Ways of encoding attention to the interlocutor in contemporary spoken Spanish
The papers in this volume examine how Spanish speakers express attention to their interlocutors (or co-participants) verbally. It is now generally accepted that subjective expressions have interactional functions, encouraging the flow of discussion and creating cohesive discourse and that there are several ways of dealing with the intersubjective or dialogic nature of language: (i) studying heteroglossia or dialoguing voices in monologic texts, (ii) focusing on how in talk-in-interaction speakers refer to information held by the co-participant, (iii) examining intersubjective markers that encode the speaker’s assumptions about the co-participant. Concepts such as politeness, argumentation structure, attenuation and hedging are being used to account for the interactional dynamics examined. Moreover, several papers analyze the difference between spoken and written registers and some offer new evidence for functional paths of linguistic change. In doing so, they enrich previous accounts of modality, discourse markers, person referencing, spatial deixis and connectives in Spanish and beyond.
References
Aikhenvald, Y. Alexandra
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis, and Bert Cornillie
(eds) 2006 Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity.
Cognitive Linguistics Research 31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1987 Problems of Dostoevski’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benveniste, Emile
1966 “
De la subjectivité dans le langage”. In
Problèmes de linguistique générale, ed. by
Emile Benveniste, 258–266. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergqvist, Henrik, and Lila San Roque
2012 “
Complex Perspective in Epistemic Marking: A Workshop on the Origins, Motivations and Definitions of Intersubjective Perspectives in Grammar”. Paper presented at the
45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE)
. Stockholm University. September 2012.
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde
Briz, Antonio
1993 “
Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): Su papel argumentativo”.
Contextos 6 (21-22): 145–188.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bustos Tovar, José Jesús de, Patrick Charaudeau, José Luis Girón, Silvia Iglesias, and Covadonga López Alonso
(eds.) 2000 Lengua, discurso, texto. I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso. Madrid: Visor.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, Jennifer
1987 “
Epistemic Modality and Spoken Discourse”.
Transactions of the Philological Society 85 (1): 110–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornillie, Bert
2007 Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi-)Auxiliaries. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. (
Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 5). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornillie, Bert, and Paula Pietrandrea
2012 “
Modality at Work: Cognitive, Interactional and Textual Functions of Modal Markers”. Special issue of the
Journal of Pragmatics
.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006 “
Coming to Terms with Subjectivity”.
Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 365–392.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domínguez García, Noemí
2007 Conectores argumentativos en textos breves. Madrid: Arco Libros.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W
2007 “
The Stance Triangle”. In
Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by
Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, Nick J., and Tanya Stivers
(eds) 2007 Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas
2007 “
View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective”.
Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (1), 93–120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara
2007 La Argumentación Lingüística y Sus Medios de Expresión. Madrid: Arco/Libros. 88.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara, and María Ester Brenes Peña
2011 Aproximaciones a la (Des)Cortesía Verbal en Español. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy
1990 Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction. Volume II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
1979 “
Footing”.
Semiotica 25 (1-2): 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John
2005 “
Cognition in Discourse”. In
Conversation and Cognition, ed. by
Hedwig te Molder, and
Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John
2007 “
Intersubjectivity and Progressivity”. In
Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by
Nick J. Enfield, and
Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John
2012 “
Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge”.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail
1987 “
On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation”. In
Talk and Social Organization, ed. by
Graham Button, and
John R.E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund
2007 “
Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar”. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 11, ed. by
Timothy Shopen, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald
1990 “
Subjectification”.
Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 5–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C., and Nick J. Enfield
(eds) 2006 Roots of Human Sociality. Oxford, UK: Berg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marquez Reiter, Rosina
2011 Mediated Business Interactions. Intercultural Communication between Speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and Maria Elena Placencia
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia, and Estrella Montolío Durán
(eds) 1988 Los marcadores del discurso: teoría y análisis. Madrid: Arco Libros.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montolío Durán, Estrella
2001 Conectores de la lengua escrita. Barcelona: Ariel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pons Bordería, Salvador
1998 Conexión y conectores. Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua, Cuadernos de Filología, Anexo XXVII. Valencia: Universitat de València.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portolés, José
1995 “
Diferencias gramaticales y pragmáticas entre los conectores discursivos pero, sin embargo y no obstante
”.
Boletín de la Real Academia Española 751: 231–269.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emmanuel E
1992 “
Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation”.
American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R
1979 Meaning and Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer
2007 The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
(eds) 2011 The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs
1989 “
On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”.
Language 571: 33–65.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs
2003 “
From Subjectification to Intersubjectification”. In
Motives for Language Change, ed. by
Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie
2005 Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2020.
From Informational Status to Mitigation in Spanish Aunque Sea.
Corpus Pragmatics 4:1
► pp. 11 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.