”. Spanish in Context 10 (2): 284–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Intersubjectivity and the Architecture of the Language System”. In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, ed. by Jordan Zlatev, 307–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen (eds). 2008. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2020. From Informational Status to Mitigation in Spanish Aunque Sea. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.